View clinical trials related to Type1diabetes.
Filter by:An experimental mechanistic study. The overall objective is to gain new knowledge about mechanisms involved in adaptation to recurrent hypoglycaemia in diabetes by investigating patients with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. The knowledge to be obtained may feed into experimental hypoglycaemic clamp studies to further elucidate the effect of the adaptations during acute hypoglycaemia. Ultimately, it may lead to intervention studies aiming at the maintenance of functional capability during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes to reduce their risk of severe hypoglycaemia.
The primary aim of this pilot study is to test whether low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) instituted in children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can improve their disease control. The primary objective of the trial is the change in continuous glucose monitoring time in target range 3.9-10.0 mmol/l (TIR) in a 5-week period on LCD as opposed to a 5-week period on recommended carbohydrate diet (RCD). Secondary objectives are: Changes in immune parameters during the LCD period; Differences in fecal microbiome during the LCD period; Differences in fecal, serum and urine metabolome during the LCD period;
This is an observational study, in which newborn infants from the general population are screened at birth for HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. The participants carrying genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes (approximately 9.5%) will be analyzed for diabetes-associated autoantibodies at the age of 1, 2 and 3 years, while those predisposed to celiac disease (about 14%) will be screened for tissue transglutaminase antibodies at the age of 1 and 3 years. The intention is to screen annually 10,400 newborn infants for a period of 3 years. About 988 infants are each year identified as a child at risk for type 1 diabetes, and it is expected that around 80% of the families with such a child are willing to join the autoantibody screening. Approximately 1456 infants are each year recognized as a child at risk for celiac disease, and again the expectation is that 80% of the families will join the antibody screening program.
Open single armed study to investigate safety and feasibility of administrating autologous T regulatory cells at the time of allogenic islet transplantation.
Celiac disease shares many features of other autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes. Recently, it was published that higher amounts of gluten intake increased the risk for celiac disease. Optimal amounts of gluten to be introduced during weaning have not yet been established. The aim is to investigate if a gluten-restricted diet (e.g. below 3 gram per day) during the first 3 years of life will reduce the risk of develop CDA and IA in genetically predisposed children by the age of 7 years. Children who screened positive for HLA DQ2/X (X is neither DQ2 nor DQ8) in the GPPAD-02 (ASTR1D [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03316261]) screening will be contacted by a study nurse.
The investigators aim to further the understanding of environmental factors that underlie the development of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and the post-onset disease trajectory. Dysbiosis, defined as alterations in intestinal microbiota composition and function, has been hypothesized to increase the risk of developing T1D in those with genetic susceptibility. Dysbiosis may result from modern dietary habits, such as broad consumption of the highly processed Western Diet, or by widespread use of antibiotics. Here, the investigators propose to examine the impact of dysbiosis on the endogenous innate inflammatory state that potentiates T1D progression. The investigators hypothesize that probiotic-induced alterations in the intestinal microbiota may favorably alter the post-onset disease state.
The goal of DIATAG study is the identification of biomarkers of T1D evolution in a pediatric cohort.
An open label, parallel single centre trial of Wharton's Jelly derived allogenic mesenchymal stromal cells repeated treatment to preserve endogenous insulin production in adult patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes
The scientific basis for dietary recommendations in type 1 diabetes is almost lacking, with the current recommendations being based on type 2 diabetes studies. Therefore the overall purpose of this study is to improve the current evidence for dietary recommendations to people with type 1 diabetes. Study aim: To compare how a strictly low carbohydrate diet, a moderately low carbohydrate diet and a traditional diabetes diet (with higher amounts of carbohydrates) affect insulin requirements and metabolic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Carbohydrate intake is 50-60% of the total energy intake in the traditional diabetes diet, 30-40% in the moderately low carbohydrate diet and 15-20% in the strictly low carbohydrate diet with a minimum of 50 g carbohydrates/day. A diet with less than 50 g carbohydrates/day is usually called very low carbohydrate diet or ketogenic and will not be tested in this study. Those who wish to participate and meet the inclusion criteria (and none of the exclusion criteria) will be randomized to one of the three diets. The duration of the intervention is 6 months after which the participants will be able to choose their own diet for another 6 months. The main study visits are at baseline (screening and study start), 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Shorter visits will be at 3 and 6 weeks. The participants will meet with a study nurse, dietitian and doctor. They will attend two carbohydrate counting courses before the start of the intervention in order to be able to match their insulin to the amount carbohydrates they eat. Participants will receive written materials about their diets with menus and recipes for better adherence to the diet. The primary endpoint is the change in insulin requirements within and between groups (for secondary endpoints please see relevant section). For assessing the different endpoints the participants will provide blood, urine and feces samples for lab analyses as well as register their insulin use, blood glucose, diet, physical activity and any blood ketones or hypoglycemia electronically or in written forms. Continuous/flash glucose monitoring (CGM/FGM) will be also used. Dietary assessment and adherence will be based on 3-4 day food diaries before every scheduled study visit.
Type 1 diabetes is associated with a significant increase in mortality, cardiovascular disease, injuries on eyes and kidneys. These risks are largely dependent on glycemic control. Multiple strategies of achieving good glycemic control exist. Despite this, only about 20 % of patients in Sweden reach the target HbA1c of ≤ 52 mmol/mol. It is well-known that when the motivation is high, a large proportion of patients reach good glycaemic control with current treatments, e.g. most pregnant women reach a much better glycaemic control. The patient is then motivated to a greater extent in managing the disease, e.g. by carefully dosing insulin and more closely monitoring blood glucose levels. Moreover, besides lack of motivation, specific psychiatric conditions are well-known barriers in being compliant with treatments such as depression, eating disorders and attention deficit disorders (ADHD). Further, identified specific diabetes-related psychosocial factors include severe fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetes-burnout, unrealistic treatment goals, poor relationship with physician, feelings of powerlessness and treatment skepticism. These parameters can be measured via a diabetes distress scale where a high score is correlated to higher HbA1c. The majority of outpatient diabetes clinics in Sweden today request the resource of a diabetes-educated psychologist. However, more evidence is needed from randomized multicentre trials whether such a resource would help to improve HbA1c, reduce diabetes-related distress and improve quality of life. The primary aim of the current study is to evaluate whether the assistance of a diabetes-educated psychologist in the diabetes care of patients with type 1 diabetes improves HbA1c. Secondary endpoints include studying its influence on diabetes-related distress and quality of life. The study is a 1 year randomized trial where the intervention group will meet with a diabetes-educated psychologist in addition to conventional care.