Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04037813 |
Other study ID # |
140689 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 15, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
September 15, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic tubal occlusion for
the patients of communicating hydrosalpinx scheduled for IVF. half of the patients will
undergo hysteroscopic tubal occlusion while the other half will undergo laparoscopic tubal
occlusion.
Description:
The study will include 108 patients complaining of infertility associated with unilateral or
bilateral tubal communicating hydrosalpinx. All the patients will be subjected to informed
consent, history taking, full physical examination, ultrasound examination via transvaginal
approach using ultrasound machine ( Voluson Pro-V and GE Voluson E 10) and HSG within the
last 6 months showing unilateral or bilateral communicating hydrosalpinx.
The patients (108) will be equally randomized into two groups :
Group (A): 54 patients (Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion group). Group (B): 54 patients
(Laparoscopic tubal occlusion group). Randomization will be done using 108 opaque sealed
envelopes that will be numbered serially from 1-108 and each envelope corresponding letter
which denotes the allocated group will be put according to randomization table then all
envelopes will be closed and put in one box, when the first patient arrives, after giving
informed consent, the first envelope will be opened and the patient will be allocated
according to the letter inside.
For hysteroscopic tubal occlusion group it will be done under general anesthesia using
standard, rigid 4-mm hysteroscopy with a 30° forward-oblique lens and a 5.5-mm diagnostic
sheath (Karl Storz , Germany). Uterine distension allowed a panoramic view of the uterine
cavity and identification of the tubal ostia.The roller ball (Ball Electrode, unipolar, 5 Fr)
will be used for the coagulation of the interstitial part of the tube and the uterine cornu
area.
For laparoscopic tubal occlusion group it will be done under general anesthesia using bipolar
coagulation and a proximal tubal cut. The contraindications for laparoscopy were mainly
extensive abdominal or pelvic adhesions of various etiologies (e.g. previous surgery, pelvic
inflammatory disease, and pelvic endometriosis) and morbid obesity.
The operative details of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and laparoscopic tubal occlusion
including operative time and complications will be documented In both groups, the patients
will be followed up for the next 24 hours as regard post-operative pain (using VAS ) and
post-operative recovery (patient mobilization, intestinal motility and patient discharge).
The success rate of tubal occlusion will be assessed one month later using post-menstrual HSG
and for hysteroscopic group office hysteroscopy will be done for assessment of uterine cavity
after electrocoagulation.