View clinical trials related to Urticaria.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral UCB8600.
Each patient will commence the study with a one month run-in period in which he/she will be administered individual patient Standard of Care :anti-histamines and steroids as needed plus placebo (olive oil). After the run-in period, doses of CBD will be incresed during the first six weeks of the study. At the conclusion of the six weeks CBD dose escalation segment of the study, if the 300 mg CBD dose level is deemed safe for two weeks with standard of care doses of anti-histamines, patients will continue receiving 300 mg CBD with Anti-histamines as needed for an additional follow-up period of three month. Each patient will serve as his/her own control.
A Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P39 and Xolair in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine Treatment
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of a single dose of UB-221 in healthy volunteers.
The goal of this study is to describe the prevalence and the type of parasite in patients with a chronic spontaneous urticaria as well as to describe the associations between parasitic disease and the characteristics of the patients, for example eosinophilia.
The primary goal of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of RPH-104 in subjects with Schnitzler Syndrome using Schnitzler Disease Activity Score (SDAS), which includes the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the local laboratory C-reactive protein (CRP) result
The purpose of this extension study was to establish efficacy and safety of ligelizumab. This was assessed in adult and adolescent chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients who had completed a preceding ligelizumab study and have relapsed, following treatment in these preceding studies, despite standard of care H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) treatment. This study also fulfilled the Novartis commitment to provide post-trial access to patients who had completed studies: CQGE031C2302 (NCT03580369), CQGE031C2303 (NCT03580356), CQGE031C2202 (NCT03437278) or CQGE031C1301 (NCT03907878).
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subcutaneous injection with ShotBlocker® on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Background: In chronic diseases such as CSU, after subcutaneous injection, problems such as pain, ecchymosis and hematoma may arise due to the injection technique. This may lead to tissue loss at the injection site subsequent injections of subcutaneously administered omalizumab every twenty-eight days and increase the stress level. Design: Randomized placebo controlled. Methods: Data were collected between June-November 2018 by including 90 patients out of 125 patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Dermatology Clinic, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Patients were divided into three groups as intervention, control and shotblocker group. Patients in the placebo group were administered with the reverse side of ShotBlocker® during subcutaneous injection, and no intervention was performed in the control group. The group using ShotBlocker® for subcutaneous injection was compared with the placebo and control groups.
Primary Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab in study participants with CSU who remain symptomatic despite the use of H1 antihistamine (Study A and C: omalizumab naïve; Study B: omalizumab intolerant or incomplete responders) Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria activity composite endpoint and itch or hives, separately, at various timepoints To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on angioedema To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria control To demonstrate improvement in health-related quality of life and overall disease status and severity To evaluate the ability of dupilumab in reducing the proportion of patients who require treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) To evaluate safety outcome measures To evaluate immunogenicity of dupilumab
The study is to evaluate the profiles of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of UB-221. In this study, safety profile of UB-221 and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is to be investigated using sentinel dosing strategy. The starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg is selected based on the evaluation and comparison of various approaches including NOAEL, MABEL (minimum anticipated biological effect level), and experiences from other anti-IgE mAb drugs in development.