Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05627102
Other study ID # EPTE-NEUROMODULACIÓN
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 15, 2021
Est. completion date September 30, 2022

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source University of Cadiz
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy show a big impact, however, there is a lack of awareness about the options of the physiotherapist treatment. It is necessary to do studies about effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis and neuromodulation. This technique enables treatment of the tendinopathies. To analyze the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneou electrolysis and neuromodulation in the treatment of supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Single center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design. A specialist physician will be diagnosed the supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive treatmen for 4 weeks: percutaneou electrolysis and neuromodulation associated with eccentric exercises or conventional treatment of Physiotherapy with the same eccentric exercises. Both interventions were performed under ultrasound guidance with a portable ultrasound (General Electric LogicE). Data will be collected by a blinded evaluator.


Description:

Eccentric exercises of the supraspinatus muscle were performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Participants were asked to perform the exercise program on an individual basis twice every day for 4 weeks. The eccentric program consisted of 3 exercises, focusing on the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and scapular muscles. Participants were asked to do a normal abduction (concentric phase) and a slow return to the initial position (eccentric phase) included first the concentric phase, and the eccentric phase was slowly conducted. The exercise program was taught by a physiotherapist in the first session and monitored in the subsequent sessions.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date September 30, 2022
Est. primary completion date April 15, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinopathies that do not improve with conventional physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy protocols. - Subjects who are in an active state of pain, who present painful symptoms in a sensitive and painful area of the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus muscle in the humerus. Exclusion Criteria: - Individuals who have received surgery intervention in the same shoulder, or have suffered fractures or dislocations in the same shoulder. - Individuals have received the proposed treatment in one month´s period previously. - Individuals who suffering from cervical radiculopathies, fibromialgia síndrome, cardiac patients with pacemakers, cancer, infectious processes, or generalized lymphedema. - Pregnant women can not receive this treatment intervention.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Experimental Group
Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis an neuromodulation associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.
Conventional group
Ultrasound pulsatil therapy (US), transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes and associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Manuel Rodríguez Huguet Cadiz Cádiz

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Cadiz

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (18)

Arias-Buria JL, Truyols-Dominguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atin-Arratibel MA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:315219. doi: 10.1155/2015/315219. Epub 2015 Nov 15. — View Citation

Balci TO, Turk AC, Sahin F, Kotevoglu N, Kuran B. Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in treatment of adhesive capsulitis: A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(5):955-961. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150482. — View Citation

Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23. — View Citation

Dejaco B, Habets B, van Loon C, van Grinsven S, van Cingel R. Eccentric versus conventional exercise therapy in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, single blinded, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4223-x. Epub 2016 Jun 28. — View Citation

Desmeules F, Boudreault J, Roy JS, Dionne C, Fremont P, MacDermid JC. The efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Aug;16(3):276-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 23. — View Citation

Garcia Bermejo P, De La Cruz Torres B, Naranjo Orellana J, Albornoz Cabello M. Autonomic Responses to Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis: Effect of Needle Puncture or Electrical Current? J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0339. Epub 2017 Jan 30. — View Citation

Gunay Ucurum S, Kaya DO, Kayali Y, Askin A, Tekindal MA. Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jul;52(4):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 25. — View Citation

Heron SR, Woby SR, Thompson DP. Comparison of three types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy/shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 21. — View Citation

Khan KM, Cook JL, Maffulli N, Kannus P. Where is the pain coming from in tendinopathy? It may be biochemical, not only structural, in origin. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):81-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.81. No abstract available. Erratum In: Br J Sports Med 2000 Aug;34(4):318. — View Citation

Kinsella R, Cowan SM, Watson L, Pizzari T. A comparison of isometric, isotonic concentric and isotonic eccentric exercises in the physiotherapy management of subacromial pain syndrome/rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 14;3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0190-3. eCollection 2017. — View Citation

Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):236-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052175. Epub 2008 Sep 18. — View Citation

Lin ML, Chiu HW, Shih ZM, Lee PY, Li PZ, Guo CH, Luo YJ, Lin SC, Lin KY, Hsu YM, Pang A, Pang W. Two Transcutaneous Stimulation Techniques in Shoulder Pain: Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (TPRF) versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A Comparative Pilot Study. Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 4;2019:2823401. doi: 10.1155/2019/2823401. eCollection 2019. — View Citation

Littlewood C, Ashton J, Chance-Larsen K, May S, Sturrock B. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5. — View Citation

McCreesh K, Lewis J. Continuum model of tendon pathology - where are we now? Int J Exp Pathol. 2013 Aug;94(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/iep.12029. — View Citation

Osborne JD, Gowda AL, Wiater B, Wiater JM. Rotator cuff rehabilitation: current theories and practice. Phys Sportsmed. 2016;44(1):85-92. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1108883. Epub 2015 Nov 7. — View Citation

Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Lomas-Vega R, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Obrero-Gaitan E, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D. Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2068. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072068. — View Citation

Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez-Huguet P, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Lomas-Vega R. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):1837. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061837. — View Citation

Valera-Garrido F, Minaya-Munoz F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis in chronic lateral epicondylitis: short-term and long-term results. Acupunct Med. 2014 Dec;32(6):446-54. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010619. Epub 2014 Aug 13. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The intensity of shoulder pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009). Baseline
Secondary The intensity of shoulder pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009). Four weeks
Secondary The intensity of shoulder pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009). Twelve weeks
Secondary The intensity of shoulder pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009). twenty four weeks
Secondary Electromyographic activity Electromyography (EMG) measures and records the electrical activity of a muscle. Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
Secondary Strength of The rotator cuff The use of the hand dynamometer to measure the strength of shoulder movements Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks .
Secondary Questionnaire DASH. Functionality in the arm. Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
Secondary Scale SPADI. Functionality in the arm. Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
Secondary Assessment of structural changes in the tendon by ultrasound evaluation Assessment of possible structural changes in the tendon by ultrasound evaluation of thickening, hypoechogenicity, and hypervascularity. Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03184181 - Application of Percutaneous Electrolysis, Percutaneous Neuromodulation and Eccentric Exercise N/A
Withdrawn NCT05184985 - TrueRelief Efficacy for Supraspinatus Tendonitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06386926 - Radial Shockwave Versus Ultrasound Phonophoresis N/A
Completed NCT05241977 - MINIMUM EFFECTIVE VOLUME OF BUPIVACAİNE FOR ANTERIOR SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK
Completed NCT05793918 - Percutaneous Electrolysis, Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy and Eccentric Exercise in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05192746 - Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound Therapy in Supraspinatus Tendinitis N/A
Completed NCT04851951 - Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) One-Shot Injection For Supraspinatus Tendinosis
Completed NCT03744195 - Effect of Kinesotaping on Management of Supraspinatus Tendinitis N/A