Trigger Finger Clinical Trial
Official title:
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: a Randomized Controlled Study
Verified date | July 2022 |
Source | Cheng-Hsin General Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Trigger finger is the common name of stenosing tenosynovitis of fingers, caused by repetitive trauma. Conservative treatment includes NSAIDs or other analgesic agents, activity modification, splint, and physiotherapy. Operation could be considered if conservative treatments fails. With literature reviewed, there is no treatment which is both non-invasive and effective, and also could avoid recurrence well. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy could induce angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory reaction, and recruitment of fibroblast. Although extracorporeal shock wave has been utilized in musculoskeletal diseases for more than twenty years, there is no well-designed clinical trial to prove the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave in treating trigger finger. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with traditional physical therapy for the management of trigger finger.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | August 31, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Quinnel classification grade 2 or 3 - who has only one trigger Exclusion Criteria: - who had ever treated the trigger finger - who has other musculoskeletal disease of the upper limb - who has severe coagulopathy disease - who is pregnant - who has arrhythmia or has a pacemaker - there is sensory impairment, scar, edema at the trigger finger - who has cognitive dysfunction |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cheng-Hsin General Hospital |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Quinnell stages of triggering | Quinnell stages of triggering classifies the trigger finger using five types during flexion and extension: normal movement (Type 0), uneven movement (Type I), actively correctable (Type II), passively correctable (Type III) and fixed deformity (Type IV). | 15 weeks | |
Primary | 11-point numeric scale of pain | The 11-point numeric scale of pain requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. | 15 weeks | |
Primary | Chinese quick DASH (disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire) | This questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The investigators chose the first two components: the disability and symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5). The lower score means better condition of upper limbs, and vice versa. | 15 weeks | |
Primary | strength of hand grip | The strength of hand grip is to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles by a electicial grip strength device. | 15 weeks | |
Primary | sonographic image | The investigators would record the characteristics of acquired sonographic images, such like the thickness of finger flexor tendon and A1 pulley, the presence of tendon sheath effusion, and the presence of increased vascularity by Doppler images. | 15 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04094389 -
Comparison of Trigger Finger Orthotic Wearing Schedules
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05435950 -
Clinical Investigation on Safety, Performance and Effectiveness of Sono-instruments
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04900220 -
Differences in Flare Reaction Incidence and Intensity Following Trigger Finger Injections
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06401473 -
Using the Gate Control Theory of Pain to Decrease Pain During Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injections
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04354415 -
Tourniquet vs. No Tourniquet for Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Release
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06296017 -
Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06288685 -
Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06382623 -
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04568993 -
The TriggerHappy Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04023695 -
Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04645303 -
Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03156829 -
Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01987115 -
Comparison of Fascial Manipulation With Traditional Physiotherapy for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01950793 -
A Comparison Between Sonoguided Injection Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Treatment of Trigger Finger
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02196233 -
Surgical Treatment of Adult Trigger Finger
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04675892 -
Resection of Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon for Severe Trigger Fingers
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT05082480 -
Evaluate the Effectiveness of Crosslinked HA on the Adhesion Preventing After Trigger Finger Release Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05045157 -
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01886157 -
Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00951236 -
Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger
|
N/A |