A Gamified Network for Surgical Education During COVID-19: A Randomized

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: Traditionally, medical students learn surgical skills through the observation of a resident or a surgeon performing the technique. Due to inconsistent practice opportunities in the clinical setting, a disparity of skill levels among students has been observed. In addition, the poor availability of faculty professors is a limiting factor in teaching and adequately preparing medical students for clerkship years. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical students do not have access to traditional suturing learning opportunities. Didactic courses are available on videoconferencing platforms, but they do not include technical training.

Objective: Our overarching goal is to evaluate the efficacy of web-based peer-learning for advanced suturing techniques (i.e., running subcuticular sutures). The investigators will use GEN (Gamified Educational Network), a newly developed online learning tool. The investigators will assess students' ability to identify and to perform the right technique. The investigators will also assess students' satisfaction with regards to GEN.

Methods: The investigators will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial with blinding of expert examiners. First-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine of Université de Montréal will be randomized to four groups: 1) control group, 2) self-learning, 3) peer-learning, and 4) peer-learning with expert feedback. Each arm will have 15 participants who will learn how to perform running subcuticular sutures through videos on GEN. For our primary outcome, students' ability to identify the right technique will be evaluated before and after the intervention on GEN. They will view eight videos and rate the surgical technique using the OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) Global Rating Scale (GRS) and the Subcuticular Suture Checklist as evaluation criteria. For our secondary outcomes, students will anonymously record themselves performing a running subcuticular suture and will be evaluated using the same scales. Then, a survey will be sent to analyze the overall performance of the platform.

Results: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by our institutional review board (CERSES 20-068-D). No participants have been recruited yet.

Conclusions: Peer-learning through GEN has the potential to overcome significant limitations related to the pandemic and the lack of availability of faculty professors. Further, a decrease of the anxiety related to traditional suturing classes can be expected. The investigators aim to create an innovative and sustainable method of teaching surgical skills to improve the efficiency and the quality of surgical training in medical faculties. With the current world events of COVID-19, the necessity for such tools are imperative.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04425499
Study type	Interventional
Source	Université de Montréal
Contact
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	June 2020
Completion date	June 2020

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04691206` - Operative Curriculum Gallbladder Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06421584` - Evaluating the Role of SURGical TElementoring in Acquisition of Surgical Skills of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. SURGTEACH Trial	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05830786` - Virtual Reality in Orthopaedic Surgical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06273579` - Efficiency of Verbal Intelligent Tutor Instruction in Neurosurgical Simulation	N/A
Completed	`NCT04111679` - EffectS of prEferred Music on Laparoscopic performancE	N/A
Completed	`NCT04908072` - Global Learning: an Orbis Virtual-platform Evaluation Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT01560494` - Validation of a Curriculum (STAC) for Technical Skill Acquisition in Minimally Invasive Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT05168150` - Testing the Efficacy of an Artificial Intelligence Real-Time Coaching SystemSystemSimulatioTraining of Medical Students	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06235788` - Effect of Intelligent Tutor Induced Pausing on Learning Simulated Surgical Skills	N/A
Completed	`NCT04700384` - Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligent Tutoring System in Simulation Training	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04851665` - Intelligent Cooperation is Influenced by Learning Theories
Terminated	`NCT02986217` - The Effect of Structured Feedback on Live Surgical Performance	N/A
Completed	`NCT04703400` - Analysis of the Impact on Surgical Residency Programs in Times of Pandemic in Argentina

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

A Gamified Network for Surgical Education During COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms