Comparison of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy With Traditional Laparoscopic Myomectomy

Uterine Myoma Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01542658
• Other study ID #: 100167-E
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: February 26, 2012
• Last updated: March 1, 2012
• Start date: February 2012
• Est. completion date: February 2012

Study information

• Verified date: February 2012
• Source: Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Taiwan: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is to reveal any potential advantage of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy (RLAM) over Traditional Laparoscopic Myomectomy (TLM) by comparing the perioperative variables and short-term outcome of RALM and TLM patients.

Description:

All patients with symptomatic uterine myomas who underwent traditional laparoscopic myomectomy or robotic laparoscopic myomectomy were enrolled.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 42
• Est. completion date: February 2012
• Est. primary completion date: February 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 20 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• cases with uterine myoma

Study Design

Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Retrospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Leiomyoma
• Uterine Myoma

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital	Banqiao	New Taipei

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	amount of postoperation abdominal drainage		5 days	No
Secondary	operation time		1 day	No
Secondary	blood loss		1 day	No