Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry

Tibial Fractures Clinical Trial

Official title:

Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry (RFN-Advanced™ Retrograde Femoral Nailing System/ TN-Advanced™ Tibial Nailing System)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05272631
• Other study ID #: DST202103
• Secondary ID: DST202103
• Status: Recruiting
• Start date: May 4, 2022
• Est. completion date: December 20, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: June 2024
• Source: DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
• Contact: Study Contact
• Phone: 484 356-9532
• Email: DST202103[@]its.jnj.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this post-market registry is to monitor the clinical safety and performance (union rates and time to union) of two DePuy Synthes lower extremity shaft nails: RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (RFNA) and TN-Advanced Tibial Nailing System (TNA) in participants who have experienced femoral or tibial fractures, respectively, requiring fixation and stabilization or who require a revision due to a malunion or a nonunion.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 250
• Est. completion date: December 20, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 15, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 12 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Skeletally mature adults age greater than or equal to (>=) 22 years (Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced [RFNA], Tibial Nail Advanced [TNA]) and adolescents 12-21 years of age in which the growth plates have fused (TNA only)

• Participant receives an RFNA and/or TNA based on a diagnosis of open or closed, unilateral or bilateral femoral shaft or distal femur fracture (RFNA); unilateral or bilateral tibial fracture (TNA); revision of malunion or nonunion of previous fracture, or impending pathologic fracture (RFNA only) that will be treated operatively as part of standard of care. In addition, the following will be included: a) RFNA only: femoral shaft or distal femur fracture can be periprosthetic (PPFx) fracture after total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, or total or hemi hip arthroplasty requiring nail osteosynthesis

• Participant (legally authorized representative if participant is a minor) voluntarily signs the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/ Ethics committee (EC) approved consent form

• Participant must be able to read and understand questions and responses in an available translated language for patient reported outcomes (PROs)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month. Participation in observational studies is allowed

• In the opinion of the Principal Investigator, participant is unable to comply with the requirements of the Registry

• Participant has known allergies to implant components

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Femoral Fractures
• Fractures, Bone
• Tibial Fractures

Intervention

Device:
• Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced
No drug will be given as part of this study. Participant will undergo surgery with RFNA based on the surgeon's decision and the site's SOC.
• Tibial Nail Advanced
No drug will be given as part of this study. Participant will undergo surgery with TNA based on the surgeon's decision and the site's SOC.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Michigan Medicine; University of Michigan	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	University of Missouri	Columbia	Missouri
United States	Duke University	Durham	North Carolina
United States	JPS Health Network	Fort Worth	Texas
United States	Orthopedic Research Foundation, Inc	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	Vanderbilt University Medical Center	Nashville	Tennessee
United States	Oregon Health and Science University	Portland	Oregon
United States	Wake Forest Baptist Health	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (15)

Beak P, Moudhgalya S, Anderson T, Hing CB. Painful locking screws with tibial nailing, an underestimated complication. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Dec;29(8):1795-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02501-8. Epub 2019 Jul 16. — View Citation

Byun SE, Shon HC, Park JH, Oh HK, Cho YH, Kim JW, Sim JA. Incidence and risk factors of knee injuries associated with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures: A multicentre retrospective analysis of 429 femoral shaft injuries. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1602-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 4. — View Citation

Capone A, Congia S, Civinini R, Marongiu G. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 May-Aug;14(2):189-196. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.189. Epub 2017 Oct 25. — View Citation

Cereijo C, Attum B, Rodriguez-Buitrago A, Jahangir AA, Obremskey W. Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fractures: Suprapatellar Approach. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018 Sep 12;8(3):e24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00063. eCollection 2018 Sep 28. — View Citation

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30. — View Citation

Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of fractures and dislocations. In: Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Mcqueen MM, et al, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015:59-108

EQ-5D-5L User Guide, EuroQol Research Foundation 2019; Version 3.0 Updated Sept. 2019

Finkemeier, C et al. (2020a, August 30). RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System. https://approvedsolutions.aofoundation.org/approvedsolutionsfolder/2020/rfn-advancedretrograde- femoral-nailing-system#tab=details TN- Advanced Tibial Nailing System https://approvedsolutions.aofoundation.org/approvedsolutionsfolder/2020/t -advanced-tibialnailing- system#tab=details;

Finkemeier, C et al. (2020b, November 24) Advanced Nailing System. AO Innovations Magazine 2020. https://issuu.com/aofoundation/docs/aoe_tc_innovations_24_11_2020_final

He GC, Wang HS, Wang QF, Chen ZH, Cai XH. Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: a meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(4):234-40. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(04)03. — View Citation

Lee C, Zoller SD, Perdue PW Jr, Nascone JW. Pearls and Pitfalls With Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Tibia Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15;28(2):66-73. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00765. — View Citation

Meena RC, Meena UK, Gupta GL, Gahlot N, Gaba S. Intramedullary nailing versus proximal plating in the management of closed extra-articular proximal tibial fracture: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Sep;16(3):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0332-9. Epub 2015 Jan 15. — View Citation

Oak SR, Strnad GJ, Bena J, Farrow LD, Parker RD, Jones MH, Spindler KP. Responsiveness Comparison of the EQ-5D, PROMIS Global Health, and VR-12 Questionnaires in Knee Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 17;4(12):2325967116674714. doi: 10.1177/2325967116674714. eCollection 2016 Dec. — View Citation

Rodriguez EK, Boulton C, Weaver MJ, Herder LM, Morgan JH, Chacko AT, Appleton PT, Zurakowski D, Vrahas MS. Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures. Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Nov 4. — View Citation

Yoon BH, Park IK, Kim Y, Oh HK, Choo SK, Sung YB. Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb;141(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x. Epub 2020 May 9. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Time to Union	Time to union will be reported. Union is defined as a combination of radiographic and clinical assessment, where union will be considered achieved based on radiographic images, and no pain at the fracture site indicative of nonunion.	Up to Week 56
Primary	Number of Participants with Union (Healing)	Number of participants with union (healing) will be reported. Union is defined as a combination of radiographic and clinical assessment, where union will be considered achieved based on radiographic images, and no pain at the fracture site indicative of nonunion.	Up to Week 56
Secondary	Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score	The VAS is a 100 point one-dimensional line anchored on either end by verbal descriptors ranging from " 0=no pain" to "100=worst pain you can imagine". The higher score indicates greater pain intensity.	From Week 6 up to Week 52
Secondary	Short Form 12-Item Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire Score	The SF-12 volume-2 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). For each of the 8 domains, the questions are coded, added and transformed on a scale that ranges from 0 (the worst health status for that dimension) to 100 (the best health status).	From Week 6 up to Week 52
Secondary	Quality of Life as Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Score: EQ-5D Descriptive System	EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that was designed for self-completion. EQ-5D-5L consist of EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The scores are applied to population-specific valuations of health states to result in a single index value. The health index scores generally range from less than 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating higher health utility.	From Week 6 up to Week 52
Secondary	Quality of Life as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Score: EQ VAS	EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that was designed for self-completion. EQ-5D-5L consist of EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicate 'The best health you can imagine' and 100 indicate 'The worst health you can imagine'.	From Week 6 up to Week 52
Secondary	Weight Bearing Status	Weight bearing status will be categorized as weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT), limited weight-bearing up to half of the body weight, and no weight bearing.	From Week 2 up to Week 52
Secondary	Mobility Assessment	Mobility assessment including ambulatory/unaided, ambulatory with cane, ambulatory with walker and nonambulatory will be reported.	Up to Week 56
Secondary	Number of Participants with Revision Surgery	Number of participants with revision surgery will be reported. It includes the surgery following the index surgery that involves adjustment, modification, removal or replacement of the implanted device or other associated devices used to treat the fracture (nail, screws, endcaps, locking attachment washer [LAW] [Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced {RFNA} only] or condylar nut and nut and screw washers [RFNA only]).	From Week 2 up to Week 52
Secondary	Number of Participants with Reoperation	Number of participants with reoperation will be reported. It is defined as a second operation at the fracture site(s) after the index surgery that does not include adjustment, modification, removal or replacement of the implanted device.	From Week 2 up to Week 52