Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05920122
Other study ID # STUDY23030049
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date October 9, 2023
Est. completion date June 1, 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source University of Pittsburgh
Contact Yaneve Fonge, MD
Phone 412-641-6331
Email Fongeyn@upmc.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This will be a single-center randomized control trial comparing the efficacy of two different formulations of Chlorhexidine surgical skin preparation in preventing cesarean section wound infections. Participants will be randomized to either 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate aqueous solution (CHG) or 2% Chlorhexidine with isopropyl alcohol (CHG-IPA) 70% to examine the risk of infectious morbidity in those undergoing cesarean delivery. There will also be a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two preoperative skin preparations.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1470
Est. completion date June 1, 2025
Est. primary completion date October 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Women undergoing cesarean delivery at Magee Women's Hospital Exclusion Criteria: - Inability to obtain consent (language barrier, emergency cesarean section etc.) - Allergy to chlorhexidine or alcohol - Chorioamnionitis - Emergency cesareans where cannot wait for chlorhexidine alcohol to dry - bowel injury at time of cesarean section - Women who are delivered at another institution and are transferred postpartum to Magees Women's Hospital

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
2% Chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% alcohol
Patients will be prepared similarly using the appropriate number of 26mL Chloraprep sticks for their body surface area. The lever will be pinched to activate the ampoule and release the antiseptic. The solution will be given time to partially load in the sponge. The sponge will be pressed against the skin area where the incision is intended moving back and forth for 30 sec , then working up towards the upper edge of the surgical field and then working from below the incision sight to the upper thighs. The antiseptic will be given time to dry (3 min)
4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate aqueous solution
Patients will be scrubbed preoperative with an applicator that contain 4% chlorohexidine aqueous solution (3 consecutive applications) liberally over 2 minutes followed by drying with sterile towel. The area scrubbed will be the same as the chloraprep group.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Yaneve Fonge

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (13)

Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G, Wilson RD. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):533-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 15. — View Citation

Costantine MM, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, Byers BD, Longo M, Wen T, Hankins GD, Saade GR. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):301.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.077. — View Citation

Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, Alsharif A, Berger DH. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988. — View Citation

Dumville JC, McFarlane E, Edwards P, Lipp A, Holmes A, Liu Z. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 21;2015(4):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub4. — View Citation

Ferrannini E, Santoro D, Manicardi V. The association of essential hypertension and diabetes. Compr Ther. 1989 Nov;15(11):51-8. — View Citation

Hadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS, Masuzawa Y, da Silva Lopes K, Ota E. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5. — View Citation

Levin I, Amer-Alshiek J, Avni A, Lessing JB, Satel A, Almog B. Chlorhexidine and alcohol versus povidone-iodine for antisepsis in gynecological surgery. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):321-4. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2391. Epub 2011 Feb 16. — View Citation

Maiwald M, Chan ES. Pitfalls in evidence assessment: the case of chlorhexidine and alcohol in skin antisepsis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Aug;69(8):2017-21. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku121. Epub 2014 Apr 28. — View Citation

Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Williams MV, Tsai TC, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):483-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18614. — View Citation

Saeed KB, Greene RA, Corcoran P, O'Neill SM. Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e013037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013037. — View Citation

Springel EH, Wang XY, Sarfoh VM, Stetzer BP, Weight SA, Mercer BM. A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):463.e1-463.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.060. Epub 2017 Jun 7. — View Citation

Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, Franz C, Song P, Yamin CK, Keohane C, Denham CR, Bates DW. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23;173(22):2039-46. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763. — View Citation

Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:81-88. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876. eCollection 2017. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants with Surgical site Infection Superficial or deep surgical-site infection within 30 days after cesarean delivery, on the basis of the National Healthcare Safety Network definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Within 30 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants With Endometritis Within 30 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants with intrabdominal/pelvic abscess Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants with necrotizing fasciitis Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants with sepsis With wound/uterine infection as the source Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Length of Hospital Stay Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants With Re-admissions or Office Visits for Wound-related Problems Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants with ICU admission for wound infectious complications Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants with Need for wound opening, exploration, or washout in the operating room Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants who needed wound vacuum Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants who needed home health Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of patients who needed antibiotics will also collect route of antibiotic administration and duration of treatment to assist with cost analysis Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of doses of antibiotic treatment for wound infection complications Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Antibiotic regimens (medication names) used to treat infection for wound infection complications Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of participants with positive culture from wound Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary The type of bacterial species isolated from wound infection cultures Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of participants with hematoma Within 90 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of participants with seroma Within 30 days post cesarean
Secondary Number of Participants With Skin Irritation within 48 hours from delivery
Secondary Number of Participants With Allergic Reaction within 48 hours from delivery
Secondary Cost Savings costs (dollars) associated with a hospital stay, office visits and re-admissions for infection-related complications, ICU admission for infectious complications, wound exploration or washout in the operating room, wound vacuum use, home health, antibiotic prescriptions, and duration of treatment will be collected and used to calculate the cost of wound infection management. The cost difference between groups will be calculated to estimate cost savings. Within 90 days post cesarean
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04096885 - The Inselspital Surgical Cohort Study
Terminated NCT03820648 - Wound Protector Dual-ring Alexis® in Pancreaticoduodenectomy N/A
Completed NCT04067843 - Effect of Photodynamic Treatment on Skin Microbiome. Single Center Study N/A
Terminated NCT04042077 - Delafloxacin IV and OS Administration Compared to Best Available Therapy in Patients With Surgical Site Infections Phase 3
Completed NCT05841576 - Anaesthetic Management Guided by COMET Measurements N/A
Withdrawn NCT05338281 - NPWT for Abdominal Incisions in DIEP Reconstructions: A RCT N/A
Recruiting NCT03042091 - Neomycin and Metronidazole Hydrochloride With or Without Polyethylene Glycol in Reducing Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery Early Phase 1
Completed NCT01697748 - Prospective Study on Cesarean Wound Outcomes N/A
Terminated NCT01789697 - Text Message Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05966961 - Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Recruiting NCT05077592 - Addition of Pre-wound Closure Povidone Iodine Wash Versus Direct Wound Closure Effect on Surgical Site Infections Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05502380 - Broad-spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Tumor and Infected Orthopedic Surgery Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05763602 - PVI to Prevent S. Aureus SSI After Fixation of HELEF (POTENT Study) Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03221023 - Intrawound Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Neural Stimulator Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03257202 - Topical Treatment and Prevalence of P. Acnes Phase 2
Completed NCT06154720 - Surgical Site Infection After Episiotomy Repair Related to Routine Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Low-Risk Population
Not yet recruiting NCT04820075 - Efficacy of an Intervention to Improve the Preoperative Shower in Scheduled Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03561376 - Zinc Oxide Versus Petrolatum Following Skin Surgery Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT04496180 - Prevena to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Emergency Abdominal Laparotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04676841 - Wound Contamination During Orthopaedic Surgery

External Links