View clinical trials related to Telemedicine.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the telemedicine practices for contraceptive counseling given to pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does family planning counseling given to pregnant women by using telemedicine practices have an effect on the knowledge level about family planning? - Is family planning counseling given to pregnant women by using telemedicine practices effective on satisfaction with family planning services? Participants have attended to contraceptive counseling video call sessions provided via WhatsApp application and they have the opportunity to see the consultant and her materials during these sessions. After these sessions (two weeks later), contraceptive counseling video call session has been repeated, and at the end of this second session, women have been asked to answer the questions in the "Family Planning Knowledge Level Form" and the "Family Planning Services Satisfaction Scale". There is a comparison group (a control group) in this study, and no intervention was made to the women in the control group other than the routine services given in primary care settings. Researchers will compare the experimental group with control group to see if the telemedicine practices are effective in increasing the knowledge level of pregnant women about family planning and in the satisfaction of family planning services provided by primary health care settings.
To determine whether telemedicine is an acceptable addition to pre-operative counseling, compared to face-to-face communication alone for patients with endometrial cancer.
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a growing health risk for the society. An easy-access and low-cost intervention for the whole family will be developed to help families with (at risk of) type 2 diabetes maintain diabetes-frendly everyday life. The intervention will be tested for feasibility. Methods: Following the framework for developing and conduct of complex interventions, the intervention will be developed on the basis of current evidence on family-based diabetes treatment and opinions of families with type 2 diabetes. The feasibility test will have embedded mixed methods one-group study design. Participants: Families will answer a brief screening questionnaire. Families (n=25) that consist of at least one adult with (in risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with at least one 5-18 yeard old child, and at least one family member living sedentary lifestyle, will participate. Intervention: The 3-months long hybrid telehealth/face-to-face intervention with weekly 1-hour contacts with health professionals will deliver diabetes education and tailored support to implement more physical activity and healthy meals in the family everyday life. A 3-months long supervised maintenance phase with monthly professional contacts will be included. Outcomes: Feasibility evaluation will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The feasibility data will be the primary outcomes of the study, collected and evaluated using the predefined research progression criteria applied the green-amber-red method. Sociodemography and secondary outcomes, such as physical activity, dieting habits, daily occupations, occupational balance, health and quality of life will be assessed at baseline and 3 and 6-months follow-ups. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data from participant interviews which will nuance the feasibility evaluation. Analysis: Relevant statistical methods and qualitative analysis method will be applied. Expected results: The intervention will help families achieve sustainable lifestyle changes, e.g., diabetes stabilized blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes, increased physical activity time and improved dieting habits, for better family health and well-being. Ethics and dissemination: The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. All the results - significant, non-significant and/ or inconclusive - will be reported.
Rationale: The introduction of e-health in the monitoring and management of patients with chronic conditions can be beneficial and efficient. The introduction of an online monitoring and management tool, "Luchtbrug", for children 6-16 yrs of age with asthma while reducing 50% of visits to the outpatient clinic, results in similar or improved asthma control while reducing costs. It is highly likely that this concept of e-health is suitable for other chronic conditions. Therefore the aim of the study is to investigate the added value of online monitoring and management of children with preschool wheeze (2-6 yrs of age). Objective: To assess whether the number of symptom free days can be improved using online monitoring and disease management via Luchtbrug Junior, while reducing the number of outpatient clinic visits by 50% Study design: Prospective multicentre (n=6) randomised trial in which disease management via Luchtbrug Junior will be compared with usual care. Follow-up: 12 months. Study population: children aged 2-6 yrs with preschool wheezing (multiple episode of cough, wheeze and dyspnoea). Intervention (if applicable): Children will be randomised into usual care (n=135) or partly online care via Luchtbrug Junior (n = 135) Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary objective: Number of symptom free days (SFDs) based on the TRACK questionnaire, during the last four weeks of the study (measured at 12 months). Secondary objectives: Healthcare consumption: unscheduled visits Emergency Department (ED) or outpatient clinic, unscheduled phone calls, hospital admissions) Questionnaires into: Quality of Life (QoL), cost-effectiveness (direct and indirect costs), self-management of patients, adherence to treatment, satisfaction of parents/caregivers. Usual care consists of regular visits to the outpatient clinic every 3 months after starting the study. In between visits contact with the healthcare team is by telephone as needed. At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, patients will be asked to complete the TRACK questionnaire. Online care using Luchtbrug Junior will include visits to the outpatient clinic every 6 months after starting the study. In between visits, parents/caregivers of the patient will be asked to answer the digital version of TRACK questionnaire monthly, therefore the parents/caregivers will received email-reminders. Appropriate feedback on their TRACK-scores will be provided by their healthcare team within two working days. Any interventions such as adjustment of treatment are at the judgment of the treating pediatrician. Therapy adherence will be monitored during the study by using smart inhalers.
The goal of this pragmatic trial is to test the benefit of using a teleconsultation for referring a patient with a heart attack at an early stage from the suburban hospital to the heart centre. A teleconsultation with an expert cardiologist will be conducted by the physician at a suburban hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are: To what extent does the use of a teleconsultation for a patient with a heart attack work well in lowering the proportion of deaths among patients with heart attacks who will be referred from suburban hospitals to the heart centre? To what extent does the use of a teleconsultation for a patient with a heart attack work well in raising the proportion of stable cases with heart attacks who will be referred from suburban hospitals to the heart centre? Participants will be asked to participate in a teleconsultation referral pathway from the suburban hospital to the heart centre. Researchers will compare the change in the proportion of death rate and survivors or stable cases in the intervention versus the control group during referral from suburban hospital to heart centre. Making use of telehealth and smart applications will positively improve the quality of the provided health service at suburban hospitals where there is a limited number of specialized doctors.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn about the impact of the implementation of an intervention-based case management follow-up program during periods of clinical worsening or poor adherence in patients with moderate and severe asthma. Patients will be randomized into two arms: a case management follow-up group and a control group that will follow-up according to routine care practice. A single masking (outcomes assessor) was performed. Researchers will compare the response on exacerbations, health resource use and asthma control between the two groups during a one-year follow-up. Outcomes on pulmonary function, quality of life, adherence to treatment, pulmonary inflammation parameters and systemic corticosteroid use will also be studied. Additionally, other baseline clinical characteristics and events of the previous year will be collected retrospectively for all patients. The study was evaluated and approved by a local ethics committee. All study participants will receive an asthma education session with review of inhaler technique and training in the use of self-management action plans. Only participants in the case management follow-up group will periodically send asthma control (ACT) and adherence (TAI) questionnaires to the case manager. If not completed, the case manager will contact the patient by telephone to determine the degree of asthma control and adherence. The case manager will also monitor the withdrawal of drugs on the electronic prescription. The patient will contact the case manager via a mobile app, phone or email if needed due to worsening symptoms or need for self-management support. With this information, the case manager will make decisions based on personalized medical instructions prepared by the pulmonologist at the baseline visit, which will be reviewed according to evolution.
The primary caregivers of older adults provide intimate and immediate support when their loved one is in urgent need. Due to the full-time commitment in a caregiving role, the caregiver may not have extra time to join the onsite community services that are available to them in the daytime. With the support of advanced technology, telecare seems to be a convenient and easily accessible channel to provide individualized caregiving advice to the caregivers. This study examines the effectiveness of a telecare-based intervention programme for caregivers.
Approximately 8% of all births occur between 30-36 weeks of gestation ('moderate-late' prematurity). Respiratory tract infections (RTI) and wheezing illnesses disproportionally affect preterm infants resulting in a 1.5-2 fold higher hospitalisation rate during the first years of life compared to term born children. Besides prematurity, several other postnatal modifiable influencing factors are associated with increased risk of respiratory morbidity and impaired pulmonary development. These factors include RTI, rapid weight gain, air pollution, tobacco smoke exposition, vitamin D deficiency, maternal stress and antibiotic usage. The investigators hypothesize that a follow-up program aiming at prevention of modifiable influencing factors can reduce respiratory morbidity in moderate and late prematurity. Objectives: To reduce respiratory disease burden in moderate-late preterm infants in the first 18 months of life
This pilot study is to investigate a patient transfer path from the hospital to Hospital@Home to their general practitioners (GPs) using telemedical procedures. Telemedical support will be executed by Medgate who will refer the patients to their GPs after the telemedical consultations are completed. Inclusion criteria is the need for short time follow up procedures that can be handled by telemedicine. Throughout the study, patient and stakeholder satisfaction will be measured and data-based methods will be developed to assess patient transfer success. Overall, new information flow and communication between the stakeholders (hospital, telemedicine and general practitioners) are defined and tested. The Hospital@Home pilot study is intended to become a flagship project for new healthcare models.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gamified competition (delivered through a smartphone) for improving the physical activity and sleep of medical interns.