View clinical trials related to Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Filter by:In this prospective cohort study, the patients who were diagnosed with either uterine fibroid (control group) or adenomyosis (study group), were examined with transvaginal ultrasound and shear wave elastography. Definitive diagnosis was established by pelvic MRI. Shear wave elastography data of both groups were compared. Features of adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasound were also recorded for study group.
Retrospectively collect preoperative transvaginal B-mode ultrasound (BMUS), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) images and clinical data in patients with non-endometrial cancer diseases and endometrial cancer confirmed by pathology. They were grouped as training set(Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) and external validation set(Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University) . Radiomics features were extracted from corresponding transvaginal ultrasound images. Then, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to select the non- malignant or malignant status-related features and cervical stromal invasion (CSI) status or non-CSI status features and construct the transvaginal ultrasound radiomics score (Rad-score). Multivariate logistic regression was performed using the three radiomics score together with clinical data, and subsequently develop a nomogram to diagnosis endometrial cancer and CSI respectively. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness in the training and external validation set.
aims to determine the accuracy of measurement of the LUS thickness by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy in comparison to the actual thickness of LUS measured with manual caliper measurement during cesarean delivery. Study hypothesis: In women with previous cesarean delivery, determination of the LUS thickness can be done by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy and compared to the actual thickness of LUS measured with a manual caliper at cesarean delivery. Study question: considering transabdominal & transvaginal ultrasound, which of them would be more accurate in the assessment of LUS thickness?
In recent decades, the rate of cesarean section delivery has steadily increased worldwide ranging at 30% of deliveries, thus long-term risks after cesarean section need to be evaluated. Postoperative risks include, among others, uterine scar rupture and placental complications such as placenta previa and accreta- complications, which are possibly associated with uterine scar dehiscence. The prevalence of lower-segment uterine scar deficiency has previously been described as 63%. One recent systematic review and meta analysis investigated closure techniques of low transverse cesarean. No significant difference in risk of uterine scar defect comparing single layer versus double layer closure could be detected (RR 0.53), whereas in women with single layer closure, a lower residual myo-metrial thickness was observed (-2.6mm). However, the authors do conclude that data is insufficient to determine the risk of uterine rupture, dehiscence or gynecological outcomes due to insufficient power of available studies. A recently published Randomized Controlled Trial concluded that double-layer closure with unlocked first layer showed a better scar healing than locked single layer. The investigators main objective is to identify if single-layer suture of the uterus during cesarean section results in a higher rate of cesarean scar deficiency than double-layer suture. Interventions Single- layer versus double- layer uterine closure Two different techniques of uterine closure in cesarean section will be compared: single- layer versus double- layer continuous uterotomy suture. Standardized transvaginal sonography Transvaginal ultrasound examination is carried out by one expert sonographer. The ultrasound machine used for all examinations is GE Voluson E10. Primary outcome: CS scar deficiency visualized in transvaginal ultrasound at 3 months after CS (yes/no). Secondary outcome: Myometrial thickness at the site of uterine scar (mm).