Uterine Cervical Incompetence Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Collection of Data About the Use of the Dilapan-S Osmotic Dilator in Pre-induction of Labor in Women With/Without Caesarean Section in Their History
Verified date | March 2014 |
Source | Medicem International CR s.r.o. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Czech Republic: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Observational |
Non-interventional prospective data collection designed to evaluate clinical outcome on the efficacy of the use of Dilapan-S in the indication of labor pre-induction in women with/without a history of Caesarean section. The evaluation will be based on prospective data collection in at least four obstetrics centers in the Czech Republic.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 125 |
Est. completion date | October 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Single pregnancy - Pregnancy more than 36 weeks - Vertex presentation of the fetus - Cervix Score less than 4 points Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindication to vaginal delivery - Pathological fetal station - States after uterine body surgery - except for Caesarean section - Clinical signs of uterine, vaginal or vulvar infection - Fetus hypoxia (KTG recording evaluated as pathological prior to pre-induction initiation) |
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Czech Republic | Clinic of Gynecology&Obstetrics, University hospital in Brno and Masaryk University Medical School | Brno |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medicem International CR s.r.o. |
Czech Republic,
Allen RH, Goldberg AB; Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):139-56. Epub 2007 Jul 10. — View Citation
Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182983889. — View Citation
Borgatta L, Lopatinsky I, Shaw FM. Overcoming unsatisfactory colposcopy. Use of osmotic dilators. J Reprod Med. 1997 May;42(5):271-5. — View Citation
Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6. — View Citation
Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20. — View Citation
Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. Epub 2007 Nov 5. — View Citation
Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11. — View Citation
Lyus R, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 13. — View Citation
Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080. — View Citation
Roztocil A, Pilka L, Jelínek J, Koudelka M, Miklica J. A comparison of three preinduction cervical priming methods: prostaglandin E2 gel, Dilapan S rods and Estradiol gel. Ceska Gynekol. 1998 Feb;63(1):3-9. — View Citation
Samuel MI, Parsons JH. Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7. doi: 10.1783/147118909787072234. — View Citation
Serhal P, Ranieri DM, Khadum I, Wakim RA. Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarian stimulation facilitates embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2618-20. — View Citation
Wilson LC, Meyn LA, Creinin MD. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Dec 3. — View Citation
* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Course of removal of Dilapan-S rods after pre-induction | The evaluation of the course of removal of Dilapan-S after termination of preinduction by physician as very easy, easy, standard, with some complications or very complicated. | At the moment of removal of Dilapan-S rods after labor pre-induction phase up to 1 day after delivery | Yes |
Other | Occurance of complication of rupture of fetal sac due to the use of Dilapan-S or other complications related to the use of Dilapan-S | From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 h of duration of labor pre-induction phase | Yes | |
Other | Patients´evaluation of pre-induction of labor with Dilapan-S | Subjective satisfaction Pain experienced during Dilapan-S insertion and pre-induction phase Quality of relax and sleep Frequency and intensity of uterine contractions during pre-induction | From Dilapan-S insertion up to 24 h of duration of labor pre-induction phase | Yes |
Primary | Cervix (Bishop) score | To evaluate, based on the value obtained in the Cervix Score, the efficacy of use of the Dilapan-S device in the indication labor pre-induction, and to compare outcomes in patients with/without a history of Caesarean section. | Before pre-induction of labor performance and up to 24 h after pre-induction of labor | No |
Secondary | Total duration of pre-induction | To compare these outcomes in patients with and without a history of Caesarean section. | From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 hours | No |
Secondary | Number of dilators inserted | Expected the insertion from 2 to 5 Dilapan-S rods. To compare these results in patients with/without Cesarean section in their medical history. | At the moment of Dilapan-S insertion up to 24 hours until their removal | No |
Secondary | Uterine contractions | To compare these results in patients with/without Caesearean section in their medical history. Uterine hypertonus is diagnosed, when the number of uterine contractions is higher than 5 within 10 minutes (during pre-induction). | From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 h during pre-induction of labor phase | Yes |
Secondary | The course of delivery (vaginally or Caesarean section) | To compare the rate of vaginal delivery/Caesarean sections in patients with/without Caesarean section in their medical history. | From active phase of labor up to 1 day after delivery | Yes |
Secondary | Apgar score | To compare these results in patients with/without Caesarean section in their medical history. | At 1st, 5th and 10th minute after delivery | Yes |
Secondary | pH of the fetus | To compare the results in patients with/without caesarean section in their medical history. The rate of ceses with pH below 7,1. | Up to 10 minutes after delivery | Yes |
Secondary | Infection complications of mother / fetus | Clinical signs of infection are defined as follows: CRP levels > 8 mg/l Leukocyte count > 18 x 109/l Body temperature > 37.5°C |
Up to 5 days from the birth | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05132829 -
Azithromycin to Improve Latency in Exam Indicated Cerclage Control Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01737788 -
Cervical Occlusion for the Prevention of Preterm Birth
|
N/A |