Total Hip Arthroplasty Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicentric, Prospective Clinical Survey on Long Term Performance of an Acetabular Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Cementless fixation, with or without screw augmentation, has evolved during the past few decades as the preferred method for acetabular reconstruction. Although major improvements have been recorded with regard to clinical outcomes and survivorship, acetabular component loosening remains among the most common causes of failure and revision. Patient age, poor bone quality and conditions, such as osteonecrosis and dysplasia, have been observed to influence negatively long-term clinical results. Initial stability is fundamental for survivorship of cementless cups. Prerequisites to achieve durable cementless cup fixation are close contact with viable native bone, primary mechanical stability and secondary bone integration. Press-fit techniques provide optimal conditions for bone ingrowth and fixation but research focused on cup material in order to improve primary stability. Pore size, bone-implant apposition, and material properties all influence bone ingrowth and long-term stability. Biological ingrowth surfaces have become a standard prosthetic element in reconstructive hip surgery. A material's properties, three-dimensional architecture, and surface texture all play integral parts in its biological performance. Trabecular metal is an important new biomaterial that has been introduced to enhance the potential of biological ingrowth as well as provide a structural scaffold in cases of severe bone deficit. The continuity between the porous and solid parts has been specifically developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional porous coatings. In fact, the absence of an interface between the trabecular structure and the bulk material provides greater structural solidity and thus higher resistance to detachment and corrosion. Initial clinical applications have focused on bone restoration in tumor and salvage cases and in primary and revision reconstructive cases where the increased biological fixation would be of clinical benefit. However the bone ingrowth potential and mechanical integrity of this material offer exciting options for orthopedic reconstructive surgeons such as difficult THA cases, such as patients with high demands, subjects affected by severe hip conditions (i.e. osteonecrosis, dysplasia) or with extremely poor bone quality. Medacta Mpact 3D Metal cup, is an acetabular cup realized using the EBM (Electron Beam Melting) powder technology; this production method offers a high friction and scratch-fit feel for the initial stability, without the need of any additional coating. Moreover the 3D Metal structure creates a favorable environment for bone thus providing secondary fixation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long term clinical and radiological performance of MPact 3D Metal acetabular component.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 500 |
Est. completion date | December 7, 2032 |
Est. primary completion date | December 7, 2032 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Those suffering from hip primary arthrosis, post-traumatic arthrosis, hip dysplasia or avascular necrosis of femoral head, rheumatic arthrosis - Those aged between 18 and 75 years old at the surgery time - those suitable to undergo to a primary total hip arthroplasty for whom the Mpact 3D Metal cup will be implanted (according to the label indication/contraindications) - Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to patient's surgery Exclusion Criteria: - Those with acute or chronic infection - Those whose mental conditions may compromise their ability to provide informed consent to study participation, ability to complete questionnaires or complete 10-year follow-ups. - Those suffered by severe deformation, at the discretion of surgeon - Those suffered by osteoporosis - Those with metabolic disorders that may involve bone metabolism for which cementless implants are contraindicated - Those suffered by muscular atrophy or neuromuscular disease - Those allergic to medical device material previewed for the surgery - Those unable to give their consent to participate in the study or who do not want to participate - Those whose functional recovery is compromised by |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | IRRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi | Milan | MI |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medacta International SA |
Italy,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | long term performance | Device survival will be assessed by Kaplan Meier curve | 10 years | |
Secondary | Clinical performance | Harris Hip Score collected during preoperative and follow-up visits. Harris Hip score scale correspond to 0-100 points. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent. | 3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery | |
Secondary | Radiological performance | standard x-ray exam performed preoperatively and postoperatively before discharge from hospital and during follow-up visits | 3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery | |
Secondary | Hip physical function after surgery | HOOS-PS score collected during preoperative visit and follow-up visit. HOOS PS scale correspond to 100 (no difficulty) to 0 (extreme difficulty) scale. | 3 months and 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of complications | collection of adverse events | up to 10 years after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT02818894 -
Spinal Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02242201 -
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Lumbar Plexus Verses Periarticular
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02414542 -
Minima Clinical Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT01817010 -
Strength and Function Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01443975 -
Clinical Evaluation on the Use of the X-pander Device
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05530551 -
Effect of Single vs Multiple Prophylactic Antibiotic Doses on PJI Following Primary THA in Patients With OA
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05530174 -
Effect of Single vs Multiple Prophylactic Antibiotic Doses on PJI Following Primary THA in Patients With a Fracture
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05054192 -
Reliability and Validity of Modified Four Square Step Test
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06141928 -
Comparison of Three Different Surgical Approaches on the Functional Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04492462 -
The Impact of Two Different Physical Therapy Programs in the Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Anterior Approach Hip Replacement Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02926651 -
Single Versus Multi-Dose Oral Tranexamic Acid in Patients at High Risk for Blood Transfusion After Total Joint Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02308813 -
Predictability of the Ability to Perform an Emergency Stop With Disorders of the Hip
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02032017 -
Percutaneous Assisted Approach for Total Hip Replacement and it's Effect on Functional Rehabilitation.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01312077 -
The Analgesic Efficacy of Periarticular Infiltration of Local Anaesthetic for Total Hip Replacement
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01380665 -
Prevena™ Incision Management System Over Primarily Closed Hip and Knee Incisions in Patients Immediately Post Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05893563 -
Corail Stability at 5-Years Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06088069 -
Effect of Virtual Reality on Perioperative Anxiety, Stress and Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03210844 -
The Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Approach and Microposterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02006251 -
Real-Time Instrument for Acetabular Shell Positioning
|
||
Completed |
NCT01525667 -
Safety and Efficacy of IM Injections of PLX-PAD for the Regeneration of Injured Gluteal Musculature After Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |