Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Terminated
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03655119 |
Other study ID # |
HUM00125065 |
Secondary ID |
5U79SM061767 |
Status |
Terminated |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 10, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
March 11, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
University of Michigan |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) Family Support and Follow-Up Program is a service
delivery intervention that utilizes a multi-component approach to enhance usual care provided
to youth and families at the University of Michigan Psychiatric Emergency Services in order
to promote youth safety and provide support to families following their visit. During the
first phase of intervention, families will receive enhanced usual care by clinical staff
along with a family toolkit that includes a youth safety plan and written recommendations for
safety monitoring and supporting youth during a crisis. During the second phase of
intervention, families will receive the interventions provided during the first phase in
addition to caring contacts post discharge, which may occur by phone, text, or email. Caring
contacts are meant to provide support, additional education, and problem solving assistance.
Description:
All participants complete a battery of measures in the waiting room during their PES visit.
Youth will complete surveys that collect demographic information, assess current suicidal
ideation, perceptions of future suicidal risk, connectedness to others, reasons for living,
depression, alcohol use, and self-efficacy. Parents will complete questionnaires that gather
demographic information, self-efficacy, baseline means restriction, expectations, hopes, and
needs during their visit to PES, assess their child's adaptive functioning and behavioral,
social, and emotional adjustment, parent psychiatric history, parental distress, and
attitudes about the extent to which seeking mental health treatment is stigmatized. PES
clinicians will also administer the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale as part of
standard PES practices.
The first phase of intervention (Phase I) involves training clinical staff at PES to
implement a new model of service delivery that focuses on the PES visit as an opportunity for
crisis intervention for youth and families. The training incorporates best practices in brief
crisis-focused interventions in emergency settings. When the provider training is completed,
families will receive enhanced usual care by clinical staff along with a toolkit that
reinforces evidence-based practices for crisis management such as safety planning,
supervision, and monitoring of their at-risk youth. Parents and youth are asked to complete
the battery of baseline measures at PES, then an online follow-up survey at 3 days (parents
only) and 2 weeks (parents and youth) post discharge. Youth and parents are asked to report
on the extent to which they recall their clinician promoting best practice interventions such
as safety planning and means restriction during their visit and whether or not they felt
their needs were met in PES. Families will also report on barriers accessing outpatient care
and need for additional supports. Parents will be asked to report on any means restriction
and safety planning activities with their child and whether their child was connected to
outpatient services. Youth will be asked to report on the extent to which they feel supported
by their families in addition to information about their level of suicide risk.
The second intervention (Phase II) includes the interventions provided during phase I (i.e.,
enhanced care and toolkit) and caring follow-up contacts for parent participants. Caring
contacts post discharge may occur by phone, text, or email. This study will examine the
benefit of text messaging contacts in addition to phone contacts in the days and weeks post
discharge.
Data from Phase I will be compared to pre-test data obtained at baseline to assess the
potential benefits of enhancements to usual care as measured by families' increased abilities
to implement safety measures (means restriction, safety plans, risk assessment), support
(expressions of caring, modification of expectations), or link their child to outpatient
psychiatric treatment. Secondary analyses will explore possible mechanisms of action for
family behavior changes (or lack thereof), including levels of parent distress at baseline,
parents' stigma regarding receiving psychological services, and markers of the severity of
youth psychopathology (i.e., level of suicidality, depression, substance use, functional
impairment, and low parental connectedness). Parent ratings of self-efficacy are hypothesized
to change with the addition of the interventions during Phase I and Phase II.