Comparative Effectiveness of the Two Splints in Trigger Finger

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

RME orthosis is recommended for the treatment of trigger finger. However, its efficacy has not been studied in trigger finger patients. Given the increasing popularity of this orthosis among clinicians, it is important to evaluate their effectiveness to provide evidence for its use in trigger finger. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a 6-week orthotic intervention in a randomly selected group of patients with trigger finger using MCP-blocking and RME orthoses.

Clinical Trial Description

Generally, three types of orthoses are used in the treatment of trigger finger. Some authors used MCP blocking orthosis, while others used DIP or PIP blocking orthosis. Comparative studies are quite limited, as only one study comparing two orthotic designs found that the MCP blocking orthosis was more effective than the DIP blocking orthosis.The MCP blocking orthosis, which restricts the MCP joint to 10-15° of flexion, is commonly used in the conservative treatment of trigger finger.An RME orthosis could be an alternative orthotic treatment option for trigger finger because it holds the MCP in an extended position. The RME orthosis is thought to prevent flexion of the affected finger, thereby limiting tendon glide. This reduces the pressure on the A1 pulley, allowing the tendon to glide more smoothly, reducing the likelihood of triggering. Despite limiting motion,the orthosis still allows the patient to perform daily activities with the orthosis. Therefore, positioning the MCP joint in extension could provide additional benefits in trigger finger. The relative motion orthosis is a new orthotic design that positions the affected finger in 10-15 degrees of extension relative to the adjacent fingers.It also has several advantages, including small size, low-profile design, easy and inexpensive fabrication, and better patient compliance. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a 6-week orthotic intervention for pain relief in a randomly selected group of patients with TF using the MCP blocking orthosis and the RME orthosis. The secondary objective was to determine the comparative effectiveness of the orthoses on function and satisfaction with the orthosis. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05942443
Study type	Interventional
Source	Hacettepe University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	June 1, 2021
Completion date	May 1, 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04094389` - Comparison of Trigger Finger Orthotic Wearing Schedules	N/A
Completed	`NCT05435950` - Clinical Investigation on Safety, Performance and Effectiveness of Sono-instruments	N/A
Completed	`NCT04900220` - Differences in Flare Reaction Incidence and Intensity Following Trigger Finger Injections	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04354415` - Tourniquet vs. No Tourniquet for Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Release	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06296017` - Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Physiotherapy Applications in Trigger Finger Treatment	N/A
Completed	`NCT06288685` - Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT06382623` - Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04568993` - The TriggerHappy Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT04023695` - Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT04645303` - Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger	Early Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT03156829` - Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01987115` - Comparison of Fascial Manipulation With Traditional Physiotherapy for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers	N/A
Completed	`NCT01950793` - A Comparison Between Sonoguided Injection Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Treatment of Trigger Finger	N/A
Completed	`NCT02196233` - Surgical Treatment of Adult Trigger Finger
Recruiting	`NCT04675892` - Resection of Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon for Severe Trigger Fingers	N/A
Terminated	`NCT05082480` - Evaluate the Effectiveness of Crosslinked HA on the Adhesion Preventing After Trigger Finger Release Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05045157` - Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01886157` - Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00951236` - Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04855942` - Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.