Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04033692
Other study ID # MDRG2017-89MS-64SM
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2021
Est. completion date November 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date January 2022
Source Zimmer Biomet
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this retrospective consecutive series PMCF study is to collect data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the JuggerKnot Mini Soft Anchor (implant and instrumentation) when used for soft tissue to bone fixation in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery. Safety, performance, and clinical benefits will be evaluated at the following time points: pre op, 6 weeks, 3 months and 1-year follow-up. JuggerKnot Mini has been on the market since November of 2011.


Description:

The primary objective is to confirm safety of the study products. This will be assessed by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications, and adverse events. Relationship of the events to either implant or instrumentation should be specified. The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by analyzing recorded patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date November 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date October 1, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Implanted with one or more JuggerKnot Mini Soft Anchor(s) with either a 2-0 or 3-0 suture - Must have undergone repair, repositioning or reattachment of soft tissues, ligament and tendons to the mandible is required for surgical stabilization of the TMJ articular disc Exclusion Criteria: - Local Infection. - Patient conditions including blood supply limitations and insufficient quantity or quality off bone or soft tissue. - Patients with mental or neurological conditions who are unwilling or incapable of following postoperative care instructions or patients who are otherwise unwilling or incapable of doing so. - Foreign body sensitivity where material sensitivity is suspected. - Off-label use. - Sepsis. - Patient is a prisoner. - Patient is a known alcohol or drug abuser.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
JuggerKnot Mini Soft Anchor
Patient who have been implanted with one or more JuggerKnot Mini Soft Anchor(s) who have undergone repair, repositioning or reattachment of soft tissues, ligament and tendons to the mandible is require for surgical stabilization of the TMJ articular disc.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Zimmer Biomet

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Device Safety Assessed Through the Incidence and Frequency of Revisions, Complications, and Adverse Events Assessment of safety by recording and analyzing the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications, and adverse events. Out to a minimum of 1 year
Secondary Device performance and Clinical Benefits Assessed by a Pain Assessment. and Temporomandibular Joint Function of the Pain Assessment Survey Case Report Form. Pain Assessment is used to evaluate a patients pain from 0 to 10, 0 representing no pain at all and 10 representing the worse pain imaginable. Out to a minimum of 1 year
Secondary Device performance and Clinical Benefits Assessed by a TMJ Function Pain Assessment Survey Case Report Form The TMJ Function portion of the Pain Assessment Survey is assessed by if the patient experiences Temporomandibular Joint Clicking or Popping Noise. The Joint Clicking or Popping noise is evaluated as a Yes the joint click when opening and closing the mouth, or No the joint does not click when opening and closing the mouth on either the left or right side. Out to a minimum of 1 year
Secondary Device performance and Clinical Benefits Assessed by a Headache Pain Assessment Survey Case Report Form The Headache portion of the Pain Assessment Survey is evaluated as, Yes the patient has headaches, or No the patient does not have headaches. If they check yes the survey asks on which side of the headache occurs and in which location. Location options are: Front, Posterior, Temporal or Top of the head. Out to a minimum of 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05510336 - Assessment of Concentric Needle Technique in Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Internal Derangement. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02960048 - Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint (Michigan-type Occlusal Splint) Versus Anterior Repositioning Splint . N/A
Recruiting NCT05627830 - Ultrasound Guided Versus Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. N/A
Recruiting NCT03737305 - RCT of a Temporomandibular Joint Distraction Device for Patients With Articular Disorders Diagnosis N/A
Completed NCT05548894 - Comparison Between Splint and Laser in Patients Without Disc Displacement With Reduction N/A
Completed NCT05481268 - Kinesiotaping and Stretching on SKM and Upper Trapezius Muscle in TMD Patients N/A
Completed NCT06013059 - A Comparative Study Between the Different Levels of TMJ Arthroscopy in the Management of TMJ Internal Derangement N/A
Completed NCT04942743 - Clinical & MRI Finding of TMJ Disk Perforation
Not yet recruiting NCT06207955 - I-PRF After Arthrocentesis Plus Botox Injection to Lateral Pterygoid Muscle in Treatment of Anterior Disc Displacement N/A
Completed NCT04951895 - Clinical and MRI Finding of The Temporomandibular Joint Posterior Disk Displacement
Completed NCT04951830 - Clinical and MRI Finding of The Temporomandibular Joint Stuck Disk
Not yet recruiting NCT02992379 - Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint Versus Pivot Splint as Jaw Exercise Together With Stabilizing Splint N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03000790 - Evaluation Lingual Ring Splint N/A
Recruiting NCT05983653 - Evaluation of Arthrocentesis With and Without PRP Injection in Patients With Disc Displacement With Reduction. N/A