Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Patients

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary purpose is to evaluate the quality of post-operative recovery and post-operative pain in elderly patients (more than 75 years) who undergo laparoscopic surgery for uterine prolapse.

Clinical Trial Description

Previous randomized clinical trial (NCT01887028) showed that the combined use of a low intraperitoneal pressure and a warmed, humidified CO2 gas resulted in better clinical outcomes (better quality of post-operative recovery and less post-operative pain) in patients aged 45-75 years, who underwent laparoscopic surgery for uterine prolapse.

Quality of post-operative recovery is very important in elderly patients. Investigators hypothesize that the combined use of a low intraperitoneal pressure and a warmed, humidified CO2 gas may also result in better clinical outcomes.

In this observational clinical trial, quality of post-operative recovery by QoR-40, post-operative pain by Visual Analog Scale, intra or postoperative complications and intraoperative core temperature are evaluated in elderly patients (more than 75 years old) who undergo laparoscopic surgery for uterine prolapse. Investigators use a low intraperitoneal pressure (6 mmHg) and a warmed, humidified CO2 gas during laparoscopy.

These outcomes will be compared with those of previous randomized clinical trial. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03095716
Study type	Observational
Source	University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Contact	Patrick LACARIN
Phone	04 73 75 11 95
Email	placarin@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	October 2016
Completion date	December 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT00158626` - Does Doing Pelvic Floor Exercise Ease Symptoms for Women Living With Prolapse?	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT04009694` - Does a High BMI Affect Supervised Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Improving Symptoms in Women With Various Stages of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?	N/A
Completed	`NCT02888093` - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04209036` - Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01097200` - Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00162604` - Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment During Vaginal Repair	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02547155` - Does Spinal Anesthesia for Prolapse Surgery With Lead to Urinary Retention?	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01396109` - GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03056586` - The Effect of Pessary Post Vaginal Prolapse Repair, for One Month, to Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Prolapse	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06024109` - Performance of SYMMCORA® vs. V-Loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
Completed	`NCT02680145` - Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use	N/A
Completed	`NCT00557882` - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT05586984` - Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
Recruiting	`NCT02935803` - A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT01628432` - Effect of Salpingectomy During Conservative Hysterectomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04637022` - 4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Terminated	`NCT01594372` - Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02231099` - Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT00475540` - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse	N/A
Completed	`NCT00535301` - Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair	Phase 4