Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Women undergoing a LEEP procedure who receive lidocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate for their cervical block will experience less injection pain than women who receive plain lidocaine.


Clinical Trial Description

Specific aims:

1. To determine whether buffering the agent used for intracervical anesthetic at the time of cervical loop excision reduces injection-related pain. (Hypothesis: buffering significantly reduces injection-related pain.)

2. To determine whether other components of pain from LEEP (procedural pain, and cramping) can be reduced by buffering of intracervical anesthetic among women undergoing cervical loop excision. (Hypothesis: only injection pain will be reduced by buffering, as procedural pain will be reduced by lidocaine equally in both arms and cramping will not be reduced in either arm.)

Background:

Although cervical cancer rates have been dramatically reduced by Pap test screening and the eradication of precursors, more than 100,000 U.S. women develop premalignant cervical lesions each year that require treatment (1). The cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is the most common therapy for CIN among U.S. gynecologists. LEEP is performed using one or more 1-2 cm electrosurgical diathermy loops to excise involved and at-risk cervical epithelium including underlying stroma containing glands. Destroying this tissue eliminates cells infected with human papillomavirus, the proximate cause of cervical cancer, and radically reduces the risk of later developing cervical cancer (2, 3).

LEEP is usually performed as an outpatient procedure using intracervical anesthesia, most commonly combining lidocaine as an anesthetic agent with epinephrine as a hemostatic agent; final hemostasis is achieved using electrosurgical fulguration and topical hemostatic agents (4). Prior literature has suggested that pain from LEEP has 3 components: pain from injection of the anesthetic combination, pain from the excision, and cramping from reflex uterine contractions (5). While cramping can be controlled with oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, injection and procedural pain are not. Most women categorize the pain of LEEP as 3-7 on a 0-10 Likert scale (5, 6).

Studies of dermal and ocular anesthesia and bone marrow biopsy have found that buffering of acidic local anesthetic agents reduces injection pain (7-14), with up to 66% reduction in pain and significant results in randomized trials involving 30-50 participants. However, the use of buffered lidocaine has not yet been tested for LEEPs. The principal investigator has used both forms of anesthesia and considers both acceptable forms of therapy; he is unaware of any evidence to support the superiority of either arm. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01405768
Study type Interventional
Source Washington University School of Medicine
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
Start date July 2011
Completion date December 2012

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01505920 - Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection During LEEP: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT01014026 - Self-sampling and Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Testing for Unscreened Women in Cervical Cancer Prevention Phase 3
Completed NCT00377845 - Cervix Cytological Screening - Comparison of Tampon Self-Test and the Routine Smear. Phase 0
Completed NCT02910388 - LLETZ Under Direct Colposcopic Vision N/A
Completed NCT00596258 - A Two-Stage Phase 2 Study Of A-007 Topical Gel in High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) Phase 2
Completed NCT03763565 - Effectiveness of HPV Vaccine in Thai Adult Women
Completed NCT04415840 - Lugol's Solution in Addition to Acetic Acid During Colposcopy
Recruiting NCT04783805 - Conservative Management of HSIL in Patients With Future Pregnancy Aspiration
Completed NCT04326049 - LLETZ With Videocolposcopy Versus LLETZ With Binocular Colposcopy N/A
Completed NCT02486471 - Hemostatic Procedure After Biopsy of the Cervix N/A
Completed NCT02515162 - Fischer Cone Biopsy Excisor Versus Loop Excision Procedure for Conization N/A
Completed NCT00264732 - A Study of Amolimogene (ZYC101a) in Patients With High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions of the Uterine Cervix Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03296566 - The SAFE Study: Satisfaction and Adherence to Follow-Up With Colposcopy Exams N/A
Completed NCT02346227 - Impact of AV2 Antiviral Drug on the Treatment of HPV-associated Lesions of the Uterine Cervix Phase 3
Completed NCT02330471 - Forced Versus Spray Coagulation in Women Undergoing LLETZ-conization for Cervical Dysplasia: a Randomized Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT01035580 - Trial on Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Intravaginal Curcumin Phase 1
Completed NCT01639820 - Comparison of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Isolated Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure for Early Stages of Cervical Cancers : a Multicenter Study With Evaluation of Medico-economic Impacts N/A
Completed NCT00285207 - Safety and Efficacy of A-007 Topical Gel in the Treatment of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) of the Cervix Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05225493 - HIV Indicator Diseases in Hospital and Primary Care
Completed NCT01034358 - Immune Response to the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Young Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Phase 4