Tubal Obstruction Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Premedication Hyoscine-N-butylbromide Before Hysterosalpingography for Diagnosis of Proximal Tubal Obstruction in Infertile Women : A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
Verified date | November 2016 |
Source | Mahidol University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study finds premedication Hyoscine-N-butylbromide before hysterosalpingography have a potential effect for diagnosis of proximal tubal obstruction in infertile women. The investigators did a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 146 |
Est. completion date | April 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 19 Years to 42 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - The infertile women who indicated for investigation hysterosalpingography were enrolled. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Known sensitivity to Hyoscine or contrast media 2. Genital tract infection 3. Suspected pregnancy 4. Abnormal uterine bleeding |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Thailand | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University | Had Yai | Songkhla |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mahidol University |
Thailand,
Alper MM, Garner PR, Spence JE. Hyoscine butylbromide to relieve utero-tubal obstruction at hysterosalpingography. Br J Radiol. 1985 Sep;58(693):915. — View Citation
Hajishafiha M, Zobairi T, Zanjani VR, Ghasemi-Rad M, Yekta Z, Mladkova N. Diagnostic value of sonohysterography in the determination of fallopian tube patency as an initial step of routine infertility assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Dec;28(12):1671-7. — View Citation
Hindocha A, Beere L, O'Flynn H, Watson A, Ahmad G. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 20;(9):CD006106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006106.pub3. Review. — View Citation
Jareethum R, Suksompong S, Petyim S, Prechapanich J, Laokirkkiat P, Choavaratana R. Efficacy of mefenamic acid and hyoscine for pain relief during saline infusion sonohysterography in infertile women: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.021. Epub 2010 Dec 30. — View Citation
Kemp JH. "Buscopan" in spasmodic dysmenorrhoea. Curr Med Res Opin. 1972;1(1):19-25. — View Citation
Kodaman PH, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;16(3):221-9. Review. — View Citation
Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 30;(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3. Review. — View Citation
Moore DE. Pain associated with hysterosalpingography: Ethiodol versus Salpix media. Fertil Steril. 1982 Nov;38(5):629-31. — View Citation
Moro F, Selvaggi L, Sagnella F, Morciano A, Martinez D, Gangale MF, Ciardulli A, Palla C, Uras ML, De Feo E, Boccia S, Tropea A, Lanzone A, Apa R. Could antispasmodic drug reduce pain during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) in infertile patients? A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):260-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.11089. — View Citation
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):e44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Review. — View Citation
Rohwer AC, Khondowe O, Young T. Antispasmodics for labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;(6):CD009243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009243.pub3. Review. — View Citation
Steinkeler JA, Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Hillstrom MM. Female infertility: a systematic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1353-70. doi: 10.1148/rg.295095047. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | number result diagnosis of proximal tubal occlusion | To evaluate rate diagnosis of proximal tubal occlusion compare between Hyoscine group and placebo group before HSG. | up to 24 weeks | |
Secondary | number of true occlusion or false occlusion | To evaluate false positive results of proximal tubal occlusion from HSG compare between study and control groups. | up to 24 weeks | |
Secondary | number of participants with treatment-related adverse effects of drug and procedure | such as dizziness, syncope, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, pelvic pain, bleeding | up to 24 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03891537 -
Neural Therapy Effect and Bilateral Tubal Ligation
|
||
Completed |
NCT04037813 -
Hysteroscopic Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Occlusion in Cases of Hydrosalpinx and Planning for IVF
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01838122 -
Prevalence of HbA1C in Women With PCOS
|
N/A |