Clinical Trials Logo

Surgical Field clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Surgical Field.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06381401 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Postoperative Pain

Bupivacaine 0.125% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tympanomastoid Surgeries in Adults

Start date: April 25, 2024
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Bleeding is one of the most common complications in tympanomastoid surgery that could prolong the time of operation and also might lead to morbidity. Pain is also one of the most annoying complications of tympanomastoid surgeries. Thus, adequate surgical field visualization is utmost important. A bloodless field allows optimal exposure and identification of vital neurovascular structures. Even small bleeding, inconsequential for the patient's volume status, can create great technical difficulty in the confined space of the tympan, leading to prolonged surgery, incomplete procedures, and increased complications. The use of regional nerve blocks as an alternative to hypotensive anesthesia has gained popularity in recent years. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides effective analgesia and reduces sympathetic activity, resulting in reduced bleeding and improved surgical conditions. The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) provides sensory innervation to the ear and surrounding structures, reducing pain perception during and after surgery. This is the first randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of combined general anesthesia with SCPB using 0.125% versus 0.25% bupivacaine during tympanomastoid surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of bupivacaine 0.125% & 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery on operative field visualization, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that bupivacaine 0.125% would be non-inferior to bupivacaine 0.25% in achieving optimal surgical field visualization, hemodynamic stability, surgeon satisfaction and postoperative analgesia. This prospective double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 patients between 21 to 70 years, with ASA I-II and undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Participants were equally divided into two groups: Group A: Patients received SCPB using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline). Group B: Patients received SCPB using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).

NCT ID: NCT04276545 Completed - Bleeding Clinical Trials

Dexmedetomidine Improves the Surgical Field and Postoperative Recovery of Nasal Endoscopic Surgery

Start date: January 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Studies showed dexmedetomidine (DEX) could improve surgical field, but the effect for functional nasal endoscopic surgery (FESS) was unclear. The investigators explored IV administration of a single loading dose DEX (0.5μg/kg) for FESS, and IV administration of midazolam (0.05mg/kg) as a control with comparision of surgical field, haemodynamics, ventilation parameters and recovery.

NCT ID: NCT01701960 Withdrawn - Blood Pressure Clinical Trials

Effect of Local Anesthetic on Hemodynamic Measures During Nasal Surgery

Start date: November 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 to 1:200,000 of epinephrine is routinely injected into the nasal mucosa during nasal surgery to reduce patient blood loss and improve the surgical field and visibility. Typically 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 of epinephrine is used in nasal surgery. However, 1 % lidocaine with 1:200,000 (which is a more dilute solution of epinephrine) is also used. This latter dose theoretically should have a lesser effect on cardiac stimulation which increases the heart rate and blood pressure at the time of surgery. The nasal mucosa has excellent absorbing ability which is great for the application of drugs but there is concern for systemic absorption and side effects. Potential serious side effects can occur with local injection such as hypertension, tachycardia, and cardiac arrhythmias. These side effects occur mainly through the absorption of epinephrine. It is the goal of this study to see if a weaker concentration of epinephrine (1:200,000) can maintain a good surgical field with a decrease in hemodynamic side effects.