The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success Rates

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Tourniquet Clinical Trial

Official title:
The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success Rates

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rates of two different tourniquets that are used when placing an IV.

n/a

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04239066` - Penile Ischemia for Hypospadias Repair and The Patients and Surgeons Reported Outcomes	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04277065` - Bulldog vs. Cotton Tourniquet in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Patients	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05926154` - Evaluation of Ischemia and Reperfusion Interval With Neuromonitorization in Tourniquet Application	N/A
Completed	`NCT04307290` - Dexmedetomidine on Tourniquet Induced -Systemic Effects	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03899116` - Gradual Deflation of Thigh Tourniquet for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Post-tourniquet Response in Old Patients
Terminated	`NCT04402775` - Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulae: Two Different Techniques of Bloodless Surgery and Their Effect on Fistula Stenosis.	N/A