View clinical trials related to Urothelial Carcinoma.
Filter by:This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of trilaciclib administered with platinum-based chemotherapy followed by trilaciclib administered with avelumab maintenance therapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy in patients receiving first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic bladder cancer.
This study is being done to see if a drug called disitamab vedotin, alone or with pembrolizumab, works to treat HER2 expressing urothelial cancer. It will also test how safe the drug is for participants. Participants will have cancer that has spread in the body near where it started (locally advanced) and cannot be removed (unresectable) or has spread through the body (metastatic). It will also study what side effects happen when participants get the drug. A side effect is anything a drug does to your body besides treating the disease.
This is a phase 1b feasibility study of pre-operative immunotherapy in PD-L1 positive resectable stage II-III urothelial cancer patients. This study can be adapted or expanded based on the results obtained.
A multicenter ambispective (retrospective and prospective) non-interventional study of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (adv/mUC) treated with avelumab in France, not impacting the treatment decision made by the treating physician and the medical management of treated patients.
This is an open-label, parallel group, non-randomized, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of spartalizumab (cohorts 1 and 2) and tislelizumab (cohort 3) in monotherapy in patients with PD1-high-expressing tumors.
An open-label, dose-escalation, phase I clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of JS004 injection in the patients with advanced solid tumors who have failure in standard of care and are unable to tolerate standard of care and/or have no available standard of care. The study is divided into screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period. 1. Screening period: Subjects will be included in the screening period after signing the informed consent form (ICF). The screening period is up to 28 days, subjects will enter the study treatment period if they meet all the inclusion criteria and none of exclusion criterion. 2. Treatment period: Subjects will be allocated to the designated dose group to receive corresponding treatment in accordance with the progress of study. Subjects in dose escalation phase will receive DLT observation at first, and upon completion of DLT observation, the subjects will continue their administration at the original dose if they are tolerated as judged by investigator, until progression of disease, intolerable toxicity or other reasons specified in the protocol. Subjects in the dose extension phase receive appropriate study treatment until disease progression, intolerance of toxicity, or other causes specified in the protocol occur. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1) will be used for efficacy evaluation every 9 weeks (±7 days) in the first year and every 12 weeks (±7 days) in the 2nd year and thereafter. 3. Follow-up period: A safety follow-up visit is required 30 days (±7 days) after the last dose of study drug or before the initiation of new antitumor therapy. If the new antitumor therapy has not been initiated, additional safety follow-up should be completed 90 days (±7 days) after the last dose as far as possible.
Our multicenter observational study is a non-profit prospective study. The study was born from the Amplitude Project, which comprise the SOD of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urological Surgery and Renal Transplants of AOU Careggi with the University of Florence, as well as with the National Research Council (CNR) and the University of Milan Bicocca (UNIMIB) The study consists of a phase of enrollment of patients who will be admitted to the SOD of Mini Invasive Robotic Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation of AOU Careggi. Enrollment in the study does not alter normal clinical practice and does not involve additional risks for patients. Patients will have to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study and will be enrolled sequentially, until the established sample size is reached. Patients undergoing surgery for the removal of bladder neoplasm, be it endoscopic or surgical with radical intent (cystectomy), will be taken a fragment of tumor bladder tissue, on which histopathological analysis will be performed. In patients undergoing radical cystectomy only, a fragment of healthy urothelial tissue, free from neoplasia, will also be removed. The samples will be performed in patients under general and / or spinal anesthesia in case of TURB, thus not causing pain or discomfort to the patient, or ex-vivo on the operative piece in case of radical cystectomy, without causing further damage or pain to the patient. From these samples, specially stored in solutions that keep their characteristics unaltered, a 3D culture model (organoid) will be obtained both from cells obtained from bladder cancer and from healthy tissue on which biomolecular, metabolomic and spectroscopic characterization studies will be tested and carried out. with a view to staging and grading bladder neoplasia.
This is a phase II study to determine the safety and efficacy of tislelizumab when given in combination with nab-paclitaxel as perioperative treatment in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) prior to cystectomy or complete TURBT. Patients will receive treatment with tislelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 3 treatment cycles over 9 weeks followed by standard radical cystectomy or complete TURBT.
To facilitate the follow-up of urothelial tumors and also make them more tolerable and less invasive for patients, there is a minimally invasive and easy to perform examination which is urinary cytology on 3 samples. This test is extremely specific, over 90% chance of cancer if it is positive and is performed by expert cytopathologists, but it is burdened by a very low sensitivity, which is especially acute in the case of low grade tumors. This makes it an extremely useful test in case of positivity, but of little use if negative or doubtful, not being able to consider it reliable. To overcome this problem, our study aims to bring an approach based on a physical principle, that is spectroscopy, which is fast non-invasive and does not require the use of additional substances or contrast media in the diagnosis of urothelial neoplasms in samples of urine. In our experience, multimodal optical fiber spectroscopy has proved extremely valid in discriminating healthy urothelial tissue from tumor ex vivo, as well as providing important information on the degree of urothelial neoplasia, with accuracy rates higher than 80%, for which developed the idea of a technique based on multimodal spectroscopy. If our method proves valid, it could improve the follow up and management of patients with urothelial cancer, being able to support normal cytology and provide further support to the cytopathologist, as well as simplify the diagnosis.
This global, randomized, controlled, open-label Phase 3 study was designed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of UGN-102 (mitomycin) for intravesical solution with or without (±) transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) versus TURBT alone for the treatment of patients with low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (LG-IR-NMIBC).