Tendon Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Usefulness of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course in an Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training Program
Verified date | December 2019 |
Source | Université de Sherbrooke |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A group of orthopedic surgery residents underwent a structured online and practical musculoskeletal ultrasound course. Their proficiency on a written and practical exam, as well as frequency and comfort when using was recorded prior to the course, immediately after, and 6 months after the course.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | July 6, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 6, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Be an orthopedic surgery resident - Training at the University of Manitoba - Post-graduate year (PGY) one to five Exclusion Criteria: - Residents having less than six months of training left before graduation - Residents on extended leave (for example: completing graduate studies abroad, parental leave, and sabbatical) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | University of Manitoba | Winnipeg | Manitoba |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Université de Sherbrooke |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Socio-demographic questionnaire | This questionnaire was presented to participants once at the moment of their inclusion in the study. It covered the residents' level of training (post-graduate year), age, sex, the amount of prior exposure to ultrasound (in approximate hours), and the different settings in which the residents have been exposed to MSK-US. | Before the course (within a month) | |
Primary | Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge after the course | A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score. | Before the course (within a month), immediately after the course (same day) | |
Primary | Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge at 6 months | A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score. | Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course | |
Secondary | Practical shoulder ultrasound exam | Each participant underwent a practical examination assessing ultrasound proficiency at each endpoint. The residents were assessed by one of the author of the study on their ability to perform a shoulder ultrasound exam as well as the different tasks related to the MSK-US. For each task, the assessor rated the participant on a scale of 0 to 2, where : 0 means an inability to perform the task, 1 means the task is only partially completed, 2 means that the task that is performed correctly. The final score was then be calculated and reported in percentage (with 100 being a perfect score) for the analysis. |
Immediately after the course (same day), 6 months after the course | |
Secondary | Ultrasound comfort in clinical setting | A questionnaire covering different aspect of ultrasound use by the residents was given using the online platform at each endpoint. The questionnaire inquired about the comfort level when using MSK-US for different examinations and procedure (Numeric Analog Scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being very uncomfortable and 10 being very comfortable). Each numeric analog scale was reported independently and not compound score was created: Setting up the ultrasound machine Choosing the appropriate probe Adjusting the depth and contrast Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury Performing a joint injection or aspiration Performing an injection or aspiration in any other region than a joint Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the forearm Guiding the reduction of any other fracture than the forearm Performing ultrasound in general |
Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course | |
Secondary | Ultrasound use in clinical setting | The questionnaire inquired about the number of time ultrasound was used in the last 6 months for different examinations and procedures. This was reported as an absolute number for each aspect of ultrasound use: Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury Performing a joint injection or aspiration Performing an injection or aspiration of any other region than a joint Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the adult patient Guiding the reduction of a pediatric fracture |
Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT05486078 -
Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Use MD Tissue Collagen Medical Device in the Infiltrative Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS)
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05323643 -
Role of US in Evaluation of Tendon and Ligament Abnormalities in Hand and Fingers
|