Clinical Trials Logo

Tube Feeding clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Tube Feeding.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03459209 Completed - Human Milk Clinical Trials

Effect of Tube Feeding on LCPUFAs Delivery

Start date: April 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) docosahexaenoic (DHA) arachidonic acid (AA) are major building blocks for the lipid bilayer of neuronal and retinal membranes and play a crucial role in brain and visual development. Humans lack enzymes synthetizing DHA and AA precursors and thus rely upon dietary sources to achieve adequate intakes. Human milk (HM) feeding, either own mother's milk (OMM) or donor milk (DM), is the first nutritional choice for preterm infants and provides appropriate LCPUFAs amounts to support neurological and visual development of this fragile population. Due to their immaturity, preterm infants are often unable to coordinate sucking and swallowing, thus requiring tube feeding (TF) for prolonged time periods. During TF, fatty acids tend to separate from aqueous milk components and to adhere to the infusion set, thus reducing the delivery of HM lipid contents. To dare, however, a targeted evaluation of TF-related LCPUFAs losses has not been performed. This study aims to quantitatively assess, by means of gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, the effect of bolus and different continuous feeding methods routinely adopted for preterm infants' enteral nutrition on the delivery of DHA and AA contained in human milk samples.

NCT ID: NCT03262493 Completed - Adult Clinical Trials

Feeding Tube Attachment Device Versus Conventional Fixation and Its Impact on Accidental Exit of Enteral Feeding Tubes

Start date: June 14, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Enteral nutritional therapy, fed through the gastrointestinal tract via a catheter, tube, catheter, or stoma, delivers the nutrients distally to the oral cavity and may reduce intrahospital malnutrition. Enteral probes are inserted, at the bedside, through the nose or mouth into the stomach or duodenum. Among the main complications of the use enteral probes, we can mention: displacement of the probe and administration of diet in the respiratory tract or microaspirations. To prevent displacement, enteral probes are attached to the skin on the nose or forehead by the use of micropore-type adhesive. In the probe the adhesive tape is put in the form of "tie" and again fixed to the nose of the patient. The enteral probes displacement rates with this technique are around 62%; in addition, the adhesive tape can cause discomfort, nasal necrosis, skin lesions and skin sensitivity reactions to the patient. More recently the nasal bridle, an anchor of the enteral feeding tube located around the nasal septum or nasal septum, has been described as more effective in securing enteral probes position over traditional tape attachment, but is not available in our environment. In Brazil, the feeding tube attachment device (FTAD) is available. Until now, the performance of FTAD in relation to enteral probe safety and accidental exit rates has not been described in the literature. Material's FTAD is composed of a layer of hydrocolloid that is adhered to the skin on the back of the nose and a polyurethane clamp that secures the enteral probe. Thus, there was a need to evaluate the actual success in using the traditional mode of probe attachment. It should be noted that very little scientific evidence is available in the literature on such care, and this is due to the lack of well-designed studies on the subject.

NCT ID: NCT00500851 Completed - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Jejunal Placement of Enteral Feeding Tubes

Start date: May 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the success rate of jejunal tube placement comparing the endoscopic versus the electromagnetic method in a comparative ICU patient population. The investigators hypothesized that success rate of the electromagnetic jejunal tube placement will be lower than the success rate of the endoscopic method.