Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02975336
Other study ID # MS200527-0018
Secondary ID 2016-002950-19
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date January 4, 2017
Est. completion date March 23, 2020

Study information

Verified date March 2021
Source EMD Serono
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 469
Est. completion date March 23, 2020
Est. primary completion date November 27, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Eligible male and female participants, aged 18 to 75 years - Must have diagnosis of SLE with either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE, or at least four of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, of at least six months duration prior to Screening - SLEDAI-2K total score greater than or equal to (>=) 6 (including clinical SLEDAI greater than or equal to (>=) 4) at Screening Visit - And be positive for anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and/or anti-nuclear antibody (ANA greater than or equal to (>=) 1:80) and/or anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at the time of Screening - Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply Exclusion Criteria: - Participants are not eligible for this study if they have active, clinically significant interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension - Proteinuria (urine protein to creatinine ratio [UPCR] > 4 mg/mg) - Acutely worsened renal function - Central nervous system SLE - Or within two weeks prior to Screening or during Screening: use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 mg daily prednisone equivalent - Use of injectable corticosteroids, or change in dose of corticosteroids. - Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to M2951 orally for 52 weeks.
M2951
Participants received 25 milligrams (mg) of M2951 orally once daily (QD) for 52 weeks.
M2951
Participants received 75 mg of M2951 orally QD for 52 weeks.
M2951
Participants received 50 mg of M2951 orally twice daily (BID) for 52 weeks.
M2951
Participants who had received Placebo or M2951 (25 mg QD, 75 mg QD or 50 mg BID) during DBPC period were switched to receive 50 mg M2951 orally BID in LTE period for 104 weeks.

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina APRILLUS Ciudad Autonoma Buenos aires
Argentina Centro Medico Dra Laura Maffei Investigacion Clinica Aplicada Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Clinica Adventista Belgrano Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Sanatorio Allende Cordoba
Argentina Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Mar del Plata Buenos Aires
Argentina Instituto de Reumatologia Mendoza
Argentina Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes Quilmes Buenos Aires
Argentina Cordis S.A. Salta
Argentina Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER San Juan
Argentina Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia San Miguel de Tucuman Tucuman
Argentina Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman San Miguel de Tucuman Tucuman
Argentina Centro Integral de Reumatologia San Miguel de Tucumán Tucuman
Bulgaria UMHAT "Pulmed" OOD Plovdiv
Bulgaria MHAT - Ruse, AD Ruse
Bulgaria Medizinski Zentar-1-Sevlievo EOOD Sevlievo
Bulgaria Medical Center "Excelsior", OOD Sofia
Bulgaria Medical Center Comac Medical EOOD Sofia
Bulgaria UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD Sofia
Bulgaria UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD Sofia
Chile Corporacion de Beneficencia Osorno Osorno
Chile Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos Santiago
Chile Centro Medico Prosalud Santiago
Chile Interin Santiago
Chile Psicomedica Clinical and Research Group Santiago
Chile Quantum Research Santiago Santiago
Colombia Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia SAS Barranquilla
Colombia Clínica de la Costa Ltda. Barranquilla
Colombia Fundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem Bogota
Colombia Simedics Ips Sas Bogotá
Colombia Servimed S.A.S. Bucaramanga
Germany Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte Berlin
Italy Ospedale San Raffaele Milano
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria- Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Napoli
Italy Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera di Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia
Italy Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Roma
Italy Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Milano
Japan NHO Asahikawa Medical Center Asahikawa-shi Hokkaido
Japan St. Luke's International Hospital Chuo-ku Tokyo-To
Japan Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center Fuchu-shi Tokyo-To
Japan Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital Hamamatsu-shi Shizuoka-Ken
Japan Nihon University Itabashi Hospital Itabashi-ku Tokyo-To
Japan Eiraku Clinic Kagoshima-shi Kagoshima-Ken
Japan Kanazawa University Hospital Kanazawa-shi Ishikawa-Ken
Japan Kagawa University Hospital Kita-gun Kagawa-Ken
Japan Tobata General Hospital Kitakyushu-shi Fukuoka-Ken
Japan University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital Kitakyushu-shi Fukuoka-Ken
Japan Tohoku University Hospital Sendai-shi Miyagi-Ken
Japan Dokkyo Medical University Hospital Shimotsuga-gun Tochigi-Ken
Japan Keio University Hospital Shinjuku-ku Tokyo-To
Japan Ehime University Hospital Toon-shi Ehime-Ken
Japan Tottori University Hospital Yonago-shi Tottori-Ken
Korea, Republic of Dong-A University Hospital Busan
Korea, Republic of Kyungpook National University Hospital Daegu
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University Medical Center Seoul
Korea, Republic of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Seoul
Korea, Republic of The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Ajou University Hospital Suwon-si Gyeonggi-do
Malaysia Hospital Selayang Batu Caves Selangor
Malaysia International Medical University (IMU) Healthcare Bukit Jalil Selangor
Malaysia Hospital Kuala Lumpur Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia Hospital Umum Sarawak Kuching Sarawak
Malaysia Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah Muar Johor
Mauritius CAP Research Solferino-Phoenix
Mexico Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C. Chihuahua
Mexico Unidad de Investigacion de las Enfermedades Reumaticas Cuauhtemoc Distrito Federal
Mexico Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C. Guadalajara Jalisco
Mexico Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC Guadalajara Jalisco
Mexico Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C. Leon Guanajuato
Mexico Clinstile, S.A. de C.V. Mexico Distrito Federal
Mexico Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V. Monterrey Nuevo León
Mexico Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto San Luis Potosi San Luis Potos
Mexico Clinical Research Institute S.C. Tlalnepantla Estado De Mexico
Peru Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa Arequipa
Peru Clinica El Golf Lima
Peru Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia Lima
Peru Clinica San Juan Bautista Lima
Peru Clinica Vesalio Lima
Peru GINOBS SA. Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproduccion Lima
Peru Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia Lima
Peru University of Washington Medical Center Lima
Peru ICCV Research Instituto del Cerebro y la Columna Vertebral Miraflores
Philippines Angeles University Foundation Medical Center Angeles City, Pampanga
Philippines Mary Mediatrix Medical Center Batangas
Philippines De La Salle University Medical Center Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Philippines Davao Doctors Hospital Davao City
Philippines Southern Philippines Medical Center Davao City
Philippines Iloilo Doctors Hospital Iloilo City
Philippines St. Luke's Medical Center Quezon City
Poland CERMED Bialystok
Poland Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela Bydgoszcz
Poland Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. Barbara Bazela Elblag
Poland Centrum Medyczne Plejady Krakow
Poland Nzoz Atopia Krakow
Poland Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Warsawa
Romania Spitalul Clinic "Dr.I. Cantacuzino" Bucuresti
Romania Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria" Bucuresti
Romania S.C Mediab S.R.L Tirgu Mures
Russian Federation LLC "Alliance Biomedical - Ural Group" Izhevsk
Russian Federation TSBIH "Krasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.S. Karpovich Krasnoyarsk
Russian Federation HMA - Hospital Maria Auxiliadora Moscow
Russian Federation Ultramed Omsk
Russian Federation LLC Medical Sanitary Unit#157 Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25" Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation SIH "Saratov City Clinical Hospital # 12" Saratov
Russian Federation Research Institute of Emergency Medical Care St. Petersburg
Russian Federation Nebbiolo LLC Tomsk
South Africa Naidoo, A - Netcare Umhlanga Hospital Durban
South Africa Wits Clinical Research Johannesburg Gauteng
South Africa Winelands Medical Research Centre Stellenbosch Western Cape
Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung
Taiwan Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung
Taiwan Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung
United States Advanced Research Center, Inc. Anaheim California
United States Pinnacle Research Group LLC Anniston Alabama
United States University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado
United States Wallace Rheumatic Study Center Beverly Hills California
United States Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
United States Montefiore Medical Center PRIME Bronx New York
United States University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina
United States The University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois
United States Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate Clearwater Florida
United States Medvin Clinical Research Covina California
United States Metroplex Clinical Research Center, LLC Dallas Texas
United States Omega Research Consultants DeBary Florida
United States Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan
United States AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center Flint Michigan
United States Southern California Permanent Medical Group Fontana California
United States Center for Rheumatology, Immunology & Arthritis Fort Lauderdale Florida
United States Global Research Management Glendale California
United States Medication Management, LLC Greensboro North Carolina
United States Innovative Clinical Research, LLC Greenville South Carolina
United States Accurate Clinical Management - Brionez Houston Texas
United States Accurate Clinical Research, Inc. Houston Texas
United States University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson Mississippi
United States University of Southern California Los Angeles California
United States Marietta Rheumatology Associates, PC Marietta Georgia
United States Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C. Mesa Arizona
United States Hope Clinical Trials Miami Florida
United States Yale School Of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
United States Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
United States Medical Center Research, LLC Webster Office Pearland Texas
United States Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C. Phoenix Arizona
United States Allegheny-Singer Research Institute Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States IRIS Research and Development Plantation Florida
United States Washington University in St. Louis Saint Louis Missouri
United States East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc. San Leandro California
United States FSAEI HE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF Seattle Washington
United States LSU Health Sciences Center Gastroenterology Shreveport Louisiana
United States SUNY Upstate Medical Center Syracuse New York
United States McIlwain Medical Group, PA Tampa Florida
United States Meridien Research, Inc. Tampa Florida
United States DM Clinical Research Tomball Texas
United States Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc. Upland California
United States Nazanin Firooz, MD Inc. West Hills California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Argentina,  Bulgaria,  Chile,  Colombia,  Germany,  Italy,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Malaysia,  Mauritius,  Mexico,  Peru,  Philippines,  Poland,  Romania,  Russian Federation,  South Africa,  Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03) Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 56 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported. Baseline up to Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03) Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. Baseline up to Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Baseline up to Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings 12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported. Baseline up to Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Baseline up to Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 2. Week 2
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 4. Week 4
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 12. Week 12
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 24. Week 24
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 36. Week 36
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 52 Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56 Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 56 Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 4 Mean total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Week 4
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 24 Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Week 24
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 52 Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 56 Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 2
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 4
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 12
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 24
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 36
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56 Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. Baseline and Week 56
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 4 Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Baseline and Week 4
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 24 Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Baseline and Week 24
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 52 Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Baseline and Week 52
Primary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 56 Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. Baseline and Week 56
Secondary DBPC Period: Time to First Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A Flare BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. Time to first severe flare, where a severe flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (Severe disease activity) score in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52-Week Treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. Baseline up to Week 56
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 in Serologically Active (SA) Subgroup SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Time to First British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Moderate to Severe Flare BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. A Moderate to Severe (BILAG A or 2B) flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (severe disease activity) grade or two BILAG B (moderate disease activity) grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. Baseline up to Week 56
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Flare-Free Status During the 52-Week Treatment Period A participant has a flare-free status if no flare has been reported during the 52-week treatment period. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 52, without having a flare are counted as not being flare free at Week 52. A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. up to Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Annualized Flare Rate A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG 2004 assessment. Baseline up to Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52 Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52 Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Clinical SLEDAI-2K score is equal to the SLEDAI-2K score from electronic case report form (eCRF) excluding the components 'Increased Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Binding' and 'Low Complement'. Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 CLASI is an validated measurement instrument for lupus erythematosus developed for use in clinical studies that consists of separate scores for the activity of the disease (CLASI-A). The CLASI activity score is calculated on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Severity categories based on the CLASI activity score are as follows: mild (0-9), moderate (10-20), and severe (21-70). Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 52 BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: [1] At least one gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry (example: all A (severe disease) scores falling to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity) and all B scores falling to C or D; [2] No new BILAG A or more than one new BILAG B scores; [3] No worsening of total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; [4] No significant deterioration (=<10%) in physician's global assessment and [5] No treatment failure (initiation of non-protocol treatment). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 BILAG 2004 disease activity Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score and Mental Component Summary Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 - 100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning). Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. Responses were used to generate a weighted summary index (EQ-5D index), which ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). A higher score indicates better health and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of health. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. The responses were used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 was the worst health you can imagine and 100 was the best health you can imagine. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 The Lupus QoL assessment is a 34 item questionnaire across 8 domains that is designed to find out how systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects a participant's life. Domains include physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4=never, 3=occasionally, 2= a good bit of the time, 1=most of the time, and 0=worst of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better health related QoL. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score of Any Improvement, no Change and Any Worsening The PGIC is a self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life (QoL) related to the participants painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of any improvement (that is PGIC scale score 1, 2 or 3), no change (that is PGIC scale score 4) and any worsening (that is PGIC scale score 5, 6 or 7) are reported. Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose by >=25% to a Dose of <=7.5 Milligram Per Day (mg/Day), With no BILAG A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity at Week 52 BILAG A or 2B flare is defined as at least one BILAG A grade or two BILAG B grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment period. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. Baseline and Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent CS Daily Dose at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported. Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported. Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Cumulative Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose at Week 52 Cumulative Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose was calculated at Week 52. Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on SRI-4 at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well(0)-very poor(100). Week 52
Secondary DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 52 Lupus low disease activity state will be measured as: SLEDAI-2K <= 4; No activity in any major organ systems (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); No new features of disease activity compared with the previous assessment; Prednisone-equivalent <= 7.5 milligram per day; Unchanged background immunosuppressive therapy. Week 52
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT03843125 - A Study of Baricitinib in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05698173 - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Accelerated Aging N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01649765 - Pediatric Lupus Trial of Belimumab Plus Background Standard Therapy Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05704153 - Modelling and Control of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Autoimmune Diseases (1A) N/A
Completed NCT05048238 - Evaluation of Tofacitinib in Prevention of Photosensitivity in Lupus Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06056778 - The Prevalence Evaluation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Russian Patients With Reproductive Issues (PRISMA)
Completed NCT04358302 - Individual Patient Exposure and Response in Pediatric Lupus N/A
Completed NCT03802578 - The Impact of Exercise on Hand Function, Daily Activities Performance and Quality of Life of SLE' Patients N/A
Completed NCT02554019 - Proof-of-Concept Study With BT063 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04835883 - Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of CS20AT04 (Allogenic Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Phase 2
Terminated NCT02665364 - Phase IIb Study of IFN-K in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2
Completed NCT00278538 - Cyclophosphamide and Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG)/Rituximab in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2
Completed NCT00069342 - Health Beliefs and Health Behaviors Among Minorities With Rheumatic Diseases
Completed NCT03252587 - An Investigational Study to Evaluate BMS-986165 in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2
Terminated NCT02066311 - Nelfinavir in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2
Recruiting NCT01892748 - Cholecalciferol Supplementation on Disease Activity, Fatigue and Bone Mass on Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N/A
Terminated NCT01689025 - An Investigation of Safety and Tolerability of NNC0114-0006 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Phase 1
Unknown status NCT01712529 - Physical Exercise, Endothelial Function and Progenitor Endothelial Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients N/A
Completed NCT01475149 - Effect of HCQ on AnxA5 Resistance Assay in Antiphospholipid (aPL) Positive Patients With and Without Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) N/A
Completed NCT00962832 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rontalizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Phase 2