Temporal Cephalic Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Floral Remedies for Sleep Bruxism Patients: A Randomized Trial for Attenuating Temporal Cephalic Pain
Verified date | April 2017 |
Source | Universidade Federal Fluminense |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Introduction: Bruxism is a parafunctional habit that affects the stomatognathic system and its support structures. Usually associated with stress and mostly occurring at night, bruxism leads to sleep disorders and daily tension headaches. Aiming to rebalance the emotional and physical state of patients, floral-essence therapy lacks side effects or drug interactions, and has been recognized by the World Health Organization. Aim and Methods: The investigators created a buccal-relaxant formula, combining 8 floral essences and testing it in a double-blind clinical assay conducted in bruxism patients. Results: An alcohol solution of the buccal relaxant containing Daughter of Gaia floral essences of Taraxacum officinale, Antirrhinum majus, Fuchsia × hybrida, Bidens bipinnata, Campanula carpatica, Achyrocline, Nymphaea caerulea, and Tetraoensis riparia significantly attenuated temporal headaches in the bruxism patients compared to the placebo group (69.46%±1.79 versus 3.55%±1.37, P=0.0001). Moreover, patients after 21 days using the buccal relaxant increased their quality of sleep and experienced attenuated jaw-muscle rigidity or morning mouth-opening difficulties. Less masseter hypertrophy and reduced sensitivity due to abfraction of enamel facets were noted as well. Conclusions: The buccal-relaxant formula may have sedative properties, preventing daily temporal headaches in sleep-bruxism patients, suggesting a muscle-relaxation effect. Although the results are promising, long-term studies are needed to clarify the pharmacological mechanism of each floral essence in the buccal-relaxant formula and their tolerance effects.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 74 |
Est. completion date | June 20, 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | June 11, 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 21 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Shear noise and/or tooth-grinding, confirmed by a room companion or family member. Observation of wear facets on the tooth surfaces, incompatible with age and function. Presence of two or more symptoms, such as headache in the temporal region, rigid jaw muscles or fatigue at night or upon awakening, locking or difficulty in opening the mouth in the morning, dental hypersensitivity, hypertrophy of the masseter muscles. Exclusion Criteria: Currently in treatment for bruxism, through the use of an interocclusal stabilization splint. Patients with alcoholism. Patients who make use of medications that affect episodes of bruxism, such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, amphetamines, and inhibitors of serotonin reuptake. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Fluminese Federal University | Niteroi | RJ |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | temporal cephalic pain evaluation | Pain Pain was evaluated twice, in the beginning and after 21 days of the treatment. Pain was scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS) described by Huskisson6 (1974) and modified by Finkel12. All results were recorded in each patient's folder, under restricted access. Patients, holding the VAS, were asked to point to the face/score number that indicated the level of his or her pain. Pain level was measured as follows: No pain or the absence of any discomfort, scored as 0 (zero); mild pain, scored from 1 to 3; moderate pain, scored as 4, 5, 6 or 7; and severe pain, scored as 8, 9 or 10. |
21 days | |
Secondary | Sleep-quality assessment | A question regarding sleep quality of the patients was answered after 21 days of the buccal-relaxant and placebo treatments. The question was: Did your sleep-quality improved? The answers were: Yes or No. All results were recorded in each patient's folder, under restricted access. | 21 days |