View clinical trials related to Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Filter by:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the transcatheter tricuspid valve ring system produced by Shanghai Huihe Medical Technology Co., Ltd. in the treatment of patients with severe or above tricuspid regurgitation who cannot be evaluated by clinicians for surgery.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was identified as an independent prognostic factor associated with excess mortality and morbidity, independent of left ventricular (LV) function and pulmonary hypertension. Isolated tricuspid surgery has been performed for a long time in a few selected cases, however in recent years several studies have underlined how the poor outcomes described for isolated tricuspid valve surgery seem to be related to the baseline characteristics of the patients and to late referral for surgical treatment rather than the intervention itself. To facilitate patient screening, a new clinical and functional TR staging system has recently been proposed. This classification, which evaluates the progression of morphological variations of the tricuspid valve and right ventricle (RV) in association with the onset of symptoms, identifies several parameters and factors that can be useful for a better stratification of surgical risk. Rather than simply assessing the degree of TR, this new staging mechanism also focuses on symptoms, RV remodeling and function, medical therapy, and right heart failure hospitalizations. Investigators previously focused on the short-term (mainly hospital) outcomes of patients undergoing isolated surgery for severe TR, who were classified at baseline according to this clinical and functional staging system. Results showed that a more comprehensive classification reflects the population and hospital outcomes of surgically treated patients with isolated TR. The purpose of this study is to ultimately evaluate long-term outcomes of this patients population and estimate the impact of baseline staging on long-term outcomes.
The purpose of this study to identify the efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors add-on treatment on right ventricular remodeling and the amount of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with isolated severe TR.
This study is a prospective design. Patients are severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (≥ 3+) who remained clinically symptomatic after guideline-directed medical treatment. After signing an informed consent form, subjects are enrolled and treated with the DragonFly-T Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair System. All subjects receive clinical follow-up immediately after the procedure, before discharge, 30 days after the procedure, 6 months after the procedure, 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after the procedure. The incidence of MAEs (Major Adverse Events) at 30 days is used as the safety endpoint. The MAEs include stroke, cardiovascular death, new renal failure, endocarditis requiring surgery, and non-elective cardiovascular interventions due to device-related adverse events. The efficacy endpoints include acute procedural success, acute device success, the incidence of all-cause mortality and/or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months after the procedure, the percentage of patients with tricuspid regurgitation of 2+ or less, the percentage of patients with tricuspid regurgitation reduced by at least one grade, the improvement in 6 minutes walk test, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life change as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score and change in edema scale grading.
This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing transesophageal echocardiography + fluoroscopy guided lead implantation vs. standard lead implantation guided by fluoroscopy only. Patients are randomized 1:1 in the two groups and followed up for up to 3 years.
Tricuspid regurgitation is common in patients with severe left heart diseases, such as degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the evidence base is insufficient to inform a decision about whether to perform concomitant tricuspid-valve repair during left heart surgery in patients who have mild tricuspid regurgitation. To inform decision making, we will conduct a multicenter, randomized trial to assess the benefits and risks of tricuspid-valve repair at the time of left heart diseases in patients with mild tricuspid regurgitation who were undergoing surgery for left heart surgery.
To confirm the effectiveness and safety of the DragonFly-T transcatheter tricuspid valve repair system for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (TR grade ≥ 3+) who remained clinically symptomatic after guideline-directed medical treatment.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Dawneo Neoblazar® transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair system in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, objective performance criteria trial. 98 patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. This study will be conducted in in each site as run-in subjects. Subjects who meet the requirements and who voluntarily participate in the trial and sign the informed consent form, will be implanted with the Neoblazar® Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Edge-to Edge Repair System.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of Cardiovalve TR system
This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center trial to evaluate the LuX-Valve Plus system for treating symptomatic severe or greater TR in patients who are deemed high risk for tricuspid surgery. Treatment with the LuX-Valve Plus system may enable patients with tricuspid regurgitation to have a complete tricuspid valve replacement with a minimally invasive approach. A total of 93 subjects will be enrolled at up to 20 institutions worldwide. No single institution will be allowed to register more than 25% of total subjects. There is no minimum number of subjects to be registered at any site. Up to an additional 42 roll-in subjects, up to 3 per site, may be enrolled by operators without prior experience with the LuX-Valve Plus system to gain hands-on experience. The data of roll-in subjects will not count towards the overall enrollment cap. Safety and effectiveness results of roll-in subjects will be reported separately. All subjects will be evaluated at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years post-procedure