View clinical trials related to Uterine Cervical Dysplasia.
Filter by:To assess the effect of live video-colposcopy on women´s anxiety.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether smartphone photos may assist health-care worker (on-site) and to evaluate the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of cervical examination with smartphone photos of VIA (D-VIA), on-site and off-site, compared with conventional VIA, for human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women.
This trial will study the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with aminolaevulinic acid for the treatment of patients with HPV+ low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (LSIL;CIN1).
In a randomized clinical trial of 160 women undergoing conization for cervical dysplasia, two electrosurgical excision methods, Fischer Cone Biopsy Excison vs. Loop Excision Procedure, will be compared. The primary outcome of the study is dysplasia-free resection margin rate, secondary outcomes are intraoperative blood loss, time to complete hemostasis, intervention time, postoperative pain, intra- and postoperative complications, the resected cone volume and users satisfaction.
Cervical stenosis may occur in up to 19% after conization. It is a cause of infertility and amenorrhea. This study will test a new device named DUDA Device ("Dispositivo Uterino para dilatar canal endocervical") placed just after the conization, in order to evaluate the safety, efficacy and quality of life.
Cytological abnormalities of the Cervix uteri need to be clarified by colposcopy biopsy. To avoid bleeding after biopsy, monsel´s paste is a common used Agent. In a randomized clinical Trial the use of monsel´s paste after biopsy will be compared to no Intervention. The Primary outcome of the study is blood loss, secondary outcomes are pain, satisfaction of the patient and influence of Independent factors such as Age and Body mass index.
This is a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a human papilloma virus (HPV) therapeutic vaccine called PepCan (HPV 16 E6 peptides combined with Candida skin testing reagent called Candin®) in adult females over a 12 month time period. As the results from the Phase I trial demonstrated some efficacy against non-16 HPV types, Candin alone will also be tested. Therefore, there will be two treatment arms: (1) PepCan and (2) Candin. Subjects found to be eligible for vaccination will be randomized in a double-blinded fashion at a 1:1 ratio. Each participant will be receiving injections four times with three weeks between injections. Clinical and virological responses will be assessed at 6 and 12 months. Safety will be assessed from the time of enrollment to 12 Month Visit. Immunological assessments will be made at 4 time points (prevaccination, after 2 injections, 6 month after 4 injections and 12 months after 4 vaccinations).
In a prospective case-control study, 140 medical students (,novices') and 10 Senior gynecologists (,experts') will perform a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) on a Training model afte having undergone a Video Training session. Their LLETZ-Performance will be assessed using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) protocol designed for judging the surgical proficiency when performing a LLETZ. Using metrical and non-metrical data points, construct validity of the LLETZ training model to distinguish between experts and novices will be assessed. Secondary endpoints are differences in OSATS scores within the group of novices based on gender and handyness, as well as satisfaction of the novices with the learning experience.
The goal of this clinical research study is to compare a type of imaging called high-resolution microendoscopy (HRME) for detecting abnormal tissue in the cervix to the standard of care, which is visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with a colposcopy procedure. Researchers also want to learn if HRME images can show the difference between cancerous tissue and normal cervical tissue.
Several reasons can explain non-attendance in cervical cancer screening. In low resource settings the attendance is even lower. The effect of fee as contributing reason of non attendance has not been studied before why the investigators decided to study this in a low resource setting as a randomised trial.