Urethra Stenosis Clinical Trial
— DoVeOfficial title:
DoVe Trial: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Dorsal Onlay Versus Ventral Onlay in Isolated Bulbar Urethral Strictures
NCT number | NCT04551417 |
Other study ID # | BC-06890 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 4, 2020 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2026 |
For bulbar urethral strictures, it remains unclear whether ventral onlay graft urethroplasty is non-inferior to dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty in terms of patency rates.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 240 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | January 1, 2026 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Voluntarily signed written informed consent according to the rules of Good Clinical Practice (Declaration of Helsinki) and national regulations (Appendix B). - Age = 18 years. - Male patient. - Fit for operation, based on the surgeon's expert opinion. - Isolated bulbar urethral stricture confirmed by imaging. - Preputium, penile shaft skin, buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa are allowed as free graft material in the executed dorsal onlay or ventral onlay FGU. - Patient is able and willing to attend the follow-up consultations. Exclusion Criteria: - Absence of signed written informed consent (Appendix B). - Age < 18 years. - Female patients. - Transgender patients. - Patients unfit for operation. - Concomitant urethral strictures at other urethral locations (penile urethra, membranous urethra, prostatic urethra, bladder neck). - A unique urethral stricture at other urethral locations (penile urethra, membranous urethra, prostatic urethra, bladder neck). - Prior bulbar urethroplasty. - Lichen Sclerosus related strictures. - Strictures after failed hypospadias repair. - Patients with neurogenic bladder. - History of pelvic radiation therapy. - Shift of technique to any other technique than dorsal or ventral onlay FGU due to any circumstance (post-hoc exclusion). - Utilization of free graft material other than preputium, penile shaft skin, buccal mucosa or lingual mucosa. - Any condition or situation, which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the patient at significant risk, could confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study. - Patient declares that it will be impossible for him to attend the follow-up consultations. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Ghent University Hospital | Ghent |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital, Ghent |
Belgium,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Failure-free survival after 24 months | Failure is defined as the inability to pass a flexible 16 Fr cystoscope through the reconstructed area without damaging the urethral mucosa. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Change in postoperative erectile function | Assessed with IIEF 5 questionnaire (international index on erectile function: score between 5 and 25, higher scores indicating better erectile function) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in ejaculatory function | Assessed with MSHQ-EjD short form questionnaire (male sexual health questionnaire - ejaculatory dysfunction short form: score between 1 and 15, higher scores indicating better ejaculatory function) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in LUTS | Assessed with Peeling's voiding picture (score between 1 and 4, lower scores indicating better strength of the urinary stream) | Baseline question, followed by question at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in LUTS | Assessed with ICIQ-MLUTS module (international consultation on incontinence questionnaire - male lower urinary tract symptoms: score between 0 and 24, higher scores indicating more LUTS) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in urinary continence | Assessed with ICIQ-UI short form questionnaire (international consultation on incontinence questionnaire - urinary incontinence: score between 0 and 21, higher scores indicating more urinary incontinence) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in maximum flow rate | Assessed with uroflowmetry (Qmax) | Uroflowmetry at baseline, followed by uroflowmetry at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in quality of life | Assessed with EQ-5D-3L (5 questions on quality of life resulting in digit score, e.g. 11231, higher scores indicating worse quality of life) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Change in quality of life | Assessed with EQ-VAS (EQ-visual analogue scale: scale between 0 and 100, higher scores indicating better quality of life) | Baseline questionnaire, followed by questionnaire at 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Assessed with two general patient satisfaction questions | Assessed after 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. | |
Secondary | Postoperative complication rate | Categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system | Within 90 days postoperatively |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04965025 -
Multi-stage Urethroplasty With Augmentation Using a Dorsal Graft Inlay Technique Comparing Graft Use in First or Second Stage
|
N/A |