Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02955563
Other study ID # PRO16050247
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2017
Est. completion date May 16, 2019

Study information

Verified date June 2019
Source University of Pittsburgh
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal is to develop a pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome problems with surrogate decision making in ICUs.

The aim is to conduct a pilot study among surrogates and clinicians of 50 incapacitated patients at high risk of death to assess the feasibility of deploying the web-based tool as well as to examine the tools impact on the patient and family outcome measures summarized in the hypotheses below.


Description:

Roughly 600,000 Americans annually die in or shortly after an ICU admission, generally after decisions by surrogates to forego life support. Several decades of research indicate:

1. Family members in ICUs often struggle in the role of surrogate and experience high rates of lasting psychological sequelae (e.g. depression, anxiety, PTSD). For example, a systematic review found that one third of surrogates have long term feelings of guilt and doubt about the decisions they made.

2. Patients often receive treatment that is inconsistent with their values and preferences. For example, in the SUPPORT trial, physicians were frequently unaware of patients' wishes regarding end-of-life care, and patients often died receiving more invasive treatment than they preferred.

3. Intensive care near the end of life is a significant contributor to health care costs. For example, medical care in the last year of life accounts for 25% of Medicare costs, and ICU care contributes substantially.

Breakdowns in clinician-family communication in ICUs are common and an important target for interventions. Using quantitative analysis of audiorecorded goals of care discussions in ICUs, we found that in more than 50% of conversations clinicians did not inquire about the patient's values and treatment preferences, and in a similar proportion failed to explicitly offer alternatives to indefinite life-prolonging treatment, such as time-limited trials or comfort-focused treatment. We have also documented frequent omissions of important prognostic information during such conversations and other researchers have documented that surrogates often hold unduly optimistic estimates of patients' prognosis. These data highlight the importance of improving the quality of collaborative decision making in ICUs.

This proposal is responsive to national research priorities: The proposed research addresses priority areas for national action from the Institute of Medicine and NIH: improving clinician-family communication and end-of-life care for patients with advanced organ system failure. It is responsive to calls by the Institute on Aging to promote patient-centered decision making for elderly patients.

A critical barrier to addressing these problems is the absence of a scalable intervention. No empirically validated decision support tools exist for the range of critical illnesses confronted in ICUs. Prior interventions to address these problems (e.g., proactive palliative care consultation or adding a family support counselor to the ICU team) face major barriers to dissemination due to projected palliative care workforce shortages and the high cost of adding more personnel to ICU care teams.

A pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome these problems has been developed. This pilot study among surrogates and clinicians of 50 incapacitated patients will assess the feasibility of deploying the web-based tool as well as to examine the tools impact on measures of communication and decision quality.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date May 16, 2019
Est. primary completion date May 16, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Surrogate decision maker for ICU patient that lacks decisional capacity

- Permission from Patient's ICU Primary Attending Physician

Exclusion Criteria:

- Non-English Speaking

- Inability to read or write

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
CSDM Web-Based Tool Intervention
The web and tablet-based tool is designed to help family members become familiar with ICU environment, routines, and clinicians, prepare for family meetings, and learn how to make values-based decisions for their loved one. The tool contains short videos, interactive exercises, and links to other resources. Family members work through the tool shortly after admission to the ICU, before each family meeting, and any other time they wish to during the ICU admission.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Pittsburgh

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (20)

A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA. 1995 Nov 22-29;274(20):1591-8. Erratum in: JAMA 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1232. — View Citation

Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-Of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):638-43. — View Citation

Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, Canoui P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3044-9. — View Citation

Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bollaert PE, Darmon M, Fassier T, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goulenok C, Goldgran-Toledano D, Hayon J, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Laplace C, Larché J, Liotier J, Papazian L, Poisson C, Reignier J, Saidi F, Schlemmer B; FAMIREA Study Group. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94. Epub 2005 Jan 21. — View Citation

Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 4;346(14):1061-6. — View Citation

Hogan C, Lunney J, Gabel J, Lynn J. Medicare beneficiaries' costs of care in the last year of life. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jul-Aug;20(4):188-95. — View Citation

Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across united states intensive care units using a trigger-based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb 15;189(4):428-36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1229OC. — View Citation

Lupu D; American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Workforce Task Force. Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):899-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.004. — View Citation

Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, Wu AW, Desbiens N, Harrold J, Claessens MT, Wenger N, Kreling B, Connors AF Jr. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jan 15;126(2):97-106. — View Citation

O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR63-72. Review. — View Citation

O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. Review. — View Citation

Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Oct;158(4):1163-7. — View Citation

Riley GF, Lubitz JD. Long-term trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):565-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01082.x. Epub 2010 Feb 9. — View Citation

Schenker Y, Tiver GA, Hong SY, White DB. Association between physicians' beliefs and the option of comfort care for critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1607-15. Epub 2012 Aug 11. — View Citation

Schenker Y, Tiver GA, Hong SY, White DB. Discussion of treatment trials in intensive care. J Crit Care. 2013 Oct;28(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Jun 13. — View Citation

Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD001431. — View Citation

Sudore RL, Fried TR. Redefining the "planning" in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):256-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008. — View Citation

Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):336-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008. Review. — View Citation

White DB, Braddock CH 3rd, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):461-7. — View Citation

White DB, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Lo B, Curtis JR. Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):442-8. — View Citation

* Note: There are 20 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale To assess surrogate emotional state during intervention Three months post-discharge
Other Impact of Events Scale To assess risk of post-traumatic stress disorder Three months post-discharge
Other Inventory of Complicated Grief To assess complicated grief Three months post-discharge
Other Quality of Communication Scale To assess communication between surrogates and clinicians Three months post-discharge
Other Mortality Death Three months post-discharge
Other Functional status To assess basic activities of daily living Three months post-discharge
Other Patient-Perceived Centeredness of Care Scale To assess patient centeredness of care adapted for use by surrogates Three months post-discharge
Other Hospital costs To assess costs of hospital Three months post-discharge
Other 3-month health care utilization To assess health care utilization over specified period Three months post-discharge
Primary Intervention compliance Data tracking analytics will be employed to determine the extent to which the tool is used as per protocol. Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary Participants' ratings of usability of the tool Usability of the tool will be measured with the System Usability Scale Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary Participants' ratings of acceptability of the tool Acceptability will be measured with the user Acceptability Assessment Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary Participants' ratings of perceived usefulness of the tool Usefulness will be measured with the Usefulness Assessment Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary Feasibility of enrolling family members in a critical care setting Measured by meeting target enrollment Through study completion, estimate one year past primary start date
Secondary Feasibility of retaining family members in a critical care setting in a trial The number of subjects that complete the long term follow up Three months post-discharge
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04103827 - Qoos Use Sustaining Health Among patIents hOspitalized in Geriatric mediciNe (QUSHION)
Recruiting NCT05608967 - Effect of a Prehabilitation Mobile Application Versus Standard of Care Before Colon Cancer Surgery.
Recruiting NCT06046053 - MATRIX-002: Trial to Assess Acceptability and Safety of Two Placebo Vaginal Films Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05235334 - Evaluating Mental Health Improvements After Using Home Phototherapy Device With UVB LEDs N/A
Completed NCT04070261 - Usability Comparison of a mHealth Application for Pre-anesthesia Evaluation Before and After Re-design of User Interface
Not yet recruiting NCT04102384 - Usability and Satisfaction With an Electronic Survey Administration Application in General Population N/A
Completed NCT04304976 - Clinical Trial ROBERT® - Project Active Training N/A
Completed NCT04807608 - EmbracePlus, Care App and Aura Usability Study
Not yet recruiting NCT06207084 - The Fit With Us Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06446934 - AKTIIA OBPM to Assess CPAP Effect on Blood Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea N/A
Recruiting NCT05937646 - Improving Providers' Decision-Making and Reducing Information Overload Using Information Visualization in EHRs N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04497025 - Conventional Vestibular Training Versus Immersive Virtual Reality- Based Vestibular in Multiple Sclerosis N/A
Recruiting NCT05499572 - Usability of Levodopa Cyclops™ vs INBRIJA® in Parkinson's Patients
Completed NCT05318287 - Walk With Me for Perinatal Grief N/A
Completed NCT04182165 - Non-Contact Monitoring of Subjects With an Optical Device: A Pilot Usability Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05340127 - Summative Usability Study of CEREBO® - a Non Invasive Intracranial Hemorrhage Detector N/A