Tardive Dyskinesia Clinical Trial
— RIM-TDOfficial title:
An Open-Label, Long-Term Safety Study of SD-809 (Deutetrabenazine) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Tardive Dyskinesia
Verified date | March 2022 |
Source | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SD-809 in reducing the severity of abnormal involuntary movements of moderate to severe tardive dyskinesia. The purpose of part B is to establish the durability of effect of SD-809 following 1-week period of randomized withdrawal (SD-809 and placebo), followed by 12 weeks of maintenance with SD-809.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 343 |
Est. completion date | December 14, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 6, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - History of using a dopamine receptor antagonist for at least 3 months - Clinical diagnosis of tardive dyskinesia and has had symptoms for at least 3 months prior to screening - Participant has successfully completed a controlled study of SD-809 for treatment of moderate to severe tardive dyskinesia - Participants with underlying psychiatric diagnosis are stable and have no change in psychoactive medications - Have a mental health provider and does not anticipate any changes to treatment regimen in the next 3 months - History of being compliant with prescribed medications - Able to swallow study drug whole - Be in good general health and is expected to attend all study visits and complete study assessments - Female participants must not be pregnant and agree to an acceptable method of contraception Exclusion Criteria: - Currently receiving medication for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia - Have a neurological condition other than tardive dyskinesia that may interfere with assessing the severity of dyskinesias - Have a serious untreated or undertreated psychiatric illness - Have recent history or presence of violent behavior - Have unstable or serious medical illness - Have evidence of hepatic impairment - Have evidence of renal impairment - Have known allergy to any component of SD-809 or tetrabenazine - Has participated in an investigational drug or device trial (other than Study C-18, Study C-23, or any other eligible TEV-50717 parent study) and received study drug within 30 days - Have acknowledged use of illicit drugs - Have a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the previous 12 months |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 559 | Havirov | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 556 | Hostivice | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 535 | Litomerice | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 557 | Plzen | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 533 | Prague 10 | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 530 | Prague 6 | |
Germany | Teva Investigational Site 502 | Gera | |
Germany | Teva Investigational Site 504 | Mainz | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 540 | Balassagyarmat | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 538 | Budapest | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 541 | Budapest | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 539 | Doba | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 546 | Gyor | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 545 | Kalocsa | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 514 | Belchatow | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 554 | Bialystok | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 510 | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 519 | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 536 | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 523 | Chelmno | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 517 | Choroszcz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 513 | Gdansk | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 512 | Katowice | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 552 | Katowice | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 509 | Krakow | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 520 | Krakow | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 508 | Lodz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 511 | Lublin | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 524 | Lublin | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 549 | Olsztyn | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 522 | Torun | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 550 | Warszawa | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 516 | Wroclaw | |
Slovakia | Teva Investigational Site 529 | Bratislava | |
Slovakia | Teva Investigational Site 525 | Hronovce | |
Slovakia | Teva Investigational Site 527 | Kosice | |
Slovakia | Teva Investigational Site 528 | Rimavska Sobota | |
Slovakia | Teva Investigational Site 526 | Roznava | |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 128 | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 107 | Anaheim | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 108 | Anaheim | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 155 | Augusta | Georgia |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 154 | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 157 | Boca Raton | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 133 | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 131 | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 118 | Creve Coeur | Missouri |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 165 | Decatur | Georgia |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 129 | Englewood | Colorado |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 151 | Fort Worth | Texas |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 117 | Gainesville | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 114 | Garfield Heights | Ohio |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 101 | Glen Burnie | Maryland |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 123 | Glendale | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 160 | Irvine | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 142 | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 150 | Lake City | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 178 | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 176 | Loma Linda | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 121 | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 147 | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 149 | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 153 | Miami | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 162 | Miami | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 139 | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 174 | Norwalk | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 130 | Oceanside | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 102 | Orange | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 112 | Orlando | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 144 | Port Charlotte | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 146 | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 167 | Richland | Washington |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 161 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 175 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 115 | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 141 | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 104 | San Bernardino | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 110 | San Diego | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 169 | San Rafael | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 145 | Tuscaloosa | Alabama |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 156 | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 166 | Waukesha | Wisconsin |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
United States, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Part A, B, and C: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, Drug-Related TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal | AEs were analyzed as one group combined for parts A and B per planned analysis. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severe AE=prevents normal daily activities. Drug-related TEAEs: TEAEs with possible, probable, or definite relationship to study drug. Serious AEs: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that began after the first administration of study medication or existing AEs that worsened after the first dose of study medication. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section. | Baseline up to the end of follow-up (4 weeks after the last dose of study drug; mean exposure: up to approximately 866.1 days) | |
Primary | Part B: Change From Day 1 Visit in Total Motor AIMS Score at Day 7 Visit, as Assessed by Blinded Central Video Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Day 1 of Part B, Day 7 of Part B | |
Secondary | Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score at Week 145, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of tardive dyskinesia (TD) over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline, Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score at Week 158, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline, Week 158 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score at Week 145, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline, Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score at Week 158, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline, Week 158 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Had a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline to Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Had a 70% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Total Motor AIMS Score, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. A total motor score from Items 1 to 7 (orofacial, extremity, and truncal movements) was calculated. Items 1 through 7 included facial and oral movements (Items 1-4), extremity movements (Items 5-6), and trunk movements (Item 7). Each item was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia). Total motor AIMS score for Items 1-7 ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicative of more severe dyskinesia. | Baseline to Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Change From Baseline in AIMS Items 8, 9, and 10 Score at Week 145, as Assessed by the Site Rating | The AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and -scored items. Items 8 to 10 deal with global severity as judged by the examiner, and the participant's awareness of the movements and the distress associated with them. Item 8 (used as an overall severity index indicating severity of abnormal movements) was rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinetic movements) to 4 (severe dyskinetic movements). Items 9 and 10 (provide additional information with regard to participant's incapacitation due to abnormal movements and participant's awareness of abnormal movements) were rated on a 5-point anchored scale ranging from 0 (none or no awareness) to 4 (severe or aware, severe distress). Higher scores indicated more severe disease. | Baseline, Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Were a Treatment Success, Based on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) | A treatment success was defined as much or very much improved on the CGIC from baseline of this study. The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire that asks the investigator to assess a participant's TD symptoms at specific visits/weeks after initiating therapy. The CGIC uses a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from -3 to +3 (-3 = very much worse, -2 = much worse, -1 = minimally worse, 0 = not changed, 1 = minimally improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = very much improved), to assess overall response to therapy. | Baseline up to Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Were a Treatment Success, Based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | A treatment success was defined as much or very much improved on the PGIC from baseline of this study. The PGIC is single-item questionnaire that asks the participant to assess their TD symptoms at specific visits/weeks after initiating therapy. The PGIC uses a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from -3 to +3 (-3 = very much worse, -2 = much worse, -1 = minimally worse, 0 = not changed, 1 = minimally improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = very much improved), to assess overall response to therapy. | Baseline up to Week 145 | |
Secondary | Part A: Change From Baseline in Modified CDQ-24 Score at Week 158 | The CDQ-24 is a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire developed for use in participants with craniocervical dystonia, including both cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm (BPS). The CDQ-24 was modified such that the questions focus more directly on the impact of TD (as opposed to CD/BPS) on quality of life. The following domains were evaluated in the mCDQ-24: stigma, emotional well-being, pain, activities of daily living, and social/family life. Each of the 24 questions were rated by participants on a scale of 0 = never or no impairment to 4 = always or very severe impairment. Total score ranged from 0 - 96, with higher score indicative of severe impairment. | Baseline, Week 158 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02840760 -
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of the Tardive Dyskinesia.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01688037 -
NBI-98854 for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia in Subjects With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder (KINECT Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01391390 -
Melatonin Treatment for Tardive Dyskinesia in Schizophrenia
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03254186 -
Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02291861 -
Addressing Involuntary Movements in Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02274558 -
A Phase 3 Study of NBI-98854 for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01467089 -
The Assessment of Movement Disorders Utilizing Live Two-Way Video
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04794413 -
Pimavanserin Treatment in TS
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06011408 -
Remote Monitoring and Detecting of Tardive Dyskinesia for Improving Patient Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05859698 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Valbenazine on Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes in Participants With Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02252380 -
ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS for the Management of Treatment-Refractory Movement Disorders
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00917293 -
Safety and Efficacy of Pyridoxal 5' -Phosphate in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01543321 -
Xenazine in Late Dyskinetic Syndrome With Neuroleptics
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02405091 -
Safety and Tolerability Study of NBI-98854 for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03176771 -
Efficacy and Safety of MT-5199 in Subjects With Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02524886 -
Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients With Tardive Dyskinesia and or Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02195700 -
Aim to Reduce Movements in Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02736955 -
Rollover Study for Continuing Valbenazine (NBI-98854) Administration for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03497013 -
Effect of tDCS on Cognition, Symptoms in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients With Tardive Dyskinesia
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01908452 -
Pyridoxal Kinase Activity in Tardive Dyskinesia
|
Phase 3 |