A Study to Compare Different Ways of Steroid Administration After Total

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

We are going to evaluate the difference between perioperative intravenous steroid supplementation, perioperative periarticular steroid supplementation, and standard anaesthesia protocols. We'll evaluate the outcome of patients with knee osteoarthritis who are undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty to understand which of the three treatments give more benefits to the patient.

Clinical Trial Description

A total of 159 patients will be needed (53 patients per arm, 3 arms in total). Dexamethasone (brand name: Mephameson) is the steroid drug that we perioperative administer in two different ways: intra-venous (IV) dexamethasone (9mg) in arm-A, intra-articular (IA) dexamethasone (9mg) in arm-B. No steroid supplementation will be provided in the control group (arm-C). The primary objective of the study is to compare the effect on post-operative pain of I.V. and I.A. perioperative dexamethasone supplementation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary objectives of the studies will be the comparison between I.V. and I.A. peri-operative dexamethasone supplementation in terms of post-operative pain and function, opioids and analgesic drugs consumption, knee range of motion, systemic inflammatory response, time to mobilisation, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Moreover, both I.V. and I.A. steroid supplementation protocols will be compared to routine analgesia protocol (no steroid supplementation group) in order to document their advantages over the absence of steroid supplementation. The safety of I.V. and I.A. peri-operative dexamethasone will be evaluated and compared recording all the steroid supplementation related complications. In particular, the risk of hyperglycaemia-related complications and post-operative infections will be documented. The safety of both I.V. and I.A. steroid supplementation protocols will be verified comparing them to the no-treatment group in terms of incidence of complications. Overall study duration will be 12 years: 2 years to enroll all the patients and 10 years to complete the last follow-up. Primary data analysis is planned after the completion of the 1-year follow-up visits. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Total Knee Replacement

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04432012
Study type	Interventional
Source	Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona
Contact	Christian Candrian, MD, Prof
Phone	+41 (0) 91 811 61 23
Email	christian.candrian@eoc.ch
Status	Recruiting
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	July 1, 2020
Completion date	April 30, 2032

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Terminated	`NCT04040985` - Legion Primary Safety and Efficacy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05279092` - Yale Steroid Enhanced Versus Exparel Nerveblock TKA RCT Study	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03286543` - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04594447` - Physica System KR vs Physica System CR (K-20)	N/A
Completed	`NCT02413996` - Effects of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT01500252` - Patellar Resurfacing Versus Patellar Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty - A Randomized Clinical Trial	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04081493` - The Efficacy of Low-load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Before TKR	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03339557` - Comparison of Three Knee Replacements	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT04513145` - Adductor Canal Block	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT06045078` - Aromatherapy in Total Knee Replacement	N/A
Completed	`NCT02468934` - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Using the SPRINT System	N/A
Completed	`NCT02914210` - Virtual vs. Traditional Physical Therapy Following Total Knee Replacement	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT01523418` - Study to Observe Safety of Xarelto in VTE Prophlylaxis After Elective TKR (Total Knee Replacement) or THR (Total Hip Replacement)	N/A
Completed	`NCT00795223` - Comparative Pain Control Between 0.2 or 0.3 Spinal Morphine and 0.25 or 0.5 % Bupivacaine for FNB After TKA	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01307202` - Morphine Consumption in Joint Replacement Patients, With or Without Gabapentin Treatment	N/A
Completed	`NCT01515449` - Predictors of Poor Outcomes in 1038 Sigma Knees	N/A
Completed	`NCT01522781` - 10 Year Outcome of Total Knee Replacement (TKR) Using Sigma Prosthesis	N/A
Completed	`NCT04166539` - Neurotoxicity and Cardiotoxicity in Total Joint Arthroplasty
Completed	`NCT03454256` - Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patients With Total Knee Replacement	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT06118073` - Effect of Mindfulness on Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

A Study to Compare Different Ways of Steroid Administration After Total Knee Implantation

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms