View clinical trials related to Tooth, Impacted.
Filter by:In patients with high levels of fear and anxiety, it is recommended to perform dental procedures under sedation or general anesthesia depending on the nature of the procedure. In dental treatment under anesthesia, it is important that the procedure is comfortable and well tolerated by the patient. In addition, patient comfort is important in all dental procedures to prevent the development of avoidance behavior. During dental procedures performed under anesthesia, the oral cavity is completely within the scope of the surgical or procedure field. In this respect, sedation and general anesthesia in dental procedures and operations have specific risks and challenges.Since there is a risk of respiratory depression, hypoxia and hypercarbia during deep sedation, non-invasive ventilation support provided to patients with airway devices would be beneficial. In the research clinics where the study will be conducted, deep sedation with non-invasive mechanical ventilation support using a nasal CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) mask or nasal airway is applied during the extraction of impacted molars. Thus, many dental procedures are routinely performed under deep sedation without the need for general anesthesia. There are very limited data in the literature on the use of a nasal CPAP mask during sedation for different procedures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea or obesity. However, no study comparing ventilation support during deep sedation with nasal CPAP mask and nasal airway has been found in the literature. The aim of this study is to compare the non-invasive ventilation support provided with 2 different airway devices during the procedure in terms of intraoperative and postoperative related complications, ventilation parameters, patient and surgeon satisfaction. The hypothesis of the study is that two different ventilation support methods during deep sedation may be superior to each other in terms of anesthesia quality, postoperative complications related to airway devices, patient and surgeon satisfaction. In the study, a total of 60 patients (Group airway, n;30, Group Mask, n;30) from 2 centers are planned to be included in the study by performing power analysis with a statistical power of the trial >0.8. The permutation method will be applied within the scope of the restricted randomization method to determine the group of patients to be included.
Canine impaction is a sign of abnormal dental development with potentially far-reaching consequences (such as significant root resorption and loss of lateral incisors. This compromises both aesthetics and function of the teeth, making the prediction of canine tooth impaction increasingly important. Interceptive orthodontic measures, such as extraction of deciduous canines or molars or maxillary expansion aim to create extra space in the dental arch, allowing the canines to position themselves better and normalizing their eruption pattern. This study corresponds to the second phase of an RCT, based on the results of the first phase, published in July 2023 (S59030) (Willems G, Butaye C, Raes M, Zong C, Begnoni G, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Early prevention of maxillary canine impaction: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 31;45(4):359-369). The first phase compared the effect of 3 interceptive strategies (expansion, extraction and no intervention) on the position of impacted maxillary canines, finding that maxillary expansion provides the most improvement on impacted canine position. In second phase, 8-year-old patients without posterior crossbite and lack of space in the dental arch are randomized to treatment with 'slow maxillary expansion with removable plates' or 'no treatment'. These groups are additionally compared with patients with a crossbite and lack of space, which always receive expansion treatment. All selected patients will be followed up for at least 18 months. The primary endpoint is to investigate the effect of maxillary expansion with removable plates on the position of maxillary canines prone to impaction during early mixed dentition, assessed on panoramic X-rays. The secondary endpoint is the assessment of the need for additional orthodontic treatment.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the hypothesis that there are none difference in the treatment result of orthognathic surgery on the lower jaw, with interoperative wisdom tooth removal rather than preoperative wisdom tooth removal. In patients with severe dental malocclusion combined with a dentofacial deformity. The main question it aims to answer are: • Is there a difference in the degree of complication and the patient's perception, with inter-operative wisdom tooth removal rather than pre-operative wisdom tooth removal. Participants will be will be divided into two groups, with one group having their wisdom teeth removed 6 months before their jaw moving surgery and the other group having their wisdom teeth removed in connection with their jaw moving surgery.
The objective is to compare the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters of patients with an impacted third molar. Patients will be analyzed according to their skeletal characteristics: skeletal class (sagittal direction) and facial skeletal typology (vertical direction). The inclusion characteristics of third molars will also be analyzed, to see the links between typology and inclusion. The principal hypothesis is no significant difference in third molar inclusion patterns in relation to skeletal divergence.
Participants will be asked to use some medications after the tooth extraction procedure. These drugs can be used in different ways. Investigators plan to monitor the pain, swelling and duration of anesthesia in the body as a result of participants use.
This study was administered to 22 female and 8 male patients. Patients with impacted wisdom teeth on both sides of the mandible were selected. After impacted tooth extraction, the patient used mefenamic acid on one side and dexketoprofen on the other side for postoperative pain relief. The effects of these two materials on patient comfort were investigated.
The aim of this clinical study was to compare the effects of traditional and orthodontic extraction methods on postoperative nerve damage in impacted third molars associated with the inferior alveolar nerve. The main question it aims to answer is: -Does the orthodontic extraction method reduce the risk of nerve injury compared to traditional extraction? Participants will: - undergo either traditional or orthodontic extraction - be monitored for postoperative paresthesia. Researchers will compare traditional and orthodontic extraction methods to see if extraction methods affect postoperative nerve damage.
The aim of this study was investigate the comparison of postoperative effects of low laser treatment and platelet-rich fibrin application on mandibular impacted third molar tooth extraction. The study included a total of 60 patients with impacted mandibular third molar. Patients were evaluated in 4 randomly separated groups. In group 1, PRF was applied to the tooth socket. In group 2, PRF was applied to the tooth socket combined with Low Laser Treatment extraorally to the extraction area for three days within surgery day In group 3, Low Laser Treatment was applied to the extraorally to the extraction area for three days within surgery day. In group 4 (control group), tradional osteomy was made. The outcome variables were pain, swelling, the number of analgesics taken, and trismus. These variables were also assessed based on first, second, third, and seventh days following the operation. All of the 4 groups patients were prescribed an 875/125 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid tablet twice daily for five days.
The aim of this study is to compare piezosurgery and conventional surgery in impacted third molar surgery and to determine its effect on postoperative outcomes and quality of life.
The investigators aim to investigate if the additional information available from a 3D scan of the wisdom tooth can reduce the risk of nerve injury during wisdom tooth surgery compared to conventional 2D images. Wisdom tooth surgery is a common surgical procedures that a significant proportion of the population will undergo. As with any other surgical procedure, there are potential complications, of which, injury to the nerve supplying feeling to the lip, chin, and tongue is the most significant. This can lead to persistent pain, tingling, or numbness that may impact a patient's ability to eat and function. The risk of nerve injury during wisdom tooth surgery is assessed using X-ray images, which show the position of the nerve and tooth in the jawbone. 2D and 3D scans are used, which have their own advantages and disadvantages such as reduced cost and radiation dose with 2D or more information from 3D images, but it remains unclear which is better at reducing the risk of nerve injuries.