Clinical Trials Logo

Tooth Fracture clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Tooth Fracture.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06406582 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Teeth, Endodontically-Treated

Treatment Result of Zirconia Laminate Veneer

Start date: September 25, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of the zirconia laminate veneer, a minimally invasive prosthetic restoration

NCT ID: NCT06392685 Not yet recruiting - Hypersensitivity Clinical Trials

Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent

Start date: July 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Evaluation the influence of the use of silane coupling agent application as a separate step versus application of silane or acid resistance silane containing adhesives on the clinical performance of repaired posterior resin composite restorations according to Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria over one year.

NCT ID: NCT05816707 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Tooth Extraction Status Nos

The Assessment of Curcuma Longa Potentials for Soft and Hard Tissue Healing in Fresh

Start date: May 1, 2024
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The study will be conducted on 30 patients with split mouth design patients will be divided into curcumin and PRF groups patients will have bilateral tooth extraction one side will receive curcumin/PRF and the other side will be control soft tissue healing and bone quality will be evaluated post-operative

NCT ID: NCT05201664 Recruiting - Tooth Avulsion Clinical Trials

Surgical Extrusion: Volumetric and Insertion Analysis at 6 Months.

Start date: October 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim is to clinically evaluate the changes that occur in teeth that have undergone surgical extrusion treatment. Three parameters will be recorded before and 6 months after treatment: the position and the volume of the soft tissue, and the level of periodontal attachment.

NCT ID: NCT05127629 Recruiting - Tooth Decay Clinical Trials

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Wound Closure Methods in Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Implant-supported restorations have become one of the best treatment options for patients with tooth loss, with predictable long-term success rates and clinical outcomes. Immediate implant placement means the implant is placed immediately after tooth extraction. It can significantly reduce treatment time because extraction socket healing and implant osseointegration occur simultaneously. Immediate implant placement has many benefits, reducing the overall treatment time, reducing the patient's surgical procedures, and reducing surgical trauma (no flap reversal). However, the treatment also has significant limitations, including the inability to predict the possibility of bone and soft tissue healing, and the possibility of subsequent unfavorable esthetic outcomes. However, the evidence regarding soft and hard tissue and aesthetic outcomes in patients treated with immediate implants in the aesthetic area remains inconclusive. As the aesthetic success of implant restorations is increasingly valued over implant survival, there are significant clinical benefits to addressing immediate implant bone tissue resorption and soft tissue deficiencies and improving the aesthetic outcome of immediate implant restorations. To address the potential health and aesthetic problems associated with soft and hard tissue deficiencies around dental implants, bone grafting in the jumping gap and soft tissue grafting procedures are often performed. According to literature, autologous soft tissue grafts have shown the best clinical and histological results in soft tissue regeneration techniques. However, it requires removal of tissue from the patient's donor area, which can add additional trauma. In contrast, gelatin sponges, currently commonly used as wound closure materials, are only hemostatic and rapidly absorbed postoperatively, and do not provide protection of hard and soft tissue augmentation. Collagen matrix has recently been introduced for keratinized gingival augmentation and has shown encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies, but more information is needed to confirm its clinical efficacy. Mucograft® Seal is a porcine collagen matrix with a bilayer structure, a dense and slowly absorbing layer and a spongy layer that stabilizes blood clots and allows soft tissue cells to penetrate. Human gingival fibroblasts cultured on Mucograft® were demonstrated to have good proliferative properties and cell viability as scaffold material. In dog extraction sites, preliminary results suggest that the combination of Mucograft® and Bio-Oss Collagen may be an effective method for alveolar ridge preservation. Mucograft® Seal can be used in combination with Bio-Oss Collagen® for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction. The research hypothesis is that the use of a collagen matrix to seal the wound in immediate implant placement in aesthetic area will reduce buccal bone resorption and increase the width and thickness of the soft tissue at the implant site. Therefore, we designed this comparative clinical trial in which patients accept immediate implant placement in aesthetic area. The implant is placed after tooth extraction, and bone graft material Bio-Oss Collagen® is placed in the jump gap, and the wound was closed by different means (collagen matrix or gelatin sponge randomly). The clinical examination, CBCT imaging and histological evaluations were performed to compare the differences in clinical efficacy of the two wound closure methods. The primary outcome is the buccal bone thickness change at the immediate implant site 4 months after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04827693 Completed - Periodontitis Clinical Trials

The Cortical Shield for Facial Bone Reconstruction

Start date: January 3, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To evaluate a novel technique of bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement in severely damaged sockets.

NCT ID: NCT03145597 Recruiting - Tooth Fracture Clinical Trials

Survival Rate of Adhesively Luted Veneers

facings
Start date: June 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aims of this clinical study are: To evaluate the clinical performance between indirect composite and ceramic laminate veneers: Main interests are: - colour stability of the restoration (digital measurement in follow up) - failure mode of the restoration - wear of the restoration and antagonist Hypothesis: - The colour stability of indirect composite restorations will not be different from the ceramic restorations. - The indirect composite restorations will not be more prone to failure than the ceramic restorations. - Antagonist wear and restorative material wear will be similar for both ceramic and composite. Material and Methods The laminates will be fabricated according to a specified protocol. In order to avoid possible noticeable differences in case of distinct levels of possible discoloration, a modified split mouth design is employed where the central incisors and the symmetric other teeth receive the same type of restoration. Randomization is based on the paired teeth and it is performed using the flip of a coin for the choice of material. Evaluation will be performed at baseline and at follow-up visits annually up to 2 years.