Umbilical Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Local Repair of Umbilical Hernia in Cirrhotic Patient Using Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Technique
local repair of umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patient using intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique
Umbilical hernia is common in cirrhotic patients suffering from ascites, with a prevalence up
to 20%, which is 10 times higher than in the general population. Ascites is the major
predisposing factor since it causes muscle wasting and increases intra-abdominal pressure. A
unique feature of cirrhosis is low physiologic reserve, which increases the risk of death
from complications of umbilical hernia and makes the patient more vulnerable to perioperative
complications during repair. Because of the high operative risk, umbilical hernia repair has
traditionally been reserved for the most complicated cases, such as strangulation of the
bowel or rupture of the skin with leakage of ascitic fluid Many patients are thus managed
conservatively, with watchful waiting. However, the natural course of umbilical hernia tends
toward complications (eg, bowel incarceration, rupture of the overlying skin), which
necessitate urgent repair. The risk of death with hernia repair in this urgent setting is
seven times higher than for elective hernia repair in cirrhotic patients. More recent data
indicate that elective repair in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis carries
complication and mortality rates similar to those in noncirrhotic patients. Therefore,
patients who should undergo umbilical hernia repair are not only those with complicated
umbilical hernia (strangulation or ascites leak), but also those with well-compensated
cirrhosis at risk of complications. Factors that pose a particularly high risk of
complications of repair are large hernia (> 5 cm), hernia associated with pain, intermittent
incarceration, and trophic alterations of the overlying skin. In these patients, elective
repair should be considered if hepatic function is preserved, if ascites is well managed
(sodium restriction, diuretics, and sometimes even preoperative transjugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunt placement), and if the patient is not expected to undergo liver
transplantation in the near future. If liver transplantation is anticipated in the short
term, umbilical hernia can be managed concomitantly. Management of ascites after umbilical
hernia repair is essential for prevention of recurrence.
Aim of Work This study is aiming to assess the outcome of local repair of umbilical hernia in
cirrhotic patient using intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique
Surgical Steps:
small skin incision over the hernia. Dissection and division the hernia sac
Reduction of the contents of the sac into the abdomen and excision of the redundant hernia
sac.
Insertion of a finger or peanut sponge into the defect to clear the underside of the
peritoneum of adhesions or bowel. Clear enough space around the defect to place a patch twice
the size of the hernia defect.
Complete immersion of the mesh (in sterile saline for 1-3 seconds) immediately prior to
placement in order to maximize the flexibility of the prosthesis.
Insertion of a small retractor into the defect to pull anterior and cephalad to make room for
the mesh. Choose either the small, medium or large patch to insert into the defect. The
chosen patch size should be approximately twice the size of the hernia defect. Gently fold or
roll the patch parallel to the opening between the strap with the barrier side facing out
carefully avoiding any sharp folding or kinking that might compromise the memory ring. Care
should also be taken not to cut or nick the memory recoil ring. Gently insert the patch all
the way through the defect and into the intraabdominal space, using an atraumatic clamp.
Prevent the patch from touching the patients skin.
Remove the clamp and the small retractor. The memory recoil ring will allow the patch to "pop
open." Gently pull up on the looped positioning strap until the patch rests against the
abdominal wall without pulling harder than necessary. This allows the patch to evenly rest
tension-free against the abdominal wall in all four quadrants.
While gently pulling up on the looped positioning strap, use a retractor to peer in between
the anterior portion of the patch and the peritoneum to ensure that no tissue such as a bowel
or omentum is caught between the patch and the abdominal wall Gently separate the two straps
to allow access to the inner positioning pocket to ensure that the patch is lying flat in the
intraabdominal space, against the anterior abdominal wall Utilizing the anterior mesh straps
and pocket, place interrupted U-stitches in a minimum of two quadrants for the small patch
(4.3 cm) and in four quadrants for the medium (6.4 cm) and large (8.0 cm) patches.
Care should be taken to ensure the sutures secure the fascia to the anterior polypropylene
pocket only. For the appropriate amount of sutures follow your surgical judgement and adjust
to specific patient needs.
Use nonabsorbable sutures to secure the patch by suturing the positioning straps to the
margins of the defect. Cut off the excess positioning straps and discard. The patch recoil
technology and abdominal pressure will ensure that the patch lies flat Reapproximate the
fascia and then close the subcutaneous tissues. Lastly, reapproximate the wound
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05994248 -
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Umbilical Hernia Repair (UHR) Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Synthetic Mesh
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03200405 -
Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04206956 -
Anxiety and Chronic Postsurgical Pain Following Ambulatory Surgery in Children
|
||
Completed |
NCT04150796 -
Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00970515 -
Laparoscopic or Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical Hernia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00578136 -
Analgesic Efficacy After Umbilical Hernia Repair in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02782832 -
No Need for Neuromuscular Blockade in Daycase Laparoscopic Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT00351455 -
Watchful Waiting of Incisional Hernias
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06426225 -
Spinal Or General Anesthesia For Umblical Hernia Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01761708 -
Case-control Study of Mesh-infection After a Size Tailored Hernia Repair With C-Qur V-Patch
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01543789 -
The Flemish Umbilical Nitinol Mesh Trial, a Multicenter Trial
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01639118 -
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01201564 -
Comparative Study Matching Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) and Sublay Mesh to Treat Umbilical Hernia
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05920200 -
Factors Influencing the Results of Treatment in Patients With Hernias of Various Localizations
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01421550 -
Conservative Treatment Versus Elective Repair of Umbilical Hernia in Patients With Ascites and Liver Cirrhosis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01398215 -
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): Laparoscopic Assisted Transvaginal Ventral Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT01607801 -
Effect of Reoperation for Recurrence After Open Umbilical Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01665859 -
Risk Factors for Poor Outcome After Epigastric and Umbilical Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT00789230 -
Mesh Versus Suture Repair for Umbilical Hernias
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00245375 -
A Trial Comparing Combination Therapy of Acetaminophen Plus Ibuprofen Versus Tylenol #3 for the Treatment of Pain After Outpatient Surgery
|
N/A |