Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01396109
Other study ID # pumch-gyn-01
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received July 13, 2011
Last updated December 25, 2012
Start date March 2011
Est. completion date March 2016

Study information

Verified date March 2011
Source Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Contact Lan Zhu
Phone 86-10-65296238
Email zhu_julie@vip.sina.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Ministry of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Pelvic Organ prolapse (a feeling of bulge in the vagina) may cause some distressing symptoms such as loss of control of the bowel or bladder, and may also cause problems with patient's sex life. The primary treatment is surgery, sometimes a mesh is placed in the pelvis to support the weakened tissues, but mesh implants can cause complications.

This study is designed to determine the effectiveness and safety of GYNECARE PROSIMA* pelvic floor repair system compared with the modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh for the treatment of uterine prolapse.

Patients enrolled into the study will be followed up for up to 3 years after surgery. Evaluation will take place during surgery and postoperative visit. Stage of prolapse before and after surgery, patient satisfaction through quality of life and sexual function questionnaires before and after surgery, and peri-operative complication rates will be evaluated.


Description:

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. The high rate of failure has led to an increasing use of synthetic grafts to augment vaginal repair procedures to obtain more durable results. In 2005, the investigators began to perform modified pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with mesh. The nation-wide multicenter prospective clinical trial data showed that it was safe, efficient and cost-effective. No severe intraoperative complications were recorded and the recurrence rate after 1 year follow-up was 8.1%. Quality of life improved significantly from the baseline, while the sexual function did not change.

The GYNECARE PROSIMA* system is a new technique. It provides a simplified unanchored mesh repair, avoiding the need for dissection outside the pelvic cavity and avoids passage of suture and instruments through the obturator foramen and sacrospinous ligament, thus making surgery much simpler to perform and reduces the risk of the specific complications that can occur with suture placement or tunneling. 1-year anatomic and functional outcomes of international multicenter prospective study for POP-Q Stage I I-III pelvic organ prolapse showed the objective success rate was 76.9%, pelvic symptoms, quality of life, and sexual function improved significantly from baseline.

In clinical practice, many women have symptomatic POP-Q Stage III uterine prolapse, which requires surgical correction. They are relatively young, and therefore care more about the long-term outcomes and quality of life after procedure. The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, and comparative study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these two procedures concomitantly performed with vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) in the treatment of symptomatic POP-Q Stage III uterine prolapse in China.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date March 2016
Est. primary completion date March 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 60 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Candidates with symptomatic uterine prolapse of ICS POP-Q Stage III(with any degree of vaginal prolapse), suitable for surgical repair.

- Vaginal hysterectomy will be performed concurrently.

- Without stress urinary incontinence or occult stress urinary incontinence with no need of mid-urethral sling procedures for incontinence to be performed.

- Age = 60 years.

- Agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and documents this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee / IRB approved informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Additional surgical intervention concurrent to the procedure (e.g. sacrocolpopexy, paravaginal repair, tubal sterilisation).

- Previous repair of pelvic organ prolapse involving insertion of mesh.

- Experimental drug or experimental medical device within 3 months prior to the planned procedure.

- Active genital, urinary or systemic infection at the time of the surgical procedure. Surgery may be delayed in such subjects until the infection is cleared.

- Coagulation disorder or on therapeutic anticoagulant therapy at the time of surgery.

- History of chemotherapy or pelvic radiation therapy.

- Systemic disease known to affect bladder or bowel function (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or trauma).

- Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (e.g. interstitial cystitis, endometriosis, coccydynia, vulvodynia).

- Nursing or pregnant or intends future pregnancy.

- Chronic cough not well-controlled.

- BMI=30.

- In the investigator's opinion, any medical condition or psychiatric illness that could potentially be life threatening or affect their ability to complete the study visits according to this protocol.

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Procedure: TVH and GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System
Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment with GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System concurrently with transvaginal hysterectomy.
Procedure: TVH and Modified Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with mesh
Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment of Modified Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with mesh concurrently with transvaginal hysterectomy.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing
China Peking University Third Hospital Beijing
China Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang
China Hefei Maternity and Child Health Hospital Hefei Anhui
China Laizhou Municipal People's Hospital Laizhou Shandong
China Gansu Maternity and Child Health Hospital Lanzhou Gansu
China Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jiangxi Province Nanchang Jiangxi
China Hebei Provincial Hospital Shijiazhuang Hebei
China Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu
China the First Affliliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score. 4 weeks No
Primary Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score. 6 months No
Primary Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score. 12 months No
Primary Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score. 2 years No
Primary Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score. 3 years No
Secondary Hospital data including operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, maximum temperature, time of voiding recovery. At discharge, an expected average of 5 days after operation. Yes
Secondary Pain score measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). 24 hours post surgery and at the 3-4 week visit Yes
Secondary Presence/absence of complications (composite score). The occurrence (in the per-operative phase or within 6 weeks post-op) of at least one of the following: 1) bleeding complications; 2) infectious complications; 3) any wound caused by a surgeon movement: bladder, ureteral, or vascular injuries; 4)medical complications: deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and etc.Complications will be categorized using the Dindo surgical complication grading scale. Up to 6 weeks. Yes
Secondary Change from baseline in PFIQ-7 scores. 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 3 years. No
Secondary In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function using PISQ-12 (mean scores and change from baseline) 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 3 years. No
Secondary Subject global impression assessed on a 5 point Likert scale 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 3 years. No
Secondary Presence/absence of complications (composite score) Long-term negative outcomes of the surgical procedure will also be recorded until 3 years after surgery. For example, mesh erosion, de novo urinary incontinence, de novo dyspareunia and overall failure rate. Complications will be categorized using the Dindo surgical complication grading scale. Up to 3 years. Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00158626 - Does Doing Pelvic Floor Exercise Ease Symptoms for Women Living With Prolapse? Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04009694 - Does a High BMI Affect Supervised Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Improving Symptoms in Women With Various Stages of Pelvic Organ Prolapse? N/A
Recruiting NCT03095716 - Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Patients N/A
Completed NCT02888093 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension N/A
Recruiting NCT04209036 - Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
Active, not recruiting NCT01097200 - Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse N/A
Recruiting NCT00162604 - Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment During Vaginal Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT02547155 - Does Spinal Anesthesia for Prolapse Surgery With Lead to Urinary Retention? N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03056586 - The Effect of Pessary Post Vaginal Prolapse Repair, for One Month, to Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Prolapse N/A
Recruiting NCT06024109 - Performance of SYMMCORA® vs. V-Loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
Completed NCT02680145 - Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use N/A
Completed NCT00557882 - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05586984 - Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
Recruiting NCT02935803 - A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients N/A
Completed NCT01628432 - Effect of Salpingectomy During Conservative Hysterectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04637022 - 4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Terminated NCT01594372 - Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02231099 - Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00475540 - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse N/A
Completed NCT00535301 - Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair Phase 4