Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03047122
Other study ID # 0089-16ASMC
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received February 7, 2017
Last updated March 20, 2017
Start date March 1, 2017
Est. completion date December 31, 2018

Study information

Verified date March 2017
Source Assuta Medical Center
Contact Michal Guindy, MD
Phone +972-50-8800102
Email micahlgu@assuta.co.il
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Mammography is considered the standard imaging method for breast cancer screening, and is known to result in reduced mortality from breast cancer. However, the diagnostic yield of mammography depends particularly on breast tissue density, with sensitivity as low as 30-48% in dense-breast women. Ultrasound is an attractive adjunct imaging method to mammography as it is widely accessible, relatively inexpensive and well-tolerated by patients. The addition of hand-held ultrasound to mammography has been demonstrated to significantly increase breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts. It is however dependent on the expertise and skill of the operator.

In recent years, the FDA has approved the use of the automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) for use in screening of women with dense breast. Unlike handheld ultrasound, the ABUS is relatively simple to use, necessitating less technical training, and results in higher reproducibility.

The research aim is to evaluation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) regarding the detection and classification of breast lesions, compared to hand-held ultrasound, according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. The investigator will also evaluate parameters regarding patients' comfort, workflow, and duration of image interpretation.


Description:

ABUS produces a 3D volume acquisition using a 6-15 Mega Herz reverse curve transducer. Images are digitally reformatted on a dedicated workstation to produce axial, sagittal and coronal reformatted images. Unlike handheld ultrasound, the ABUS is relatively simple to use, necessitating less technical training, and results in higher reproducibility. Previous studies have shown that automated breast ultrasound is very well tolerated by patients can be useful in detection of solid and cystic lesions and in evaluating tumor extent preoperatively.

Automated breast ultrasound will be performed on the "Invenia ABUS" (Automated Breast Ultrasound System) designed for automated breast imaging by General Electric (GE) Healthcare. Images will be acquired using a 15 centimeter field-of-view reverse curve ultra-broadband transducer of 6-15 Mega Herz. Using mechanical compression assist, the transducer is placed on each breast and six volumes are acquired with six sweeps (right anterior-posterior, right lateral, right medial; left anterior-posterior, left lateral, left medial). Acquisition time expected 15 minutes per patient, approximately 30-40 second acquisition per volume.

ABUS examinations will be performed by the investigators institution's radiographers, with variable degrees of experience in performing hand-held breast ultrasound examinations (HHUS).

Reformatted images and volumes will be view on a designated workstation of 2 megapixel high resolution monitor, using customized hanging protocols, multi-slice 3D viewing and patented clinical algorithms. Interpretation of images will be done by our institution's breast imaging radiologists with more than 15 years of experience in performing and reading hand-held breast ultrasound studies.

Each breast will be assigned a final ABUS BI-RADS score according to the American College of Radiology classification ranging from 1 to 6. A discrepancy between the ABUS Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System score and the hand-held ultrasound BI-RADS score (HHUS BI-RADS 1-2 & ABUS BI-RADS >2, or HHUS BI-RADS >3 & ABUS BI-RADS 1-2) will result in the referral of the woman to second-look hand-held ultrasound to determine the reason for the mismatch.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1200
Est. completion date December 31, 2018
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 25 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Women referred to hand-held screening ultrasound examination (BI-RADS=1/2). Women scheduled to undergo ultrasound-guided needle biopsy due to suspicious breast mass detected during hand-held ultrasound (BI-RADS>2).

Exclusion Criteria:

Women under 25 years.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Israel Assuta Medical Centers Tel Aviv

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assuta Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (11)

ACR BI-RADS Atlas 5th Edition, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 2013

Brem RF, Lenihan MJ, Lieberman J, Torrente J. Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):234-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12072. Review. — View Citation

Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Kim SJ. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data. Acta Radiol. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):8-14. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100179. — View Citation

Drukker K, Horsch KJ, Pesce LL, Giger ML. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul;20(7):847-53. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.02.007. — View Citation

Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):734-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y. — View Citation

Lander MR, Tabár L. Automated 3-D breast ultrasound as a promising adjunctive screening tool for examining dense breast tissue. Semin Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;46(4):302-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2011.06.003. Review. — View Citation

Prosch H, Halbwachs C, Strobl C, Reisner LM, Hondl M, Weber M, Mostbeck GH. [Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort]. Ultraschall Med. 2011 Oct;32(5):504-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273414. German. — View Citation

Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):404-12. doi: 10.1177/0284185114528835. — View Citation

Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography. Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Dec;28(10):771-3. doi: 10.1007/s11604-010-0499-9. — View Citation

Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. Rofo. 2008 Sep;180(9):804-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027563. — View Citation

Zintsmaster BS, Morrison J, Sharman S, Shah BA. Differences in pain perceptions between automated breast ultrasound and digital screening mammography. J Diag Med Sonography 2013;29(2):62-65.

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary ability to identify all US breast findings correctly. The investigators will compare all lesions detected by abus and hand held US to pathology when present . 6 month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04095143 - Ultrasound Markers of Organ Congestion in Severe Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting NCT05114551 - ICU Predictive Score of WEaning Success in Patients At Risk of Extubation Failure
Completed NCT04853290 - Patient Experience in Peripheral Venipuncture With and Without Ultrasound N/A
Completed NCT04853264 - Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Catheterization Increases First-attempt Success Rate N/A
Recruiting NCT02556541 - Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Vascular Access in Children N/A
Completed NCT02801058 - Ultrasound Evaluation of Changes in Diaphragm Induced by Osteopathic Manipulative Techniques N/A
Completed NCT01219257 - Longitudinal ULtrasonographic Study of Patients With Spondylarthritis Starting Biological Therapy
Recruiting NCT01282528 - Ultrasonographic Monitoring of Response to Infliximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT04114812 - Near-peer Tutoring Compared With a Standard Faculty-led Course for Undergraduate Training in Abdominal Ultrasound. N/A
Completed NCT05519358 - Midsagittal Tongue Measurement to Predict Difficult Airways
Completed NCT02741453 - Bilateral Internal Jugular Veins Ultrasound Scanning Prior to CVC Placement N/A
Recruiting NCT06255808 - Development of Assist Tool for Breast Examination Using the Principle of Ultrasonic Sensor
Not yet recruiting NCT06001242 - The Relationship Between Upper Extremity Explosive Power and Trunk Muscles in Volleyball Players
Completed NCT03316352 - Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients N/A
Completed NCT03764111 - Comparing an Inexpensive Handheld Ultrasound Machine and a Large Mobile Ultrasound System
Completed NCT00971750 - Laparoscopic Versus Transabdominal Ultrasound in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Completed NCT03314519 - Lung Ultrasonography vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Aiding Lung Collapse in Patient Using Double Lumen Tube N/A
Completed NCT03697902 - Influence of Imaging Angle in Measurement of Cisterna Magna
Not yet recruiting NCT05497661 - Ultrasound Patellar Tendon Assessment N/A