HD5 Levels in Catheter Versus Bag Urine Specimens in Young Children for the Diagnosis of UTI

Urinary Tract Infections Clinical Trial

Official title:

HD5 Levels in Catheter Versus Bag Urine Specimens in Young Children for the Diagnosis of UTI

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03163394
• Other study ID #: HD52017
• Status: Terminated
• Start date: April 23, 2017
• Est. completion date: June 10, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: February 2020
• Source: Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of bacteremia and serious bacterial infections in young children (2-24 months of age). Because these children are usually unable to say what symptoms they are experiencing, UTIs are diagnosed through testing. Current testing of urine samples require a catheter or suprapubic aspiration performed for urine collection for infections markers to be reliable. Bag specimens often have varying results that can be poor in sensitivity and specificity depending on what component of the urine test one is looking at. Catheter and aspiration testing can be anxiety-provoking to parents, be painful for patients and even introduce bacteria into the bladder. An antimicrobial peptide called alpha human defensin-5 (HD5) is produced by the uroepithelium in response to infection. HD5 has been studied in the urine and does increase in actual UTIs. This study will look at children 1 to 24 months of age and again study levels of HD5 in culture positive UTIs versus urine negative for UTI. This study will also determine if collection method alters HD5 levels. We will measure HD5 levels in the urine from a bag specimen and a catheter specimen in the same patient.

Our primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HD5 measured in urine collected by bag and catheter in the same patient for the diagnosis of UTI in children between the age 1 to 24 months presenting with febrile illness and suspected UTI.

Description:

Pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common diagnosis and account for greater than 500,000 emergency department (ED) visits each year in the US. Although prevalence varies by age, gender, ethnicity and circumcision status, the overall prevalence is cited between 5% to 13.8%. UTIs also account for a large number of pediatric hospital admissions with up to 50,000 children admitted per year, 40% of which occurring in children under the age of 1 year. In children under the age of two, diagnosis of UTI is difficult as patients are unable to verbalize complaints and often present with only fever or other nonspecific symptoms such as vomiting. UTIs are the leading cause of occult bacteremia and serious bacterial infection in the 2-24 month age range.

A definitive diagnosis of UTI is made when a patient has pyuria and/or bacteriuria with a positive urine culture. For non-toilet trained children who have urine collected by either suprapubic aspiration (SPA) or bladder catheterization, a urine culture is considered positive if a single uropathogenic organism of at least 50,000 colony forming units (CFU) per mL is recovered. Identification of a uropathogen by culture can take up to 48 hours to be completed which delays treatment and risks progression of infection if antibiotics are not given empirically. Commonly, clinicians use urine microscopy and dipstick for quick diagnosis to enable early empiric treatment of UTIs. However, the components of the urinalysis are limited in sensitivity and specificity even for specimens of high quality such as those obtained by catheterization or suprapubic tap. The main components of urine dipstick testing are leukocyte esterase (LE) and nitrite levels in urine. The LE test has a sensitivity of 94% when combined with clinical suspicion for UTI, but a specificity of only 83%. False positives for UTI occur when LE is positive in the child who has pyuria for other reasons besides infection, for example, in urethritis or Kawasaki disease. False negatives can occur in young children because the pattern of more frequent urination allows less time to mount an adequate inflammatory response to bacteria. Nitrites have a low sensitivity in young children (53%) due to frequent voiding not allowing sufficient time (up to 4 hours) for production of nitrites by bladder-dwelling bacteria; however, specificity is high (98%) making this a good test to rule in UTI. Sensitivity and specificity of urine microscopy for WBCs and bacteria are worse than for LE with pyuria (5 or more WBC/high power field on a spun sample or >10 WBC/hpf on an un-spun sample) having a sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 81% respectively. Presence of bacteria on microscopy has a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 83% respectively. The resulting over- and under-treatment for false positive and negative urinalyses leads to increased costs, antibiotic resistance and unnecessary adverse events from antibiotics. The inaccuracy of the traditional urinalysis on bagged urine samples is much greater than for catheter specimens. These specimens suffer from false positives results for leukocyte esterase and cultures at rates up to 75-88% because of contamination by urogenital flora and white blood cells present on the perineum.

As a result of the poor performance characteristics of routine urinalyses on bag specimens, a sample obtained by catheterization in children who are not yet toilet-trained is required even for UTI screening. This is invasive and painful for the child, causes anxiety for the family, leads to urethral trauma and can even introduce bacteria into the urinary system. Recent research describes a new two-step technique of obtaining urine samples of screening for UTI on these young patients. First, a bagged urine sample is taken, and if suspicious for UTI by urinalysis, the patient then is catheterized for culture. One study showed that this technique decreased the number of catheterizations by 33%; however, given the low specificity of the urinalyses on bag specimens, there is still substantial room for reductions in unnecessary bladder catheterizations.

New urinary biomarkers hold promise to improve screening accuracy for UTIs. Watson et al. investigated antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as urinary biomarkers of UTIs in children. One specific AMP, derived from the epithelium, is human alpha-defensin 5 (HD5). This AMP is produced by intestinal Paneth cells, the female genital tract and the uroepithelium. HD5 was found to have mean concentration significantly higher in the urine from culture-positive compared to culture-negative specimens. When used in combination with LE, HD5 increased the specificity of the LE-only test by 6% without decreasing the sensitivity (97% for LE > trace). This study determined the optimal cut-off value of 174 pg/mg creatinine to declare sample positive. Because HD5 is not derived from white blood cells, its presence is not affected by the presence or absence of WBCs in the urine to accurately identify urinary inflammation. While the authors of this study examined results from both clean-catch and catheterized specimens, they did not analyze samples collected by both techniques from the same patient.

Identification and validation of biomarkers with improved performance characteristics could reduce over-treatment of UTIs; validating such biomarkers on bag urine specimens has the further benefit of reducing the need for catheterization to provide urine to screen for UTI in a relatively unselected population of young children who have fever without a focus. We propose to compare the use of HD5 in bag versus catheter urine samples on children 1 to 24 months of age to determine if the biomarker has similarly high sensitivity and specificity to the original study in both specimen types. Eliminating the need for urine culture would also save on costs for children whose rapid testing does not suggest UTI. Reducing the number of catheterizations performed on young children will decrease the number of painful procedures, prevent introduction of bacteria in the urinary tract and decrease parental anxiety.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 5
• Est. completion date: June 10, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: June 10, 2019
• Gender: All
• Age group: 1 Month to 24 Months

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient is between 1 to 24 months of age Patient has reported or measured fever >38.5 degrees C (101.3 degrees F)

Exclusion Criteria:

RSV Positive at time of urine collection Flu Positive at time of urine collection Known GU abnormality Neurogenic bladder Frequent catheterizations Indwelling catheter Antibiotics in the last 7 days

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Urinary Tract Infections

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	LeBonheur Children's Hospital	Memphis	Tennessee

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (19)

Bonadio WA. Urine culturing technique in febrile infants. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1987 Jun;3(2):75-8. — View Citation

Caterino JM, Hains DS, Camargo CA, Quraishi SA, Saxena V, Schwaderer AL. A Prospective, Observational Pilot Study of the Use of Urinary Antimicrobial Peptides in Diagnosing Emergency Department Patients With Positive Urine Cultures. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(10):1226-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12770. Epub 2015 Sep 16. — View Citation

Downs SM. Technical report: urinary tract infections in febrile infants and young children. The Urinary Tract Subcommittee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Quality Improvement. Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e54. — View Citation

Glissmeyer EW, Korgenski EK, Wilkes J, Schunk JE, Sheng X, Blaschke AJ, Byington CL. Dipstick screening for urinary tract infection in febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1121-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3291. — View Citation

Gorelick MH, Shaw KN. Screening tests for urinary tract infection in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 1999 Nov;104(5):e54. — View Citation

Hay AD, Sterne JA, Hood K, Little P, Delaney B, Hollingworth W, Wootton M, Howe R, MacGowan A, Lawton M, Busby J, Pickles T, Birnie K, O'Brien K, Waldron CA, Dudley J, Van Der Voort J, Downing H, Thomas-Jones E, Harman K, Lisles C, Rumsby K, Durbaba S, Whiting P, Butler CC. Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Children in Primary Care: Results from the DUTY Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study. Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jul;14(4):325-36. doi: 10.1370/afm.1954. — View Citation

Kazi BA, Buffone GJ, Revell PA, Chandramohan L, Dowlin MD, Cruz AT. Performance characteristics of urinalyses for the diagnosis of pediatric urinary tract infection. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1405-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Jul 26. — View Citation

Lavelle JM, Blackstone MM, Funari MK, Roper C, Lopez P, Schast A, Taylor AM, Voorhis CB, Henien M, Shaw KN. Two-Step Process for ED UTI Screening in Febrile Young Children: Reducing Catheterization Rates. Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). pii: e20153023. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3023. Epub 2016 Jun 2. — View Citation

Lee HE, Kim DK, Kang HK, Park K. The diagnosis of febrile urinary tract infection in children may be facilitated by urinary biomarkers. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015 Jan;30(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2905-5. Epub 2014 Aug 16. — View Citation

Sahsi RS, Carpenter CR. Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Does this child have a urinary tract infection? Ann Emerg Med. 2009 May;53(5):680-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.031. Epub 2008 Jul 21. — View Citation

Schmidt B, Copp HL. Work-up of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infection. Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;42(4):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Aug 4. Review. — View Citation

Schroeder AR, Chang PW, Shen MW, Biondi EA, Greenhow TL. Diagnostic accuracy of the urinalysis for urinary tract infection in infants <3 months of age. Pediatrics. 2015 Jun;135(6):965-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0012. — View Citation

Spencer JD, Hains DS, Porter E, Bevins CL, DiRosario J, Becknell B, Wang H, Schwaderer AL. Human alpha defensin 5 expression in the human kidney and urinary tract. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031712. Epub 2012 Feb 16. — View Citation

Spencer JD, Schwaderer A, McHugh K, Hains DS. Pediatric urinary tract infections: an analysis of hospitalizations, charges, and costs in the USA. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Dec;25(12):2469-75. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1625-8. Epub 2010 Aug 14. — View Citation

Spencer JD, Schwaderer AL, Becknell B, Watson J, Hains DS. The innate immune response during urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Jul;29(7):1139-49. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2513-9. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Review. — View Citation

Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management, Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):595-610. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1330. Epub 2011 Aug 28. — View Citation

Watson JR, Hains DS, Cohen DM, Spencer JD, Kline JM, Yin H, Schwaderer AL. Evaluation of novel urinary tract infection biomarkers in children. Pediatr Res. 2016 Jun;79(6):934-9. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.33. Epub 2016 Feb 17. — View Citation

Whiting P, Westwood M, Watt I, Cooper J, Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2005 Apr 5;5(1):4. Review. — View Citation

Williams GJ, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Turner RM, Hodson E, Craig JC. Absolute and relative accuracy of rapid urine tests for urinary tract infection in children: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;10(4):240-50. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70031-1. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Sensitivity and specificity of HD5 as marker for UTI	The sensitivity and specificity of HD5 in determining urinary tract infections in bag versus catheter specimens in children aged 1 to 24 months	1 year