Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

EcoID is a study designed as an adaptive controlled clinical trial with a first phase of superiority and a second phase of non-inferiority with change of control, of parallel groups, random assignment and blinding of investigators measuring outcome.


Clinical Trial Description

Methodology: Methods, techniques and tools provided. Describe the design, study population, materials, procedures and analysis plan: EcoID is a study designed as an adaptive controlled clinical trial with a first phase of superiority and a second phase of non-inferiority with change of control, of parallel groups, random assignment and blinding of investigators measuring outcome. A Bayesian statistical approach will be used for the analysis and inferences of the information obtained from the clinical trial. The use of an adaptive study is justified given that there is uncertainty if the sequential strategy is superior to palpation, so performing the sequential experiment optimizes sample collection. In case the intervention does not pass phase 1, it is not necessary to expose more patients to compare the intervention by the second control. By using a Bayesian statistical approach, it is possible to use the phase 1 sample as a prior probability distribution. Therefore, the adaptive sample of phase 2 is optimized, achieving the best statistical performance with the least amount of time and resources, benefits found in this type of design The study population will be adult patients of the IPS Universitaria, who accept participation in the study and sign the informed consent. In phase 1 of the study, a comparison will be made between identification of the MCT by palpation and the intervention of identification by the sequential strategy of palpation plus ultrasound, this consists of an assessment by palpation and in the event that the participant is not sure in the identification advances in ultrasound assessment. A sample of 129 patients is calculated for each arm. The superiority of the intervention over palpatory control will be assessed, only if this superiority is demonstrated will advance to phase 2. For phase 2, a comparison will be made between identification of the MCT by routine ultrasound and the intervention of identification by the strategy sequential palpation plus ultrasound. The sample will be calculated based on the results of the first phase, the hypothesis will be to demonstrate that this intervention strategy is not inferior to routine ultrasound. The accuracy of the controls and the intervention will be compared against the ultrasound identification of an airway expert with a CUSUM curve greater than 90%. Materials: - Training activities both in MCT identification strategy by palpation with the laryngeal handshake technique, routine ultrasound to achieve a CUSUM curve > 80% in the participants and training in the sequential strategy. - Mindray M9 ultrasound scanner with linear probe without needle - Yelco gel -Chronometer - UV visible ink marker -Black ink marker ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05535127
Study type Interventional
Source Universidad de Antioquia
Contact Mario A Zamudio, Prof
Phone 3003456596
Email mario.zamudio@udea.edu.co
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date September 2022
Completion date April 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT05303948 - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness N/A
Completed NCT06107751 - Ramped and Sniffing Position for Cesarean Section Intubation. N/A
Completed NCT04089540 - New Intubation Method to Achieve Circulatory Stability and to Reduce Number of Intubation Attempts in Neonates N/A
Completed NCT05522049 - Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03046966 - Manikin To Patient Intubation: Does It Translate? N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05130645 - Evaluation of Mandibular Mental Angle and Mandibular Profile Angle
Completed NCT06042829 - Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate N/A
Completed NCT06138119 - The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Fiberoptic Intubation Performance N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06115694 - Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways N/A
Completed NCT05243758 - Who is Rapid And Success? The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT04833166 - Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient N/A
Completed NCT03118596 - Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs N/A
Recruiting NCT05680909 - Evaluation of SaCo Videolaryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese
Recruiting NCT05429112 - Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP) N/A
Completed NCT05833347 - Evaluation of Difficult Laryngoscopy With Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients
Completed NCT05366582 - Neural Integrity Monitor Electromyogram (NIM-EMG) Endotracheal Tube Intubation With Video Laryngoscope N/A
Recruiting NCT06322719 - Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU N/A
Recruiting NCT06213389 - Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05884645 - Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION)