Evaluation of Jejunal Placement of Enteral Feeding Tubes

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the success rate of jejunal tube placement comparing the endoscopic versus the electromagnetic method in a comparative ICU patient population. The investigators hypothesized that success rate of the electromagnetic jejunal tube placement will be lower than the success rate of the endoscopic method.

Clinical Trial Description

Clinical studies have shown that up to 62,8% of patients receiving EN have gastrointestinal complications like high gastric residuals (≥200ml), vomiting, abdominal distension and regurgitation. These complications lead to interruptions of the EN, which result in a low caloric intake of the patient.

In order to avoid at least some of these complications the ACCP consensus statement recommends small bowel feeding if gastric residual volumes of 150ml or higher occur. The Canadian clinical practice guidelines recommend acceptance of gastric residual volumes up to 250 ml, use of prokinetic agents and jejunal feeding for patients, who are at high risk for intolerance of EN (on inotropes, sedatives, paralytic agents). When gastric enteral nutrition is insufficient despite acceptance of high gastric residual volumes and use of prokinetic agents, small bowel feeding is the best method to nevertheless feed the patient enterally because it is associated with a significant decrease of reflux, a reduced risk of aspiration and an adequate caloric intake.

For small bowel feeding the placement of a jejunal feeding tube is necessary. There are several possibilities to place the tube in the small bowel. An excellent method still is endoscopy, which has a success rate up to 98% and moreover allows an evaluation of the upper GI-tract concerning pathologies. However, it is a rather time consuming procedure, which is of limited availability and requires trained staff. As more simple alternatives unguided tubes and their placement in the small bowel were tested and showed success rates up to 75% only. One of these alternatives is a jejunal feeding tube, which is placed using an electromagnetic sensing technique to visualize the placement process on a bedside monitor (CORTRAK™). The aim of this study is the evaluation of the success rate of jejunal tube placement comparing the endoscopic versus the electromagnetic method in a comparative ICU patient population. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00500851
Study type	Interventional
Source	Medical University of Vienna
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 2007
Completion date	February 2009

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04551508` - Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study
Recruiting	`NCT06037928` - Plasma Sodium and Sodium Administration in the ICU
Completed	`NCT03671447` - Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03941002` - Continuous Evaluation of Diaphragm Function	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04674657` - Does Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Alter Antiinfectives Therapy Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients
Completed	`NCT04239209` - Effect of Intensivist Communication on Surrogate Prognosis Interpretation	N/A
Completed	`NCT05531305` - Longitudinal Changes in Muscle Mass After Intensive Care	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03335124` - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02916004` - The Use of Nociception Flexion Reflex and Pupillary Dilatation Reflex in ICU Patients.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05883137` - High-flow Nasal Oxygenation for Apnoeic Oxygenation During Intubation of the Critically Ill
Completed	`NCT04479254` - The Impact of IC-Guided Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients (The IC-Study)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04475666` - Replacing Protein Via Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04538469` - Absent Visitors: The Wider Implications of COVID-19 on Non-COVID Cardiothoracic ICU Patients, Relatives and Staff
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04516395` - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04043091` - Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02989051` - Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry	Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT02922998` - CD64 and Antibiotics in Human Sepsis	N/A
Completed	`NCT02899208` - Can an Actigraph be Used to Predict Physical Function in Intensive Care Patients?	N/A
Completed	`NCT03048487` - Protein Consumption in Critically Ill Patients
Recruiting	`NCT02163109` - Oxygen Consumption in Critical Illness

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.