View clinical trials related to Trachoma.
Filter by:Trachoma, an ocular infection caused by C. trachomatis, is the second leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Years of repeated infection with C. trachomatis cause the eyelid to scar and contract and ultimately to rotate inward such that the eyelashes rub against the eyeball and abrade the cornea (trichiasis). The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a multi-faceted strategy to combat trachoma which includes surgery to repair lids distorted by trachoma (trichiasis) in imminent danger of vision loss. Current evidence suggests that long-term success rates of trichiasis surgery are less than optimal due to variation in surgical technique. Previous research by this study team has demonstrated that shorter incisions have a higher rate of trichiasis recurrence. In addition, observations by this team's oculoplastic surgeon have led to the hypothesis that granuloma formation and lid contour abnormalities may result from current surgical practices. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of trichiasis surgeries performed with the newly developed trachomatous trichiasis (TT) clamp versus surgeries following standard technique (bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure or BTRP).
Trachoma, an ocular infection caused by C. trachomatis, is the second leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Years of repeated infection with C. trachomatis cause the eyelid to scar and contract and ultimately to rotate inward such that the eyelashes rub against the eyeball and abrade the cornea (trichiasis). The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a multi-faceted strategy to combat trachoma, which includes the use of antibiotic treatment to reduce the community pool of infection with C. trachomatis. The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized, community-based trial in three countries (Niger, Tanzania and The Gambia), representing different baseline endemicities, of alternative coverages and frequencies of administration of mass antibiotic treatment as well as to determine the cost-effectiveness of these different strategies from a program perspective.
Trachoma is a disease of poverty, which in the hyperendemic areas affects all individuals by the time they are two years old. Active disease is concentrated in children and occurs sporadically in adults. Infection is more widespread. It is anticipated that 25% of the children will be blinded by this disease if they live to be 60 years of age. The blindness rates are higher in women, presumably because of their closer contact with children who can infect them and add to damage from infections the women had while young. This proposal is to better define how azithromycin in community-based treatment can be used to eliminate blinding trachoma. We will also take the opportunity to join these field studies with genetic epidemiologic studies to better understand the dynamic epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a trachoma endemic area. The empiric data generated from the treatment/follow-up studies, together with the information on sources and spread patterns from genetic epidemiology will be used to generate more robust models to guide future treatment/re-treatment protocols. We propose to conduct a randomized, community based trial in the Maradi region of Niger to test the hypothesis that two community wide azithromycin treatments, spaced one month apart, are significantly more effective in reducing ocular C. trachomatis infection and trachoma at one year compared to a single mass azithromycin treatment.
Trachoma is the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Recurrent infection by Chlamydia trachomatis causes in-turning of the eyelids / lashes (trichiasis), leading to corneal damage and blindness. The WHO recommends corrective eyelid surgery for trichiasis. Unfortunately, trichiasis frequently returns following surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of surgery (at one and two years) for trichiasis using two currently used alternative suture types: non-absorbable (silk) and absorbable (vicryl). We, the researchers, hypothesise that the supportive presence of the absorbable suture for a longer period produces more stable wound healing, leading to a better outcome.
To assess in children the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of T1225 1.5% eye drops, in comparison to a reference product, single-dose oral azithromycin (AZM) 20 mg/kg, for the treatment of active trachoma. Evaluation of clinical efficacy was primary (% of clinical cure at Day 60 in Per Protocol Set), microbiological evaluation was secondary
There are no specific trials addressing the benefit of water provision and health education on prevalence of trachoma and infection with ocular Chlamydia trachomatis over time, despite considerable effort to provide water resources in trachoma endemic areas. Such information is sorely needed, to advance the Global Alliance agenda for the Elimination of Blinding Trachoma. This community-based clinical trial will randomize ten communities in Maradi Niger, half to receive delivery of water and health education services, and half for delivery of services at a later date. We hypothesize that the intervention communities will have lower rates of trachoma and C. trachomatis one and two years after delivery of services compared to communities without such services. This trial will provide, for the first time, solid evidence of the effect of such services on trachoma, as well as the added benefit following antibiotic provision by the Ministry of Health on sustaining reductions in trachoma and infection.
The purpose of this community-based randomized trial was to determine, in trachoma hyper-endemic communities of Tanzania, the added value of intensive spraying to control flies on the fly population and on trachoma and ocular chlamydia infection at 6 months and one year after mass antibiotic treatment.
After single, yearly, mass treatment of communities with azithromycin for active trachoma, what is the added effectiveness for reduction of trachoma and ocular C. trachomatis infection at one, two, and three years, relative to the added costs, of community-based surveillance and treatment of cases of severe trachoma (TI) semi-annually or every 4 months?
The WHO has initiated a program to eliminate trachoma, blinding eye infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, in large part by mass distributions of oral azithromycin. The proposed study will determine the frequency and treatment target of community-wide mass antibiotic treatment. We will also study the impact of mass antibiotic distribution on antibiotic-resistance in pneumococcus.
Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of azithromycin treatment. We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1.8 - 4%) of ocular chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families. In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum, this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem