View clinical trials related to Teen Pregnancy Prevention.
Filter by:Under contract to the Office of Population Affairs (OPA), Mathematica is conducting an impact study of the Making Proud Choices! (MPC) teen pregnancy prevention program. The impact study is designed to estimate the impact of MPC, compared to the business-as-usual condition, on risk and protective factors, sexual behaviors, and longer term health goals including pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.
An evaluation of a promising Teen Pregnancy Prevention Curriculum, Big Decisions, in ninth grade students in three high schools in South Texas.
To test a new curriculum designed by Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and Hawaiian Islands (PPGNHI). The Linking Families and teens (LiFT) curriculum is an innovative program designed for families in rural communities, with the goal of reducing unplanned teen pregnancies by increasing family connectedness and increasing youth's self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills related to sexual health.
Under contract to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Mathematica is conducting an impact study of California Department of Public Health, Center for Family Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health's (MCAH) Adolescent Family Life Program Positive Youth Development (PYD) program for a Federal Evaluation of Programs for Expectant and Parenting Youth (PEPY). The impact study will be designed to address the impact of PYD, compared to the business-as-usual condition, AFLP, in delaying repeat pregnancies, completing high school, improving health of the parent and child, and improving linkages and networks of support for expectant and parenting teens.
The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of the offer to participate in the e-Practice Self-Regulation (e-PS-R) (treatment) relative to the control condition on increasing knowledge of sexual health and the impact of trauma on sexual decision-making and preventing teen pregnancy and high-risk behaviors 12 months after enrollment.
The purpose of the study is to determine if exposure to the "Plan A" video influences viewers' uptake of LARC, reduces unprotected sexual activity, and increases receipt of STI testing.
The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of the offer to participate in the Practice Self-Regulation (PS-R) (treatment) relative to the offer to participate in the Therapy Practice Group (control) on participants' reported number of sexual partners and reported number of times having sex without a condom nine months after the end of treatment.
Although the Academy of Pediatrics and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine recommend that teen health providers screen for sexual risk behaviors and provide education and counseling to those at risk, there are currently no specific guidelines or protocols available to guide such practices, nor have there been any rigorous evaluations of efficacy. Preventing teen pregnancy through brief intervention in primary care holds the promise to have a significant public health impact and reduce health disparities by engaging, educating, and motivating the majority of teens who visit a primary care setting each year. In the current study, we seek to rigorously evaluate the impact of brief intervention vs. informational control on unprotected sexual intercourse among teens with past year unprotected sex at two primary care clinics serving predominately underserved, minority populations in New Mexico. The target population for the current study will be 1350 male and female teens, aged 13-19, from the Atrisco Center for Family and Community Health and the Albuquerque Job Corps Wellness Center. Extensive formative work involving the study population will be conducted prior to the trial to refine the motivational interviewing-based brief intervention. Eligible youth will be randomly assigned to brief intervention or an informational control condition, in addition to regularly offered medically-based contraception consultation and prescription services. Follow-ups at 3- and 9- months will compare rates of unprotected sex and acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptives. Brief education and counseling interventions could be feasibly implemented during the greater than eight preventive and acute primary care visits that the average US adolescent attends during their teen years. Such an approach could conserve valuable resources required by more intensive interventions for nonresponsive teens with greater need. Furthermore, social determinants of health, such as poverty and race, that may reduce access to more extensive psychosocial interventions, are less likely to prevent access to primary care, increasing health equity.
The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of the offer to participate in Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) (treatment) relative to the offer to participate in Female Sexual Health (control) on three self-reported sexual behaviors (condom use, other contraceptive use, and frequency of sex) six months after the end of treatment.
The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of the offer to participate in Becoming a Responsible Teen (BART) (treatment) relative to the offer to participate in Healthy Living (control) on two self-reported sexual behaviors (condom use and frequency of sex) six months after the end of treatment.