View clinical trials related to Tendinopathy.
Filter by:As off-the-counter foot orthoses are readily available and have an economic advantage, they are increasingly being used by healthcare professionals to treat mechanical foot pains in place of custom foot orthosis. However, there is a lack of available evidence to determine if a plain off-the-counter foot orthosis that aims to contours to the foot or a specifically optimized off-the-counter foot orthosis utilizing the type of orthotic design proposed by Abbasian and Pomeroy is more effective in the management of mechanical foot pains in the Subtle Cavus foot type. This study proposal seeks to fill the gap in this area. Primary Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of specifically optimized off-the-counter foot orthosis designed for the Subtle Cavus foot type in improving patient reported outcomes in patients with mechanical foot pains when compared to plain off-the-counter foot orthosis. Primary Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in pain and functional scores reported by patients between specifically optimized off-the-counter foot orthosis and plain off-the-counter foot orthosis in patients with mechanical foot pains at four, eight and twelve weeks of intervention. In our study, the Subtle Cavus foot refers to the flexible idiopathic forefoot-driven Pes Cavus that can be clinically recognised with a positive "Peek a Boo" sign, inverted hindfoot position in weight bearing stance and Positive Coleman Block Test as reported by Manoli and Graham in 2005. Also, for our study, mechanical foot pains are limited to clinically diagnosed Plantar Fasciitis, Achilles Tendinopathy, Peroneal Strain or Metatarsalgia: Plantar Fasciitis is clinically diagnosed using the following history and physical examination findings: - Plantar medial heel pain /or pain along the plantar fascia: most noticeable with initial steps after a period of inactivity but also worse following prolonged weight bearing - Heel pain /or pain along the plantar fascia precipitated by a recent increase in weightbearing activity - Pain with palpation of the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia /or along the band of plantar fascia structure Achilles Tendinopathy is clinically diagnosed using the following history and physical examination findings: Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy: - Self-reported localized pain and perceived stiffness in the Achilles tendon following a period of inactivity (eg, sleep, prolonged sitting) lessen with an acute bout of activity and may increase after the activity. - Symptoms are frequently accompanied by Achilles tendon tenderness. - Pain located 2 to 6 cm proximal to the Achilles tendon insertion that began gradually and pain with palpation of the midportion of the tendon to diagnose midportion Achilles tendinopathy Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: - Self-reported pain that is aggravated by activity and stiffness that is associated with prolonged periods of rest. - Pain and tenderness with palpation within the distal 2 cm of the Achilles tendon. - Redness and swelling over area of Achilles Tendon insertion over posterior heel Peroneal Strain is clinically diagnosed using the following history and physical examination findings: - Pain and swelling posterior to the lateral malleolus - Pain with active eversion and dorsiflexion against resistance - May have a history of chronic lateral ankle pain and instability - Pain and tenderness with palpation along the course of the peroneal tendons Metatarsalgia is clinically diagnosed using the following history and physical examination findings: - Self-reported pain during the propulsive phase of gait. The pain is localized underneath the prominent metatarsal heads - The plantar soft tissue can be swollen and inflamed. - Presence of hyperkeratosis over tender areas may be present - Pain and tenderness with palpation of plantar metatarsophalangeal joints Secondary Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of specifically optimized off-the-counter foot orthosis designed for the Subtle Cavus foot type in improving patient reported outcomes in patients with mechanical foot pains pre- and post-intervention. Secondary Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in pain and functional scores reported by patients after introduction of specifically optimized off-the counter foot orthosis pre- and post-intervention at initial to four, initial to eight and initial to twelve weeks of intervention.
Background: Groin pain associated with adductor tendinopathy is the second cause of muscle pathology in a football player (20%), so a good treatment taking into account both internal and external factors that may influence the pathology of our patient, would be the key to an improvement in the symptoms he may have. Material and methods: Firstly, the pain threshold is measured by performing the Copenhagen compression test, and in a palpation at the proximal level of the adductors, the hip joint range (ROM) is measured and the HAGOS questionnaire is passed. Then, a sample of 20 participants (N = 20) is selected and randomly divided into two groups, a control group of 10 participants (n = 10), with a treatment based on electrotherapy combined with an exercise programme; and an experimental group of 10 participants (n = 10) with a treatment based on manual therapy combined with an exercise programme. Finally, they performed all measurements.
The purpose of the current investigation is to examine the effect of tissue-flossing on upper extremity, pain, strength and functional performance in subjects with musculoskeletal-related complaints of pain surrounding the elbow complex
A phase IV, randomized, single-blind, single-center study measuring the effects of Pecs II block with 0.25% bupivacaine versus surgeon infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine on postoperative pain control and opioid utilization in participants who undergo open subpectoral tenodesis.
It was conducted a prospective study with a series of 50 patients treated with PRP one-shot injection in patient affected by Supraspinatus Tendinosis. One independent observer performed clinical and functional evaluations at T0 (recruitment), T1 (one month after the injection), T2 (three months after the last injection) and T3 (six months after the last injection). Constant Score, The Disabilites of the Arm,Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) And Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were administered at each evaluation.
Invesigators plan to conduct a 12-week longitudinal cohort study of 30 subjects with calcaneal apophysitis. Subjects will be included if they are between 7-17 years-old, have experienced an insidious onset of heel pain with running or jumping activities, and have no underlying diagnosis predisposing heel pain and no other injury that limits their ability to run and jump. Parents of subjects will be invited to participate by completing questionnaires related to their perspective of their child's symptoms, physical activity level, quality of life, and their satisfaction with the treatment protocol. Subjects will be asked to attend 4 monthly sessions consisting of evaluation and treatment.
Trial Design: The Norwegian Tennis Elbow (NOTE) study is a single-centre; three-armed, feasibility randomised controlled trial. Aim: The primary aim of this study is to pilot the methods proposed to conduct a definite RCT study. Objectives: - Measure the process of recruitment. - Measure intervention adherence and acceptability. - Measure outcome measure retention rate and completeness. The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) will be used as the primary outcome measure. Intervention: Patients will be randomised to either: 1) Heavy slow resistance training (HSR), 2) Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) or 3) Information and advice. Follow-up will be after 3 and 6 months.
To evaluate the outcome of percutaneous paratenon release for chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy.
This study is designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which we monitor the effects of low-energy focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT). Participants will be randomly divided into two groups. ESWT according to selected parameters will be applied to Group A. Group B will receive sham ESWT. Patients in both groups will have the same program. The research for one patient lasts a total of 8 weeks (2 months) from the initial to the final examination. In the first week, there will be a clinical examination by a physiotherapist, an ultrasonographic examination, and the patient will complete a VISA-A questionnaire. At the end of the examination, the patient will be randomly assigned to group A or B and receive the first application. For the next 4 weeks, additional applications will be performed once a week. The interval between individual applications should be at least 7 days. Thus, a total of 5 applications of ESWT or sham ESWT will be performed. The final examination will take place 3 weeks after the last application and will include the same procedures as for the initial examination.
The incision is very useful and easy for the direct lateral shoulder joint exposure.