Botulinum Toxin Versus Active Strength Training in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

Tennis Elbow Clinical Trial

— BooST  

Official title:

Botulinum Toxin Versus Active Strength Training in Treatment of the Lateral Epicondylitis - A Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00930709
• Other study ID #: EVO1122
• Secondary ID: 2009-009837-14
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: June 29, 2009
• Last updated: December 30, 2014
• Start date: March 2009
• Est. completion date: December 2014

Study information

• Verified date: December 2014
• Source: Seinajoki Central Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Finland: Finnish Medicines Agency
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy, feasibility and cost effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A injections to active nine weeks strength training and stretching program in the treatment of the chronic lateral epicondylitis.

The main hypothesis is that the botulinum toxin type A injections may enable more rapid pain relief while strength training may provide better functional results and less relapses during the follow-up.

Description:

INTRODUCTION:

Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is a frequent repetitive stress injury, affecting the common extensor muscles at the lateral humeral epicondyle. Lateral epicondylitis has a well-known spontaneous healing tendency. Still the prevalence of the chronic lateral epicondylitis is 1.4% in working populations causing significant occupational disability and financial burden.

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of different treatment modalities for lateral epicondylitis present conflicting results. There are no consistent guidelines for management of the prolonged lateral epicondylitis. Progressive strengthening and stretching exercises as well as botulinum toxin type A injections have been suggested to be effective in treatment of chronic cases. However, there are only a few studies comparing different treatment modalities and botulinum toxin treatment have not been included in any of these.

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy, feasibility and cost effectiveness of the botulinum toxin type A injections to active nine weeks strength training and stretching program in the treatment of the chronic lateral epicondylitis.

The main hypothesis is that the botulinum toxin type A injections may enable more rapid pain relief while strength training may provide better functional results and less relapses during the follow-up.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

A sample size of 120 participants with an equal drop-out rate of 15 % per group was determined in advance to detect a clinically significant 30 percentage points difference in outcome measures between the treatment groups with the minimum success rate of 65 % at the statistical significance level of 0.05 and power of 80 %.

During the recruitment process all patient newly referred to Department of PM&R outpatient clinics in the Seinäjoki Central Hospital due to elbow pain are evaluated by the study investigators. Every eligible patient with written informed consent is recruited. A computerised random number generator is used to draw up an allocation schedule. Patients are allocated in treatment groups via opaque sealed envelopes marked according to the random schedule.

Measurements and training instructions are performed by five trained physical therapists. In addition to detailed personal training instructions given by physical therapist, illustrated instructions as well as instruction video will be provided for patients in the training group. Physical therapists instructing patients do not perform any measurements to enable blinding of assessor. Measurement devices are calibrated regularly according to the manufacturers' recommendations and quality assurance measurements with test weights are performed on regular basis.

The principal statistical analysis will be done on an intention-to-treat basis. Repeated measures of ANCOVA and Cox Proportional Hazard Regression are planned to be used as primary methods. If there will be relapses, more advanced longitudinal models such as Generalised Estimating Equations and Random Coefficient Analysis will be used.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 103
• Est. completion date: December 2014
• Est. primary completion date: December 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 20 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• pain at the lateral side of the elbow over 3 months

• local tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle

• positive Mill's sign

• lateral elbow pain progression on resisted wrist and/or middle finger extension

• involved in working life

Exclusion Criteria:

• bilateral symptoms or simultaneous medial epicondylitis

• verified or suspected cervical radiculopathy or affected limb neuropathy

• congenital or acquired deformities of the elbow

• previous surgery of the elbow

• infection, dislocation, tendon ruptures, or fractures in the area

• systemic musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, incl. rheumatic diseases and fibromyalgia

• allergy, antibodies or other contraindications for botulinum toxin

• severe depression, chronic pain syndrome or somatisation disorder

• ongoing retirement process

• pregnancy or breastfeeding

• current participation in other clinical trials

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Epicondylitis, Lateral Humeral
• Tennis Elbow

Intervention

Drug:
• Botulinum toxin type A (Botox®, Allergan)
Two injections of 10-60 units of botulinum toxin type A. Injections are administered with ENMG assisted technique at the baseline and after 13 weeks.

Behavioral:
• Active strength training and stretching
Training duration 9 weeks, intensified every 3 weeks in supervision of physiotherapist. Training program includes progressive, slow, repetitive wrist and forearm stretching, eccentric muscle strengthening, occupational exercises and upper limb neural mobilization training.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Finland	Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital	Seinäjoki

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Seinajoki Central Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Finland, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Pain, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Primary	Grip strength (pain free and maximal), hydraulic hand dynamometer, change from baseline		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Experienced disability, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Isometric wrist extension and flexion strength, digital hanging scale with rigid bench frame, change from baseline		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Treatment adverse effects		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	Yes
Secondary	Economic evaluation of interventions, direct and indirect costs		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Days in sick leave		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Experienced forearm pain and disability, The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	General improvement, 7-point Likert scale		0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks	No

External Links

•   Seinäjoki Central Hospital homepage