Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05833204
Other study ID # BARD
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2024
Est. completion date December 31, 2026

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source Universita di Verona
Contact Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD
Phone 0039 045 812 2720
Email stefano.uccella@univr.it
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, with more than 400,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the United States. As a consequence, even uncommon complications can affect large numbers of patients. Among potentially life-threatening events, vaginal cuff dehiscence complicates 0.14-1.38% of procedures, and any vaginal cuff complications (dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, infection) are estimated to affect 4.7-9.8% of patients. In this scenario, any preventive strategy can provide clinically relevant benefits. Regarding colporrhaphy, only the adoption of a laparoscopic approach instead of a vaginal approach is supported by high-quality evidence. Our group demonstrated that the laparoscopic closure of the vaginal cuff after total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces the incidence of vaginal cuff complications. Among other potentially effective interventions, the use of barbed sutures was associated with a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence than the standard suture. In a recent meta-analysis, the use of barbed sutures has been associated with a pooled incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence of 0.4% versus 2% after a traditional vaginal suture. However, this evidence is limited because most pooled studies were retrospective, and only two were randomized controlled trials. Moreover, these two randomized controlled trials had a very small sample size and were not powered to detect clinically relevant differences. On that basis, despite the promising utility of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the choice of the type of suture is not evidence-based but still guided by personal opinions, as well as by the preference and habits of the operators. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether the laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with barbed suture determines a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence and complications than conventional sutures after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 1614
Est. completion date December 31, 2026
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy - Surgery performed for the treatment of benign pathology - Age > 18 years - Surgery performed by laparoscopy - Signature of informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing emergent surgery - Patients candidates for hysterectomy for oncological indication - Patients who underwent previous radiation therapy - Patients allergic to the suture material used in the study - Patients unable to express adequate informed consent to participate in the study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture
After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture (V-Loc ™, Covidien, Medtronic)
Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with standard 0-caliber absorbable suture
After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber absorbable suture made of a coated braided thread (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc, Sommerville, NJ)

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Verona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universita di Verona

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (2)

Uccella S, Malzoni M, Cromi A, Seracchioli R, Ciravolo G, Fanfani F, Shakir F, Gueli Alletti S, Legge F, Berretta R, Corrado G, Casarella L, Donarini P, Zanello M, Perrone E, Gisone B, Vizza E, Scambia G, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):500.e1-500.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 2. — View Citation

Uccella S, Zorzato PC, Kho RM. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):710-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Vaginal cuff dehiscence Any partial or total separation of the vaginal cuff 30 days after surgery
Primary Vaginal cuff dehiscence Any partial or total separation of the vaginal cuff 90 days after surgery
Secondary Vaginal cuff complications Hematoma, abscess, infections, bleeding, resuture of the vaginal cuff 30 days after surgery
Secondary Vaginal cuff complications Hematoma, abscess, infections, bleeding, resuture of the vaginal cuff 90 days after surgery
Secondary Hospital stay Days of hospitalization from the day of admission to the day of discharge. From the date of hospital admission to the date of hospital discharge.
Secondary Operative time Time between first incision and skin closure During surgery
Secondary Intraoperative blood loss Total blood aspirate during the surgical procedure During surgery
Secondary 30-day post-surgical morbidity Perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification 30 days after surgery
Secondary Quality of life index The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) investigates 8 different health aspects. Physical activity, role and physical health, role and emotional state, and mental health are measured by two questions. The SF-12 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. 90 days after surgery
Secondary Sexual function The female sexual function index (FSFI) consists of 19 multiple-choice items that assess female sexual functioning based on 6 domains: desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, sexual satisfaction, and lubrication. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with 26.55 as the cut-off suggesting the presence of sexual dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function. 90 days after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01584128 - Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose to Decrease Vaginal Cuff Complications N/A