View clinical trials related to Surgical Wound.
Filter by:A Randomized controlled trail to To assess the efficacy of povidone-iodine wash before wound closure in preventing surgical site infections.
The purpose of this study is to determine the potential influence of sun protection on the aesthetic outcome of post-surgical scars following the reconstruction of Mohs micrographic surgery defects via linear repair. This study will be performed as a randomized split-wound study. Half of the wound will be treated with zinc containing sunscreen and the other half of the wound would not be treated. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be evaluated via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument, as well as a colorimeter to measure the amount of vascularity, and hyperpigmentation between the treated and the non-treated area compared to the 'surrounding skin' defined as skin in the proximity but not adjacent to the wound. Any adverse events will also be recorded.
This is a retrospective, observational (non-interventional), single-arm, single-centre, post-market clinical investigation designed to verify clinical performance and safety of Mepilex Border Post-Op when used according to clinical practice for post-operative wounds in a large and broad population. The clinical investigation will consist of a retrospective medical record review, which will be completed with data from up to 450 female and male adult subjects who were treated with Mepilex Border Post-Op following elective hip or knee replacement at one clinic in Belgium between January 2016 and February 2021.
The purpose of the study is to study the incidence of surgical site infection when patients are given local versus parenteral antibiotics
INTRODUCTION Liquid skin adhesive (LSA) has benefits over other closure methods. Especially it is less invasive, quicker to apply, and better in cosmesis. Also LSA applied wounds need no post-care and its water-proof nature allows patients to take a shower immediate postoperative periods. While traditional sutures and skin staples are invasive and have infection chance requiring regular wound dressings, LSA is resistant against both water and microbial infection without need for postoperative dressings. Thus LSA-applied wounds need no professional care saving wound management cost. This study investigated not only the safety and efficacy of LSA, but also the cost-effectiveness in the context of total wound management resources including man-power, time, and cost. STUDY OBJECTIVE Primary end point of this study is time requiring to manage surgical wound calculated as man hour. Secondary end points are wound related complication and cost for management of surgical wound. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The target number of the enrollment were calculated under the hypothesis that the wound management time for stapler group would be 1560 sec and that for LSA group be 264 sec with 10% drop-out rate. The sample number calculation formula of the t-test for independent 2 groups were used. For two-sided validation with the significance level of 0.05, and the power of 0.8, 29 patients for each group were estimated.
This randomized trial will use a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy device or standard wound closure, in participants with gastrointestinal neoplasms, to measure the rate of surgical site infections
Prospective, single-blinded, single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess rate and frequency of wound healing and associated financial savings, when using Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care as a choice of debridement method, where both arms follow normal wound care practice in use of advanced wound care treatments.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of a personal hand hygiene system (SafeHavenTM) by anesthesia providers in the adult operating room, combined with a novel infectious pathogen tracking system (OR PathTrac) will decrease participant exposure to pathologic bacteria in the adult operating room.
Comparison between waterproof sterile dressing OPSITE Post-Op Visible, Smith & Nephew, UK and PICO-7, Smith & Nephew, UK in terms of inguinal surgical wound infection and complications after lower limb revascularization.
In the last decade we have been exposed to the complication of a caesarean section called a "niche". A niche is an anaerobic defect in the location of the cesarean section, which represents the discontinuity of the endometrium and myometrium. A niche is usually diagnosed by ultrasound, and can also be diagnosed by hysterosalpingogram or hysteroscopy. In the presence of a niche women suffer more frequently from irregular bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. We believe that a combination of tissue ischemia and thinning of the scar tissue that forms, causes a niche to form. Large randomized studies regarding the preferred surgical technique in cesarean section, including various methods of incision closure have found that there is no single method that is obviously superior. However, these studies did not examine niche formation as a complication of cesarean section. In this study we will examine whether a unique incision closure method reduces post-cesarean niche formation.