View clinical trials related to Urinary Bladder, Overactive.
Filter by:AMBER AURA-2 study (Augmenting Urinary Reflex Activity 2) is a short-duration (6 month) safety and electrophysiological study using an implanted Amber UI system and two electrode leads to provide closed-loop pudendal nerve stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence.
The purpose of this prospective, multicenter study is to assess the safety and efficacy of tibial neuromodulation using the Medtronic Tibial Neuromodulation (TNM) system.
This study will evaluate the treatment satisfaction, discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, and safety with Vibegron for the treatment of OAB in the context of real-world clinical practice.
This is a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of TTNS versus a sham intervention. Both interventions will be performed by participants in their homes after standardized instruction. The primary outcome is a comparison of the mean change in OAB-q scores before and after treatment between the intervention and control groups. Changes in the number of urgency incontinence episodes and an estimation of cost effectiveness will additionally be measured. Intention to treat analysis will be performed.
This study is for patients who have idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms. This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of Neuronox® against placebo.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate a new medical device treatment for Overactive Bladder (OAB) in women.
The aim of the original study was to compare Incobot/A versus Onabot/A in order to evaluate if the differences in the pharmacologic formulations between the two drugs could affect their efficacy and safety in the treatment of neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB). In the original study protocol two different dosages for either Incobot/A and Onabot/A (200 U and 100 U) were considered, to treat patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence performing intermittent catheterization (IC) with higher dosages and those able to void spontaneously with lower dosage, with the resulting four treatment groups. For such a study, a very large sample of participants should have been treated and followed up, to have adequate power to demonstrate the hypothesis. At the end of last February 2020, we had to temporarily stop all the clinical activities related to the study and patients' recruitment, due to the occurrence of Sars-Cov-2 pandemic in our Country. At that point, a non-inferiority study seemed to be possible and adequate, and we adapted the protocol accordingly. In addition, on the basis of previously published information, we could hypothesize that the new drug (Incobot/A) would have had at least a roughly similar effect to the control drug (Onabot/A). In order to perform a non-inferiority study, the power and sample size analysis have been re-planned. Thus, we perform a not planned interim analysis to show the preliminary results of an ongoing, non-inferiority trial in which patients' recruitment temporarily stopped due to incontrollable external factors. The present study will be aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Incobot/A compared to Onabot/A on the efficacy and safety parameters, in the treatment of patients with refractory NDOI performing IC, who are randomized to receive 200 U of Incobot/A or Onabot/A intradetrusor injections and who are followed up to 12 wks after treatment
This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing vaginal treatment with the fractional carbon dioxide (fCO2) laser for various urogenital symptoms.
This trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of eCoinTM tibial nerve stimulation in subjects having overactive bladder (OAB) with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). The study will evaluate changes from baseline in OAB symptoms as measured by voiding diaries and patient reported-outcomes through 48 weeks of eCoinTM therapy or 52 weeks of implantation.
- To determine if the T-PTNS is not inferior in the short term (3 months) to one of the usual pharmacological treatments (Solifenacin) in the treatment of hyperactive bladder syndrome and with respect to the percentage of patients that improve 50% any of the 3 signs (Urinary frequency, diurnal / nocturnal frequency, urgency and urinary incontinence). - To determine prognostic factors associated with insufficient improvement (less than 50% in the 3 main signs of hyperactive bladder syndrome (urinary frequency, urgency and urinary incontinence frequency) after treatment with T-PTNS and Solifenacin.