Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05883618 |
Other study ID # |
GNOSSpine |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 12, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
May 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2023 |
Source |
University of Cambridge |
Contact |
Saniya Mediratta |
Phone |
+441223336946 |
Email |
info[@]globalspinetrauma.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Primary aim:
Characterise case-mix, processes of care and variations in nonoperative and operative
management strategies, including emergency, ward, surgical and ICU care, in patients
presenting with traumatic spinal injury (TSI) between centres across low and high Human
Development Index (HDI) countries.
Primary outcome measure:
The primary outcome measure will be Frankel Grade at 6 weeks post-admission (or discharge,
whichever comes first).
Primary comparison:
Between country groups defined by human development index
Centre eligibility:
Any unit assessing patients with TSI worldwide will be eligible to participate
Patient eligibility:
All adult patients presenting with radiologically confirmed traumatic spinal injury.
Team:
Each participating unit will form a study team of up to four investigators including a study
lead, local investigator 1/2 and an independent data validator.
Time period:
Local study teams may select any 30-day period from July 12th 2021 to start their study.
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria between 00:01 on day 0 and 23:59 on day 30 of the
selected study period will be included.
Validation:
There will be a two-phase data validation process. Phase 1 will be prospective, validating
case ascertainment, and phase 2 will be retrospective, validating operative data.
Description:
Background Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) accounts for a significant proportion of disability
and death worldwide, with the majority of this burden affecting individuals in low- to
middle- income countries. Crucially, to date, the current disease profile of TSI has not been
characterised globally. In addition, the global approach to the care of patients following
TSI is inconsistent with considerable geographical differences in process of care reported,
and limited data available on the impact of these variations on outcomes following TSI. A
better understanding of case-mix and processes of care is urgently needed to underpin efforts
to identify ways of improving outcome relevant to different socioeconomic settings globally.
Objectives The primary objective of this study is to characterise the case-mix, processes of
care and variations in nonoperative and operative management strategies, including emergency,
ward, ICU care, in patients presenting with traumatic spinal injury (TSI) between centres
across low and high Human Development Index (HDI) countries. The secondary aims are to
summarise current local resources and management pathways for TSI through validation of
provider profiling data, describe differences in indications for nonoperative and operative
management, and short-term outcomes following TSI. This study aims to identify gaps in
processes of care to identify targets for future interventions to improve TSI care across
high and low-resource settings.
Methods A multi-centre, international, prospective, observational study. Any unit assessing
patients with TSI worldwide will be eligible to participate. Each participating unit will
form a study team responsible for gaining local approval, identifying patients for inclusion
and conducting data collection. Data will be collected via a secure online platform in an
anonymised form. Processes of care will be characterised by a detailed provider profiling
exercise. A registry describing the case-mix and care of all adults presenting with
radiologically confirmed TSI will be collected, in a given consecutive 30-day period during
the study period starting in 2021.
Results The dataset, developed through an iterative feedback process involving clinicians
from low and high Human Development Index (HDI) countries, includes patient demographics,
details of injury mechanism, local injury management and, if applicable, timing and nature of
surgery, post-operative care and immediate postoperative complications. Outcome measures
include Frankel grade at 6 weeks post-admission (or at discharge or death, whichever event
occurs first), early mortality, peri-operative complications, adverse events of special
interest, functional status and mobility. Descriptive analyses of case-mix and the variations
in processes of care will be conducted. Available resources, use of guidelines and variations
in processes of care will be characterised using both provider profiling responses and
patient-level data collected. Areas where known best practice is deficient or unavailable
will be identified as potential targets for future implementation studies.
Conclusions GNOS Spine aims to provide a global snapshot of the case-mix, management,
processes of care and short-term outcomes of patients presenting with TSI. In addition, the
study aims to identify areas for further study, and establish a platform and clinical network
to facilitate this future research in global neurotrauma and spinal surgery.