Urologic Neoplasms Clinical Trial
— LUX-Bladder 1Official title:
LUX-Bladder 1: Phase II Open Label Single Arm Exploratory Trial of Oral Afatinib Monotherapy Following Platinum Failure for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Tract Carcinoma With Genetic Alterations in ERBB Receptors.
Verified date | October 2020 |
Source | Boehringer Ingelheim |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this trial is to assess the anti-tumour activity and safety of afatinib monotherapy in patients with urothelial tract carcinoma carrying ERBB2 or ERBB3 (Erythroblastic leukaemia viral oncogene homolog of the human epidermal growth factor family of receptors) mutations or ERBB2 amplifications (Cohort A), and EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) amplification positive tumours (Cohort B), progressing despite previous platinum based chemotherapy, and thereby to improve their prognosis. The antitumour activity of afatinib monotherapy in these patients will be assessed by progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6). This will be the primary endpoint of the trial. A key secondary endpoint will also be defined, the objective response rate (ORR).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 42 |
Est. completion date | September 2, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | September 24, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: - Recurrent or metastatic urothelial cancer - Patients must have failed prior platinum based treatment (adjuvant or 1st line) - Archival tissue sample available for biomarker testing at pre-screening and tissue banking. - Patients should complete a pre-screening biomarker analysis and should fulfill the following: for Cohort A tumour should show a ERBB2 (epidermal growth factor family receptor 2) or ERBB3 mutation, or ERBB2 gene amplification; for Cohort B tumour should show EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) amplification. - Further inclusion criteria apply Exclusion criteria: - Prior use of EGFR, ERBB2 or ERBB3 targeted treatment - Chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to the start of study treatment. Biological therapy or investigational agents within 4 weeks prior to the start of study treatment or prior to passing 5 half-lives, i.e. systemic clearance, whatever comes first - Known brain metastases or signs hereof, uncontrolled spinal cord compression or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis - Further exclusion criteria apply |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | INS Bergonié | Bordeaux | |
France | CTR Leon Berard | Lyon | |
France | INS Cancérologie du Gard | Nîmes | |
France | HOP Cochin | Paris | |
France | HOP Européen G. Pompidou | Paris | |
France | HOP Saint-Louis | Paris | |
France | HOP Foch | Suresnes | |
France | INS Universitaire du Cancer | Toulouse | |
France | INS Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | |
Italy | Ospedale San Donato di Arezzo | Arezzo | |
Italy | A.O. San Camillo Forlanini | Roma | |
Spain | Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol | Badalona | |
Spain | Hospital Clínic de Barcelona | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de Elche | Elche | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta | Girona | |
Spain | Hospital Duran i Reynals | L'Hospitalet de Llobregat | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti | Lugo | |
Spain | CIO Clara Campal | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Clínico San Carlos | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital La Paz | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Ramón y Cajal | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Son Espases | Palma de Mallorca | |
Spain | CS Parc Taulí | Sabadell | |
Spain | Hospital Virgen del Rocío | Sevilla | |
Spain | Hospital Virgen Macarena | Sevilla | |
Spain | Instituto Valenciano de Oncología | Valencia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Boehringer Ingelheim |
France, Italy, Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival at Six Months (PFS6) in Cohort A | Progression-free survival at 6 months for Cohort A was defined as the number of patients who were alive and without disease progression at 24-week tumour assessment. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, together with an absolute increase in the sum of LD of at least 5 millimeter OR The appearance of one or more new lesions. | From start of treatment till assesment at week 24. | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Confirmed Objective Response (ORR) in Cohort A | Confirmed objective response by investigator review for Cohort A was defined as the number of participants with confirmed complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or confirmed partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, reference is baseline sum LD). Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. | Scans every 8 (±1) weeks from start till end of treatment. Afterwards, if discontinuation was not for progression: every 8 (±1) weeks until month 6, every 12 (±2) weeks thereafter. Until documented disease progression, i.e., up to ~ 20 Months. | |
Secondary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Cohort A | Progression-free survival was defined as the time (months) from the date of the first afatinib administration to the date of disease progression or death (if the patient died without progression). The date of progression for the primary analyses was determined based on investigator assessment. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to RECIST version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, together with an absolute increase in the sum of LD of at least 5 millimeter OR The appearance of one or more new lesions. | Scans every 8 (±1) weeks from start till end of treatment. Afterwards, if discontinuation was not for progression: every 8 (±1) weeks until month 6, every 12 (±2) weeks thereafter. Until documented disease progression, i.e., up to ~ 20 Months. | |
Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) in Cohort A | Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from start of treatment of afatinib until death from any cause. | From start of treatment of afatinib until death from any cause, i.e. up to approximately 20 Months. | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Disease Control (DCR) in Cohort A | Disease control was calculated as the number of participants with complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions), partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, reference is baseline sum LD), or stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters (SoD), nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD (Progression) taking as reference the smallest SoD since the treatment started). Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. | Scans every 8 (±1) weeks from start till end of treatment. Afterwards, if discontinuation was not for progression: every 8 (±1) weeks until month 6, every 12 (±2) weeks thereafter. Until documented disease progression, i.e., up to ~ 20 Months. | |
Secondary | Duration of Disease Control in Cohort A | For patients with disease control, duration of disease control was defined as the time from afatinib treatment start to disease progression (or death if the patient died before progression).
Disease control was defined as a having a complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions), partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, reference is baseline sum LD), or stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters (SoD), nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest SoD since the treatment started). Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (CT or MRI) evaluation by the investigators according to RECIST version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. |
Scans every 8 (±1) weeks from start till end of treatment. Afterwards, if discontinuation was not for progression: every 8 (±1) weeks until month 6, every 12 (±2) weeks thereafter. Until documented disease progression, i.e., up to ~ 20 Months. | |
Secondary | Number of Patients With Tumour Shrinkage in Cohort A | Number of patients with tumour shrinkage, tumour shrinkage from baseline was defined by the maximum percentage decrease from baseline in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Baseline imaging was to be performed within 28 days before afatinib treatment start, if the patient already had a tumour assessment within this timeframe, this test was not repeated. | Scans every 8 (±1) weeks from start till end of treatment. Afterwards, if discontinuation was not for progression: every 8 (±1) weeks until month 6, every 12 (±2) weeks thereafter. Until documented disease progression, i.e., up to ~ 20 Months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00151034 -
Trastuzumab (Herceptin), Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Urothelial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04933604 -
LPN in Patients With High-complex Renal Tumors
|
||
Completed |
NCT03219333 -
A Study of Enfortumab Vedotin for Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04052113 -
Real World Evidence of PD-L1, TMB Prevalence and Efficacy of 1st Line Chemotherapy in These High or Low Population for Stage IV Urothelial Cancer
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02543645 -
A Study of Varlilumab and Atezolizumab in Patients With Advanced Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01454089 -
A Phase 2 Study Comparing Chemotherapy in Combination With OGX-427 or Placebo in Patients With Bladder Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03288545 -
A Study of Enfortumab Vedotin Alone or With Other Therapies for Treatment of Urothelial Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05025930 -
Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Endoscopic Surgical Instrument Control System (SP1000).
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05135520 -
Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Extraction of Laparoscopically-excised Kidney Specimen
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04630483 -
Platelet-lymphocyte and Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02386111 -
A Study of Varlilumab (Anti-CD27) and Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03081858 -
Proliposomal Intravesical Paclitaxel for Treatment of Low-Grade, Stage Ta, Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04644432 -
Individualized Treatment Strategy for Patients With Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308771 -
To Investigate the Use of a New Syringe "Visual Pressure Control (VPC)" for Epidural Anesthesia in Children Surgery
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00226954 -
Zoledronic Acid With Intermittent Hormonal Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05113134 -
Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Extraction of Laparoscopically-excised Specimen
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04213157 -
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Tumors
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04922047 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Tislelizumab in Combination With BCG in HR-NMIBC Patients (TACBIN-01)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06353906 -
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Pembrolizumab for Locoregionally Advanced Penile Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05935748 -
Ph2 Study NKT2152 With Palbociclib & Sasanlimab in Subjects With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRcc)
|
Phase 2 |