View clinical trials related to Ulcer.
Filter by:The study is designed to investigate efficacy and safety of CU104 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.
The investigators hope that the present study will highlight new transcriptomic prognostic markers of response to Ustekinumab with the ultimate goal of individualizing treatment and making a more targeted selection of UC patients who will benefit from this biological agent.
Although the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease is stable in North American and European countries, the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease is increasing in newly industrialized countries, especially in China. The treatment drugs for ulcerative colitis include 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and biological agents. The aim of this exploratory Clinical Trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ulcerative colitis.
In this medical trial, a novel prototype of a medical device based on a Cold Atmospheric Air Plasma Jet for the treatment is clinically tested on patients with venous leg ulcers. The device is characterized by producing the first cold air plasma jet compatible with living tissues at a low heat transfer rate with a temperature on the skin surface lower than 40 ºC. It has a practical design to be used by physicians during daily practice with a special focus on unhealed ulcers.
Study is to provide evidence comparing AQUACEL® Ag+ Extra™ versus Cutimed® Sorbact® in the progression of wounds towards healing
This is a prospective interventional study exploring the modifiability of physiological metrics, namely Heart Rate Variability (HRV), using a 5-week standardized HRV biofeedback intervention in subjects with symptomatic ulcerative colitis. Participants will be followed for 17 weeks. The goal is the understand if modifying these markers can impact ulcerative colitis related symptoms.
In a single-blind, crossover, randomized, controlled trial with 40 participants we aim to demonstrate superior anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% (IMP2) gel over EMLA 5% cream (IMP1) at comparable safety in sharp wound debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This is a monocentric investigator initiated trial conducted in the University Hospital Zurich. In this longitudinal trial, participants receive a sequence of different treatments (treatments on different days) and therefore are randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One-half of participants will first receive IMP1 (first treatment visit, randomized) and then IMP2 (second treatment visit, crossover); the other half of participants the reverse sequence (first treatment visit: IMP2, second treatment visit: IMP1). Primary Objective: We want to show that IMP 2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel) is more effective in pain reduction than IMP 1 (EMLA® 5% cream) in sharp wound debridement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out the changes in peak pressure and pressure-time integral after twelve weeks from the initial utility of foot insoles and eight weeks later as a follow-up in diabetic foot ulcers. Participants will be randomly assigned to foot insole, medication, and wound care (study group) or medication and wound care (control group).
Supra SDRM® is FDA-cleared as a dressing for treating partial and full-thickness wounds. It is a dermal substitute that provides a barrier and an ECM-like structure to help accelerate wound healing. SUPRA SDRM® has 510k approval for partial and full-thickness wounds and has shown promising results in preliminary animal studies. The purpose of this clinical evaluation is to collect and compare outcomes data from patients with UT 1A diabetic foot ulcers treated with a commercially available dermal substitute, Supra SDRM®, as compared to an advanced standard of care (Fibracol Plus). Patient outcomes, including time to heal, healing by 12 weeks, direct costs, and infection rate, will be compared at the end of the study.
A clinical trial will be carried out comparing the efficacy of PICO system based on negative pressure therapy (NPT) in adults with chronic ulcers compared to conventional treatments.